Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12301

Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security
Date Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:30:01 +0200
Message-ID <D8gsx-7NJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CKGet-FO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKGHv-P2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKGRc-Su-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKH0S-VD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CP2Jr-6aE-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-backports@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 14 21:23:17 2021
Old-Return-Path <apo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.363 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jBH1M8ptli5OQ0vXLe7J"
MIME-Version 1.0
Authentication-Results ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=apo@gambaru.de smtp.mailfrom=apo@debian.org
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22930
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2d76f10acf50f7a11a4bc1ad7facc1ae845cfbd0.camel@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 45
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:23:01 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <2d76f10acf50f7a11a4bc1ad7facc1ae845cfbd0.camel@debian.org>
X-Original-References <438ce4ac-f4f8-f946-1663-b029efae4577@tarent.de> <6600963dce52ab8d72a82b5e027167b3d7c86b0d.camel@debian.org> <be94c73-b86-ad9d-531e-7517453fa83@tarent.de> <4b42b0cc3706e1c7f558ea4f19fcd7ed86f53db5.camel@debian.org> <5631e712-4980-229-49c6-c89a30f1640@tarent.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12301

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi backports team,

please remove tomcat9 from buster-backports because Emmanuel won't have the
time to update the package for the next months and I don't intend to maintain
it. My recommendation for all users of tomcat9 is to use the version in buster
because it receives full security support. You also have the option to upgrade
to bullseye.

Regards,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-10 22:10 +0200
  Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-08-10 22:40 +0200
    Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-10 22:50 +0200
      Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-08-10 23:00 +0200
        Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-10-14 23:30 +0200
            Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2021-10-15 11:00 +0200

csiph-web