Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12302

Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security

From	Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security
Date	2021-10-15 11:00 +0200
Message-ID	<D8reh-7uC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <CKGHv-P2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKGRc-Su-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKH0S-VD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CP2Jr-6aE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <D8gsx-7NJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:23:01PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi backports team,
> 
> please remove tomcat9 from buster-backports because Emmanuel won't have the
> time to update the package for the next months and I don't intend to maintain
> it. My recommendation for all users of tomcat9 is to use the version in buster
> because it receives full security support. You also have the option to upgrade
> to bullseye.
Done

Alex

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-10 22:10 +0200
  Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-08-10 22:40 +0200
    Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-10 22:50 +0200
      Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-08-10 23:00 +0200
        Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-10-14 23:30 +0200
            Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2021-10-15 11:00 +0200

csiph-web