Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12301

Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security

From	Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security
Date	2021-10-14 23:30 +0200
Message-ID	<D8gsx-7NJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<CKGet-FO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKGHv-P2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKGRc-Su-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKH0S-VD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CP2Jr-6aE-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi backports team,

please remove tomcat9 from buster-backports because Emmanuel won't have the
time to update the package for the next months and I don't intend to maintain
it. My recommendation for all users of tomcat9 is to use the version in buster
because it receives full security support. You also have the option to upgrade
to bullseye.

Regards,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-10 22:10 +0200
  Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-08-10 22:40 +0200
    Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-10 22:50 +0200
      Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-08-10 23:00 +0200
        Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-08-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2021-10-14 23:30 +0200
            Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2021-10-15 11:00 +0200

csiph-web