Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11812

Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]
Date	Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:00:03 +0200
Message-ID	<AxbPB-6Qv-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<AsPaW-1Sv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <AvKRs-3a1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <AvKRs-3a1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <AvKRs-3a1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <AvKRs-3a1-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <AvKRs-3a1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <AwKml-6Yz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AwKml-6Yz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ax41H-271-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxbPB-6Qv-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jul 27 13:51:02 2020
Old-Return-Path	<tmancill@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.599 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, REMOVEDOT=3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mS4wk8l1jKFD4cQ6HA1oBay9sT92NRMCpAf5uUnxbaw=; b=uaLHcTa/Z+EKtnYArJicCznI9+OAfTt7bteDKFzyz9xyyT65/i57X5NJXaTXCgeLw2 MX50AtM38+PYWIVKl06ETg49SiyVvb+IfN+ZIwnEvRMioD0o2GB+lLCtMWTJ1MWR0AD4 +/aofhtrBJjC46H/ggb0t6ncbMVvQe5d/vZGYhG6IvUjO2J777a7AAkFkwM3gw2RaEgp XlKvBp2PlRt02D2gRfK5jCQaCYs282qGTYxWOiIwt22ejdWYCwZ0iSlS0Rs7QpeBXUT7 yQVjg+zTGZpnVEADF53E+tTaidqSkuGY8PGphOAhrmKemG0lmi91Bv6tTOs7hewH12Zj Xv2w==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mS4wk8l1jKFD4cQ6HA1oBay9sT92NRMCpAf5uUnxbaw=; b=kFUwFXDVh1mobAzt1mC/4A/qUM5B+gEZRSvh1YVXMrGrLIRh+F8jL6OOe9R5+V7PFR qUBzKrGOFP5faXhuROlBmhLKShqIrlDJJ6LsNBWlg+6gQiw1QtC8NgMSsBSux5FI2vjP 6OjPdQD5AkjuuB/NMGnGxyG58ZO1j/J8vLkBN8emv8HhdbzXmMSL7S76vomyX07MuDn6 bsCZECz3ylY7LWof5EEp26eH8IgXnqt7pmXSuI+CaZV5yWGfNsRU0Rl0vgtGByUGv20p xGfJm7O1/AoRb1DvL9K8/w3w96czDstc+Yyha8+triG1Nxpu1G6U4DK3FhohEjO0gLQK JrUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State	AOAM5326gwLdaTy/sxOz8yBP94xQLVWfqtphqu+u1NO3E2NF7FQiTdnB /xRwoICZwv5Kw2/94oXac6c=
X-Google-SMTP-Source	ABdhPJyY2u+zRynIz0TdP0Ydzz8XLwM7juehRWmo+D0CLegTrafVEtEOkHMmdFvJkQXQZ9U2bHMqFg==
X-Received	by 2002:a17:90a:3909:: with SMTP id y9mr16998586pjb.188.1595857846409; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 06:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sneagmfwfwth7ldl"
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22409
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20200727135044.iy4z34przcwyyxci@lark
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	66
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Mon, 27 Jul 2020 06:50:44 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID	<20200727135044.iy4z34przcwyyxci@lark>
X-Original-References	<20200715125939.GD18202@an3as.eu> <7d25d75c-8a64-44b4-727a-0e78356a181e@debian.org> <741e4443-34d9-7c8c-f30f-4b1e847e5cec@gmail.com> <c87cd652-6e76-2341-1101-66f065121294@debian.org> <4b796525-403a-fe62-e77f-1ea6ffa12939@gmail.com> <20200723145510.GH12782@an3as.eu> <a0a1b5db-b4ae-ee83-1501-1b21dd88c8a5@gmail.com> <20200726083407.GJ8994@an3as.eu> <20200727053806.hrjj2ldtj23c7zzg@lark> <6fa84692-5c1c-45d9-e593-5ad604ba66f2@gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender	tony mancill <tmancill@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:11812

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Andrius,

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, merkys@debian.org wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 2020-07-27 08:38, tony mancill wrote:
> >> It actually seems that org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism is not
> >> part of the currently packaged CDK.  Any idea how to solve this?
> > I am just starting to take a look a this, but I think we need to spend
> > some more time with CDK.  That class is found in the "legacy" directory
> > of the sources:
> > 
> > ➜  cdk-2.3.134.g1bb9a64587 find . -name Isomorphism.java
> > ./legacy/src/main/java/org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism.java
> > 
> > But the legacy pom is ignored:
> > 
> >   https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cdk/-/blob/master/debian/libcdk-java.poms#L91
> 
> Indeed, cdk-smsd pom is ignored (I made that so). However, if I remove
> the '--ignore' instruction, the built jar is codeless:

Based upon the sources layout, I wouldn't expect the cdk-smsd.pom in the
root project to include that class anyway.

> W: libcdk-java: codeless-jar usr/share/java/cdk-smsd.jar
> 
> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what might
> be the reason of codeless jar. It seems to me that cdk-smsd is legacy
> now, and I would suggest asking the upstream for advice how to port code
> depending on it.

I still plan to take a look at what it would take to compile the
legacy/pom.xml.

Cheers,
tony

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-04-15 15:00 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-04-21 07:00 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-04-28 11:00 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-01 11:40 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2020-07-02 01:40 +0200
    Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-15 15:00 +0200
      Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-23 17:00 +0200
        Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 10:40 +0200
          Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 07:40 +0200
            Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to  latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 16:00 +0200
              Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to  latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-29 05:50 +0200
                Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to  latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-29 09:30 +0200

csiph-web