Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11576
| From | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) |
| Date | 2020-04-21 07:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zXTaO-4jA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zVPO2-1iH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zXTaO-4jA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Andrius,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:18:04AM +0300, merkys@debian.org wrote:
> Some time ago I had attempted packaging new freehep-vectorgraphics, with
> considerable success. However, I dropped the ball and did not upload it.
> I have pushed my packaging to salsa [1].
Thanks a lot for the promising hint.
> There is one issue, though. Old freehep-* JARs are split into multitude
> of source and binary packages, while my packaging uses single source
> package (I find it more convenient than splitting and linking) and
> currently puts all the JARs in one binary package. One of the following
> options has to be chosen:
>
> 1. Have only one binary package. This would have to replace all old
> binary packages with Conflicts+Replaces.
>
> 2. Split JARs to resemble old binary packages. AFAIK, this would require
> epoch (1:) for the new binary packages, as they would come from
> different source package.
>
> I would probably go with the option 2.
I admit I have no strong opinion on this as long as we will get a
feature complete cjk package. Since you also are maintaining cjk would
you volunteer to care for this? This would be really appreciated as
a contribution to our covid-19 effort.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/freehep-vectorgraphics
--
http://fam-tille.de
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-04-15 15:00 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-04-21 07:00 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-04-28 11:00 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-01 11:40 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2020-07-02 01:40 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-15 15:00 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-23 17:00 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 10:40 +0200
Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others) tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 07:40 +0200
Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 16:00 +0200
Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-29 05:50 +0200
Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-29 09:30 +0200
csiph-web