Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #11814

Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]

From tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]
Date 2020-07-29 05:50 +0200
Message-ID <AxLgl-36b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <AwKml-6Yz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ax41H-271-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxbPB-6Qv-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxbPB-6Qv-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <AxLgl-36b-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:56:24AM +0300, merkys@debian.org wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, merkys@debian.org wrote:
> >> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what might
> >> be the reason of codeless jar. It seems to me that cdk-smsd is legacy
> >> now, and I would suggest asking the upstream for advice how to port code
> >> depending on it.
> > I still plan to take a look at what it would take to compile the
> > legacy/pom.xml.
> 
> Sure, please do. However, I would not count too much on this pom, as it
> may get removed in the upcoming cdk releases.

Fair enough...  In the long run, it is likely that porting r-cran-rcdk
is a better use of time.  However, I got interested in it and here is
the status so far:

1) I updated jgrapht0.6 to install a pom file and uploaded a new
package to unstable. 

2) I updated the cdk source package to build-dep on the javacc maven
plugin and re-enabled the legacy pom.

3) I used ratt to build packages that build-depend on cdk.  The
new package addresses the issue with r-cran-rcdk, but cinfony fails:

2020/07/28 20:27:10 PASSED: r-cran-rcdklibs
2020/07/28 20:27:10 FAILED: cinfony (see buildlogs/cinfony_1.2-4)

However, the cinfony failure on my system is for:

      unsat-dependency: python-indigo:amd64

And it also fails when built against cdk_2.3.134.g1bb9a64587-1, so I
don't think this is related to my change.

I created a merge request [1] so you can take a look.  I'm happy to
prepare an upload if it looks okay to you.

Cheers,
tony

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cdk/-/merge_requests/4

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-04-15 15:00 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-04-21 07:00 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-04-28 11:00 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-01 11:40 +0200
  Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2020-07-02 01:40 +0200
    Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-15 15:00 +0200
      Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-23 17:00 +0200
        Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 10:40 +0200
          Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably  others) tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 07:40 +0200
            Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to  latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 16:00 +0200
              Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to  latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-07-29 05:50 +0200
                Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to  latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)] Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-29 09:30 +0200

csiph-web