Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > it.comp.os.linux.sys > #45390
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> |
| Newsgroups | it.comp.os.linux.sys |
| Subject | Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable |
| Date | Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:03:14 +0100 |
| Organization | bitit.it |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <20250304090314.1c7527d0@bitit.it> (permalink) |
| References | <20250228122558.2a5aae13@bitit.it> <vptavo$3r4ve$2@dont-email.me> <20250302173137.3d89b350@bitit.it> <2rpe9l-i16.ln1@lazy.lzy> <20250303085105.5da3efd3@bitit.it> <5g6h9l-755.ln1@lazy.lzy> <20250303190125.0b2454a1@bitit.it> <vq6683$1oc4b$2@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:03:14 +0100 (CET) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="9b18a2f5fc9fe796cd3c6dafde0ba515"; logging-data="1886160"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Sl94xqXElkCAO/bbxwu7f" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:l3KtoR/yT/L6UVppilD+x3LHjGg= |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-mageia-linux-gnu) |
| Xref | csiph.com it.comp.os.linux.sys:45390 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> Questo se gli dai la shell interattiva. In realtà puoi anche limitare > l'utente al solo comando scp e un path specifico (ad esempio). devo capire se il pannello me lo consente agevolmente; altrimenti se ogni volta che metto mano a un virtual server devo perdere tempo a sistemare tutto a mano . comunque è una soluzione > Questo per dovere di cronaca, poi ci possono essere tanti altri > motivi per preferire ftp incluso il fatto che ci sono dei clienti da > soddisfare. > anche. Enrico
Back to it.comp.os.linux.sys | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-02-28 12:25 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-02-28 16:46 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-02-28 21:48 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-02 17:31 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-02 19:48 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-03 08:50 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-02 20:57 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-03 08:51 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-03 18:46 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-03 19:01 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-04 06:22 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-04 09:03 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 09:15 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 09:47 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 10:57 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 12:35 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 14:16 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 14:20 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 15:33 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 18:50 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-08 13:12 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-09 15:51 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Giuseppe Della Bianca <giusdbgNO@gmailNO.comNO> - 2025-03-09 15:19 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-09 19:57 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-02-28 23:09 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-02 17:29 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-02 20:31 +0100
csiph-web