Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > it.comp.os.linux.sys > #45392
| From | Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | it.comp.os.linux.sys |
| Subject | Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable |
| Date | 2025-03-05 09:15 +0100 |
| Organization | bitit.it |
| Message-ID | <20250305091540.13a44156@bitit.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <2rpe9l-i16.ln1@lazy.lzy> <20250303085105.5da3efd3@bitit.it> <5g6h9l-755.ln1@lazy.lzy> <20250303190125.0b2454a1@bitit.it> <vq6683$1oc4b$2@dont-email.me> |
> Questo se gli dai la shell interattiva. In realtà puoi anche limitare > l'utente al solo comando scp e un path specifico (ad esempio). Comunque sarebbe un filtro a livello di utente, ma l'accesso a ssh non sarebbe più limitato a ip specifici
Back to it.comp.os.linux.sys | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-02-28 12:25 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-02-28 16:46 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-02-28 21:48 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-02 17:31 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-02 19:48 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-03 08:50 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-02 20:57 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-03 08:51 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-03 18:46 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-03 19:01 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-04 06:22 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-04 09:03 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 09:15 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 09:47 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 10:57 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 12:35 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 14:16 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 14:20 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-05 15:33 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable sm <carotone@test.it> - 2025-03-05 18:50 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-08 13:12 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-09 15:51 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Giuseppe Della Bianca <giusdbgNO@gmailNO.comNO> - 2025-03-09 15:19 +0000
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-09 19:57 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-02-28 23:09 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Enrico Maria Chellini <bitit@bitit.it> - 2025-03-02 17:29 +0100
Re: proFTPD VS vsftpd & firewalld vs nftable Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2025-03-02 20:31 +0100
csiph-web