Re: Function definitions

Path	csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!171.64.64.130.MISMATCH!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From	Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: Function definitions
Date	Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:32:41 -0500
Lines	14
Sender	Chet Ramey <chet@caleb.ins.cwru.edu>
Approved	bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID	<mailman.9756.1519659207.27995.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<877er0qbb7.fsf@gmail.com> <3f544894-f4e2-4c51-9202-6a6e92ae8ebb@case.edu> <87woyzpyec.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To	chet.ramey@case.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host	lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace	usenet.stanford.edu 1519659207 1337 208.118.235.17 (26 Feb 2018 15:33:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc	chet.ramey@case.edu, bug-bash@gnu.org, chet@po.cwru.edu
To	moosotc@gmail.com
Envelope-to	bug-bash@gnu.org
In-Reply-To	Message from moosotc@gmail.com of Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:24:11 +0300 (id <87woyzpyec.fsf@gmail.com>)
Read-Receipt-To	chet.ramey@case.edu
X-Junkmail-Status	score=8/60, host=mpv3-2015.case.edu
X-Junkmail-PrAS-Raw	score=8/60, refid=2.7.2:2018.2.26.145115:17:8.707, ip=, rules=DATE_TZ_NA, __HAS_FROM, FROM_EDU_TLD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, LEO_OBFU_SUBJ_RE, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __HAS_CC_HDR, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2, __HAS_REPLYTO, __REFERENCES, __IN_REP_TO, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN, __ANY_URI, __URI_WITH_PATH, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __URI_IN_BODY, __URI_NOT_IMG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_400_499, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, IN_REP_TO, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, __SINGLE_URI_TEXT, SINGLE_URI_IN_BODY, MULTIPLE_RCPTS, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_P, REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, [TRUNCATED], so=2010-03-03 19:42:08, dmn=2016-08-03-0138
X-detected-operating-system	by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From	129.22.103.194
X-BeenThere	bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.21
Precedence	list
List-Id	Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post	<mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help	<mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref	csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:13754

Show key headers only | View raw

> Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> writes:

> Thank you for an explanation. My takeaway is that most, if not all,
> [kaz]sh descendants[1] allow something that IEEE Std 1003.1-2008, 2016
> Edition doesn't.

Yep, nothing wrong with that. All shells include extensions beyond what
Posix specifies.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Function definitions Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-02-26 10:32 -0500

csiph-web