Re: Function definitions

From	Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: Function definitions
Date	2018-02-26 10:32 -0500
Message-ID	<mailman.9756.1519659207.27995.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<877er0qbb7.fsf@gmail.com> <3f544894-f4e2-4c51-9202-6a6e92ae8ebb@case.edu> <87woyzpyec.fsf@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

> Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> writes:

> Thank you for an explanation. My takeaway is that most, if not all,
> [kaz]sh descendants[1] allow something that IEEE Std 1003.1-2008, 2016
> Edition doesn't.

Yep, nothing wrong with that. All shells include extensions beyond what
Posix specifies.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Function definitions Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-02-26 10:32 -0500

csiph-web