Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #13754 > unrolled thread

Re: Function definitions

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Function definitions Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-02-26 10:32 -0500

#13754 — Re: Function definitions

> Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> writes:

> Thank you for an explanation. My takeaway is that most, if not all,
> [kaz]sh descendants[1] allow something that IEEE Std 1003.1-2008, 2016
> Edition doesn't.

Yep, nothing wrong with that. All shells include extensions beyond what
Posix specifies.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug

csiph-web