Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > de.sci.electronics > #351382
| From | Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | de.sci.electronics |
| Subject | Re: Schlüssel: Brute force |
| Date | 2024-05-09 15:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v1ik8t$2ahs$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <l9p70uFrctoU3@mid.individual.net> <v18jf4$21q8$1@solani.org> <la1chtF3m57U6@mid.individual.net> <v1gb5t$123l$1@solani.org> <v1hvt9$1td1t$1@news1.tnib.de> |
Marc Haber wrote: > Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> wrote: >> AES hat den Vorteil, daß er wohl der Populärste ist, und bisher dennoch nicht >> mit erkannter Praxisrelevanz angegriffen werden konnte. > > ... und außerdem auf breiter Basis in weit verbreiteter Hardware > implementiert ist. Ich muß mal testen, was das wirklich bringt. Am Rande: |Rabbit 2.80 |Salsa20 2.80 |Sosemanuk 1.20 |HC-128 0.60 |NLS v2 -0.60 |LEX v2 -1.20 |CryptMT v3 -1.40 |Dragon -1.60 | |For each algorithm attendees were asked to tick one of the following three |choices regarding its suitability for the final portfolio: | very suitable, neutral, not very suitable. |The first and third votes counted for +5 and -5 points each, with |the final score being averaged over the number of votes cast for a given algorithm. Es gibt bei weitem nicht nur AES. (Man könnte den Eindruck gewinnen.) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Helmut Schellong
Back to de.sci.electronics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marco Moock <mm+solani@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-05-01 19:53 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-01 23:03 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marco Moock <mm+solani@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-05-02 10:00 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-02 12:22 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-02 13:20 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-02 13:52 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-02 17:11 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-02 18:29 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-02 20:19 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-05-04 13:50 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-04 17:53 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de> - 2024-05-04 20:08 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-04 22:03 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Rupert Haselbeck <mein-rest-muell@gmx.de> - 2024-05-04 22:40 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-05-05 01:10 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-05 12:48 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-05-05 12:57 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-05 20:34 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-05-08 15:21 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-08 19:01 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-09 10:01 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-09 15:49 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-05-10 14:15 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-10 16:44 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-05-13 19:12 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-13 20:48 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-10 18:04 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Ralph Aichinger <ralph@pi.h5.or.at> - 2024-05-10 16:22 +0000
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-10 21:25 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-11 12:41 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Volker Bartheld <news2024@bartheld.net> - 2024-05-11 13:38 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-11 12:41 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-10 21:16 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-11 12:42 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-11 14:12 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-11 14:32 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de> - 2024-05-11 15:49 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-11 16:37 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-11 16:31 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-11 17:36 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-11 18:48 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Volker Bartheld <news2024@bartheld.net> - 2024-05-11 21:47 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-05-05 01:08 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-05 12:45 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2024-05-04 18:34 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-04 20:08 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Falk Dµebbert <falk@duebbert.com> - 2024-05-07 17:33 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Helmut Schellong <var@schellong.biz> - 2024-05-07 18:08 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-01 23:19 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Leo Baumann <ib@leobaumann.de> - 2024-05-02 03:10 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marco Moock <mm+solani@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-05-02 10:04 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2024-05-02 10:36 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-04 19:18 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-04 19:17 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-02 08:13 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de> - 2024-05-02 13:13 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Eric Bruecklmeier <u@5i7.de> - 2024-05-02 08:23 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Marco Moock <mm+solani@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-05-02 10:05 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Thomas Prufer <prufer.public@mnet-online.de.invalid> - 2024-05-02 10:24 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Eric Bruecklmeier <u@5i7.de> - 2024-05-02 12:24 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Thomas Prufer <prufer.public@mnet-online.de.invalid> - 2024-05-02 16:52 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Eric Bruecklmeier <nil@nil.nil> - 2024-05-03 08:29 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2024-05-02 11:15 +0200
Re: Schlüssel: Brute force Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de> - 2024-05-02 13:16 +0200
csiph-web