Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > de.comp.lang.python > #5591
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Güttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> |
| Newsgroups | de.comp.lang.python |
| Subject | [Python-de] Statistical-Profiling: Seedscope & py-spy. Oder New-Relic, AppDynamics? |
| Date | Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:38:05 +0100 |
| Lines | 26 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.222.1574674692.25794.python-de@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <8bae4b2b-9b9c-d3db-df2e-2bb282210cd4@thomas-guettler.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de KxXa1D9uvwFrrL7TmOWQjg+yk+lmpEvsHYe7CNxd8/eA== |
| Return-Path | <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> |
| X-Original-To | python-de@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-de@mail.python.org |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 |
| Content-Language | de-DE |
| X-BeenThere | python-de@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.29 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Die Deutsche Python Mailingliste <python-de.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-de>, <mailto:python-de-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-de/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-de@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-de-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-de>, <mailto:python-de-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <8bae4b2b-9b9c-d3db-df2e-2bb282210cd4@thomas-guettler.de> |
| Xref | csiph.com de.comp.lang.python:5591 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hallo, ich habe nun das este mal speedscope genutzt. Die Performance-Daten wurden mit py-spy ermittelt. Eine sehr coole Kombi. Siehe: https://github.com/jlfwong/speedscope Aktuell untersuche ich warum es so lange dauert, bis alle Tests bei uns gelaufen sind (rund 30 Minuten). Da macht sich Statistical-Profiling gut. Nutzt ihr Statistical-Profiling? Falls ja wie? Hat jemand Erfahrung mit den kommerziellen Tools wie New-Relic oder AppDynamics? Gruß, Thomas -- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
Back to de.comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar
[Python-de] Statistical-Profiling: Seedscope & py-spy. Oder New-Relic, AppDynamics? Thomas Güttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> - 2019-11-25 10:38 +0100
csiph-web