Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.theory > #22277

Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined)

From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.theory, comp.ai.philosophy, comp.ai.nat-lang, sci.lang.semantics
Subject Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined)
Date 2020-08-10 10:55 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <87d03y4c86.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <NfudndclNaOVQ63CnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <87lfin3uy8.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <9YudnWkJupFsfq3CnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@giganews.com> <87h7tb3ttk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <ldSdnZfQed9ExazCnZ2dnUU7-XvNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
> On 8/10/2020 1:20 AM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>> On 8/10/2020 12:56 AM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>> On 8/10/2020 12:22 AM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>>>> On 8/9/2020 11:36 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/9/2020 10:41 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/9/2020 8:37 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/9/2020 4:44 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/9/2020 3:57 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't have, and have never had, a Turing machine with the properties
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you claim.  It would be good if you admitted that and moved on because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempting to defend the indefensible is taking up a lot of your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a finite state machine that implements computationally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent code to the Peter Linz H_Hat such that this computational
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent correctly decides halting on itself showing exactly how the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard self-referential halting problem counter-example can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defeated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I recall, you've claimed to have pseudocode that you were going
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to translate into working software.  Did you ever actually get it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written and running?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a finite state machine, or do you merely have an *idea*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a finite state machine?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I translated the finite state equivalent of the same self-referential
>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-example that all the Halting Problem proofs are based on into
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C". I am using a very excellent x86 interpreter to run the machine
>>>>>>>>>>>>> code of this "C" function. It turns out that Visual "C++" generates
>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine code that is easier to understand than g++.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So now you have a "C" function.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The quotation marks around C seem odd.  Are they significant, and if
>>>>>>>>>>>> so, what's the difference between a "C" function and a C function?
>>>>>>>>>>>> I presume you're referring to the C programming language.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How many lines of C code are in this function?  I presume posting
>>>>>>>>>>>> that number wouldn't harm its "trade secret" status.  (I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>> interested in any answer to this question that isn't a specific
>>>>>>>>>>>> positive integer.)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can't finish the halt decider until its master UTM is complete.
>>>>>>>>>>> The details of the greatly enhanced halt decider have been designed
>>>>>>>>>>> for many months.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this function conform to the C language standard?  Which edition
>>>>>>>>>>>> (C90, C99, C11, ...)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this "C" function exist in the context of a C program that
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can compile, link, and execute?  Have you done so?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It can only be correctly executed inside the master UTM and this is
>>>>>>>>>>> not quite built yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you need an x86 interpreter to "run the machine code of this
>>>>>>>>>>>> "C" function"?  Why can't you just compile it with an ordinary C
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I need to function to examine its own machine code because the control
>>>>>>>>>>> flow of machine code is straight forward. I need an x86 interpreter as
>>>>>>>>>>> the basis of the master UTM.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> compiler and execute it?  I understand that the goal is to feed
>>>>>>>>>>>> your program its own machine code as input (correct?), but are you
>>>>>>>>>>>> able to create an executable that can be run with, for example,
>>>>>>>>>>>> empty input?  (I understand that it might fail with empty input,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but the ability to run the program *at all* is a significant step.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The machine code examines itself and decides halting on itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The key part that I have been working on for the last week is building
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the context switching aspect of the master UTM such that one UTM can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute another UTM and this can be to arbitrary depth. I am guessing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this will be done very soon. Although this is the most difficult
>>>>>>>>>>>>> part that remains it is standard operating system software
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Converting an x86 interpreter into a UTM that can execute a chain of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTMs of arbitrary depth has taken most of my time. Half of this time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was learning the internals of the x86 interpreter well enough that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can make the changes needed. Less that 10% of my time was spent on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything directly related to halt deciding.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing you've written actually responds to anything I asked.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll just conclude that you have a vague "design" for some code that
>>>>>>>>>> you eventually intend to write, and that you haven't yet written
>>>>>>>>>> an actual C function of any kind.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you understand what the x86 language is and you understand what a
>>>>>>>>> UTM is then you can put them together and know what I have. If you
>>>>>>>>> don't understand what these are then you cannot begin to understand
>>>>>>>>> what I have.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nonsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is exactly the answer that would be expected from someone that
>>>>>>> does not know the underlying subject matter. I have been working with
>>>>>>> the x86 language since the early 1980's. This was back when 64K was
>>>>>>> the maximum segment size. Boy is it a relief to have 4 GB segments,
>>>>>>> switching between 64K segments was so tedious.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Resorting to insults means you don't have to explain anything, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Merely an objective assessment.
>>>>
>>>> Whatever.  I'm not going to follow that particular digression any further.
>>>>
>>>>>> I've noticed you tend to do that when someone pushes you to answer a
>>>>>> simple question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an easy one.  You've used the phrase
>>>>>>        a "C" function
>>>>>> Is there any significant difference in meaning between that and
>>>>>>        a C function
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it is merely easier to read.
>>>>
>>>> Great.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a number of times I have to ask a straightforward question
>>>> before you'll answer it?  Would it help if I just ask it that
>>>> many times in a single post?  (This doesn't imply I'd be willing
>>>> to do that.)  Yes, I'm being a bit sarcastic, but if you'll read
>>>> the quoted material in this post, I think you'll see that you've
>>>> been extraordinarily unwilling to answer simple questions (and
>>>> that has led me to make certain inferences that I won't get into
>>>> for the moment).
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, putting quotation marks around C does not make it easier
>>>> to read.  As you can see my my response, all it does is make me
>>>> think that there's some significance to them.  But now that I know
>>>> that there isn't:
>>>>
>>>> You've referred to a C function.  Have you written this C function?
>>>> Is it, or is it intended to be, in standard C?  Which edition of the
>>>> standard does it attempt to conform to?  How many lines long is it?
>>>> (If you were willing to share the function itself that would be
>>>> great, but I presume you won't do that.)
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave questions about what the function is supposed to do
>>>> for later.
>>>
>>> I can't write the function yet because its operating system is not
>>> finished.
>>
>> So you have no C function.  Got it.
>>
>>>            The function itself is in very standard very simple c.
>>
>> You mean it *will be* in very standard very simple C.
>
> Some of the code is written and executing.

You said "I can't write the function yet".  "Some of the code" could
mean anything.  You don't have a C function.

>  >> It is the same c since the first ansi c. I began writing c back when
>>> it was K&R c.
>>
>> Great, so did I.  I'm not sure what you mean by "the same c".
>> If you mean that this C function that you haven't written yet will
>> be compatible with the first ANSI C standard and with all later
>> standards, that's fine.  
>
> I can't write the halt deciding aspects of the code until after I have
> added heap allocation and process context switching support. Their
> detailed design has been complete for many months. This has been very
> significanlty augmented from the 2018_12_13 initial specification.
>
>> If you mean that the language itself hasn't
>> changed, that's simply incorrect.  I'll explain further if and only
>> if you ask me to.
>
> It is and has been the x86 language for many months. When I finish
> adding minimal operating system support it will be a UTM having the
> x86 language as its Turing Machine Description language. with at least
> two (build from scratch) operating system functions that can be
> invoked from this language: (1) Allocation for the heap (2) Process
> context switching from one UTM to another.

You were talking about C.  I responded with more information about C.
In response, you talk about "the x86 language".

What exactly do you mean by "the x86 language"?  Please don't assume
I'm ignorant (I'm not), merely that I don't know just what you mean
by the phrase.

>>>> I've already asked you these questions, and you ignored them.
>>>> I presume that it's important *to you* to communicate something
>>>> about what you're working on.  It's less important to me.  So I'm
>>>> not going to be as persistent about getting you to answer these
>>>> simple questions.
>>>
>>> I told you that I can't write the function because its operating
>>> system is not finished.
>>>
>>>>>> I'm just asking you to explain the quotation marks.  If they don't
>>>>>> mean anything, that's fine.
>>
>> You claimed to have a C function.  You don't.  You acknowledge that
>> you haven't written it.  No doubt you have some design or idea, or
>> perhaps something written down in some kind of pseudocode, and
>> we could discuss that if you like, but you don't have a C function.
>
> I have a c function that is fully executable except for those aspects
> that depends on operating system support.

In other words you don't have an executable C function.

Your goal is to solve the halting problem, right?  *Almost* solving the
halting problem is easy (and uninteresting).

>> I *think* you've said or implied that this C function is the same
>> thing as the "fully encoded Turing Machine" you've been making
>> claims about (because C is Turing-complete, and you therefore think
>> you can call any chunk of C code a "fully encoded Turing machine").
>> Is that correct?  So you never had your Turing machine either.
>
> All c code is Turing complete except for processes such as counting to
> infinity and storing the result. If a machine had x-bit relative
> addressing and no direct memory addressing then c could be easily
> mapped to an actual Turing machine.

I think you mean the C language, not "All c code".

This is C code:

    int main(void) { }

As you know, it is not Turing complete.  My point is that precision is
important, and if you write "All c code" when you really mean "The C
programming language", it's impossible to to know what else you've
written that means something else.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-03 13:17 -0500
  Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-04 01:57 +0100
    Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-03 20:07 -0500
      Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-04 02:45 +0100
        Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-03 21:00 -0500
          Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-04 04:05 +0100
            Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-03 23:29 -0500
              Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-04 00:11 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 01:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-04 01:01 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 09:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-04 09:30 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 11:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-04 19:35 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 23:30 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-04 23:10 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 00:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-05 00:44 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 13:04 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-05 19:57 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 21:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-05 20:27 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 22:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-05 21:37 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 22:34 -0500
              Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-04 15:47 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 09:54 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-04 20:44 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 14:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-05 01:40 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 19:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-05 02:06 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-04 23:25 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-05 12:49 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 13:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-05 21:32 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 16:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-05 23:48 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 20:09 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-06 03:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-05 22:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-06 11:48 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-06 10:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-06 20:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-06 15:09 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-06 23:03 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-06 18:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-07 02:51 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 10:25 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-07 17:12 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 11:48 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-07 16:55 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 12:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-07 11:13 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 12:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-07 12:24 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 14:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-07 20:06 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 23:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-08 01:01 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 11:29 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 14:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 13:24 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 16:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 17:11 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 17:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 15:43 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-08 11:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 12:10 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-07 23:41 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 18:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-08 00:20 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 19:11 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-08 01:50 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-07 20:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-07 20:21 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-08 03:53 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 13:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-08 23:06 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 00:01 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-08 00:03 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 14:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-08 13:42 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-08 03:30 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-07 23:12 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 13:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-08 20:17 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 14:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-08 23:17 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-08 13:38 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 15:05 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 19:16 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-09 01:32 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 19:49 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-09 02:25 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-08 21:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-08 23:13 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-09 17:27 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-09 12:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-09 21:57 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-09 16:30 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-09 14:44 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-09 17:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-10 00:16 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-09 20:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-10 03:08 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-09 21:35 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-10 15:02 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 10:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-10 16:42 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing machine) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 11:49 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing machine) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-11 00:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 18:49 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 18:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 18:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-11 03:49 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-11 15:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-11 22:16 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-11 16:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-11 14:53 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-11 17:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-12 00:53 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-11 20:04 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-11 21:25 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-11 22:56 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-12 13:40 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 09:49 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-12 16:47 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 12:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-12 18:25 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 14:45 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 15:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 17:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-12 21:36 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 15:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-12 23:00 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 17:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 01:21 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 19:54 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-12 18:36 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 21:01 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 04:25 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 22:39 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-13 02:56 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 10:48 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-13 10:51 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 12:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-13 12:03 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 14:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-13 22:02 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 11:50 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 10:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 20:38 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 14:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 23:17 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 09:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 22:23 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 15:56 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 14:28 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 17:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 17:58 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 20:14 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 21:03 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 23:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 00:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-14 23:35 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 22:56 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Decidability) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 18:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 16:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-13 15:02 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 17:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 00:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 10:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 22:33 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 00:01 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 22:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 13:50 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-13 03:00 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35? (Gödel) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 10:56 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-11 20:48 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-11 22:37 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-11 22:48 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 00:28 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-11 23:14 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 08:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-12 01:35 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 09:28 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-12 08:40 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 09:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-12 09:00 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 10:24 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-12 09:46 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 11:38 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-12 16:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 10:30 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-12 22:51 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 17:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 00:39 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 19:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 04:11 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-12 22:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 00:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 11:16 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 10:44 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-13 11:34 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-13 12:46 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 14:09 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 20:46 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 15:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 23:41 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 21:00 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 11:05 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 14:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 22:47 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 16:54 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-13 23:44 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 21:11 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 11:29 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-14 12:34 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 13:59 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-14 16:41 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 12:10 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 00:48 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 19:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 02:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 23:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 17:49 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 14:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 22:34 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 16:49 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V38 (x86 is Turing Complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 23:40 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-14 21:27 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-15 12:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (X86 is Turing Complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 09:13 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 17:25 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 12:07 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 20:31 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-15 13:38 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 14:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-15 21:23 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 22:05 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-16 00:33 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 02:07 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-15 16:04 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V39 (x86 is Turing Complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 13:28 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-13 15:14 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 18:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-13 16:26 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based UTM) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 18:44 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 17:54 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 01:05 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 00:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 20:22 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 16:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 22:59 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 17:45 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 02:36 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 21:07 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 13:23 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 10:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 17:41 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 12:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 20:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 14:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 20:52 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V40 (x86 is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 15:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V40 (x86 is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 22:23 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 16:44 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-17 00:07 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 18:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-17 00:44 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 10:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-17 09:35 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 12:16 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-17 10:53 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 13:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-17 12:19 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 16:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-17 18:12 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 13:43 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 16:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 00:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 16:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 14:49 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 17:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 17:08 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 20:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 20:47 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 23:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 22:47 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 01:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 00:30 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 10:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-24 11:40 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 13:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-24 13:23 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 16:02 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-24 20:30 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 09:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 08:56 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 10:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 09:59 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 12:00 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 12:39 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 14:37 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 20:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-16 16:01 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 18:13 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-20 19:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 00:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-21 11:20 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 09:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-21 12:17 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 13:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-21 14:14 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 16:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 01:10 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 19:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 03:06 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 21:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-21 19:47 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 22:00 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-21 20:12 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 22:22 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 22:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 11:28 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 10:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 22:24 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 17:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 23:36 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 18:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 02:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 22:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 00:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 13:00 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 08:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 16:42 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 11:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 22:14 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 16:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-24 01:38 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 21:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 21:22 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 23:54 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 00:05 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 18:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 01:59 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 20:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 21:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 03:54 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 01:38 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 03:37 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 09:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 08:34 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 11:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 10:28 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 12:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 12:30 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 13:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 12:50 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 15:14 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 12:29 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 14:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 12:54 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 15:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 13:38 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 16:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 23:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 18:01 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 17:07 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 20:07 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 16:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 15:40 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 18:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 17:31 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 19:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 03:37 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 22:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 12:58 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 09:38 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 17:36 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 12:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 20:43 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 15:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 22:40 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2020-08-26 18:28 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 12:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 19:41 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 14:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 21:17 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 15:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 22:37 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 16:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 15:41 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 18:15 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 17:32 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 19:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (Chris Rock Speaks for God) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 20:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 10:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 10:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 10:25 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 09:39 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 11:25 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 10:42 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 11:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 11:45 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-28 17:52 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 12:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 11:19 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 12:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 22:34 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 03:06 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 08:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-29 07:44 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 09:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-29 08:58 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 10:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-30 07:38 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Turing Equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 11:11 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 10:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 17:47 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 12:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 14:01 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 20:03 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 14:48 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 21:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 16:00 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 23:32 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 18:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 02:24 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 21:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 23:15 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 22:57 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-29 22:13 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 23:27 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-30 03:27 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 16:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 23:53 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 18:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 02:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 21:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 15:38 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 11:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 20:05 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 14:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 14:37 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-30 13:10 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 15:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-30 14:22 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 16:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-31 02:48 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 02:08 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 09:49 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 13:59 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 16:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 15:24 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-31 19:26 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 21:37 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-31 23:56 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 23:10 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-01 02:28 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-09-01 02:02 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-01 03:16 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-09-01 02:29 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-31 08:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-01 00:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 00:23 +0100
                Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 19:17 -0500
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 09:59 +0100
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-31 08:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 02:16 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-08-30 20:43 -0400
                Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 20:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-30 07:27 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 10:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 01:24 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Making "C" Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 14:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 10:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 17:51 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 12:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 22:12 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 16:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 16:19 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (Honest dialogue?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 18:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (Honest dialogue?) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 17:55 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (Honest dialogue?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 20:14 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-13 07:45 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-13 10:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-09 22:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V35 (Semantically Incorrect Defined) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-09 22:26 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-09 23:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-09 23:28 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 00:43 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-10 00:19 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 09:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-10 08:34 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 10:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-10 09:31 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-10 10:56 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V36 (x86 based Turing Machines) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-10 10:31 -0600

(Thread has 557 articles, showing 500 — browse group in flat view)

csiph-web