Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.theory > #140790
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic, comp.theory, sci.math, comp.ai.philosophy |
| Subject | Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction |
| Date | 2026-04-16 07:36 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10rql5b$1mapc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (24 earlier) <10rkksl$3t92u$1@dont-email.me> <10rlgir$56j4$2@dont-email.me> <10rncn3$n96k$1@dont-email.me> <10rnuei$sa7t$1@dont-email.me> <10rq6fn$1i3pv$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 4/16/2026 3:26 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 15/04/2026 14:57, olcott wrote: >> On 4/15/2026 1:54 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 14/04/2026 16:48, olcott wrote: >>>> >>>> It is known that the truth value of the Goldbach >>>> conjecture is unknown this is out-of-scope for >>>> >>>> "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language" >>>> reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge. >>> >>> If there is a finite back-chained interference path from Goldbach >>> conjecture to the body of knowledge then how it is out of scope ? >> >> The current path is not finite. >> The current path is to search every even >> natural number greater than 2 to see if >> it is the sum of two prime numbers. > > An inifinite paths are irrelevant to the question, My 28 year goal has been to make "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language" reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge. *The above has been the question for 28 years* The truth value of the Goldbach conjecture is outside the scope of the body of knowledge. -- Copyright 2026 Olcott My 28 year goal has been to make "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language" reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge. The complete structure of this system is now defined. This required establishing a new foundation
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 15:58 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-02 19:43 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-03 10:13 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 08:35 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-04 10:53 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-04 11:23 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-04 14:55 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-05 10:05 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-05 06:25 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-05 08:05 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-05 12:01 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-06 11:27 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 06:21 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-07 11:00 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-07 09:49 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-08 10:08 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 06:52 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 09:13 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:17 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 08:34 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-10 10:30 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 06:18 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 06:04 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 09:31 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 17:09 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 21:04 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 21:59 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 01:09 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 08:49 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 07:08 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 10:01 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-11 12:27 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-10 09:53 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 10:30 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 09:14 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-11 12:35 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 12:26 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 08:17 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:03 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-13 09:24 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 08:55 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 08:48 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-15 09:54 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 06:57 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-16 11:26 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 07:36 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 10:10 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 12:27 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 12:36 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 10:47 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 10:57 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 11:18 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 11:26 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 13:24 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 11:45 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 11:59 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 14:47 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 17:04 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 19:41 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 00:49 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 09:04 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 07:52 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 09:58 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 08:14 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 11:53 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 17:24 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 20:43 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 19:13 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 21:25 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 19:32 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 21:42 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 21:28 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 11:54 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-17 11:12 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 08:19 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-18 12:13 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-19 09:15 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-19 10:07 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-17 09:45 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 09:29 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-18 12:15 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 07:59 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-19 11:54 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 07:58 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-19 11:59 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-19 12:21 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-19 13:58 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-02 13:39 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-03 10:53 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-03 02:09 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-04 09:15 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-04 00:53 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-05 11:25 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-05 02:28 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-06 10:55 +0300
a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-06 12:40 -0700
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-07 10:18 +0300
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-07 02:00 -0700
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-08 10:19 +0300
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-08 09:06 -0700
Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 11:58 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-08 10:13 -0700
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 12:35 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-08 11:40 -0700
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-08 14:01 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-10 13:06 -0700
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 14:12 -0600
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 21:14 -0700
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 15:17 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-09 11:10 +0300
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-09 11:30 +0300
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 07:13 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-10 10:10 +0300
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 12:38 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-10 14:06 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-11 10:24 +0300
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-11 06:44 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-12 10:05 +0300
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-12 08:32 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-05-12 21:02 -0600
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 06:18 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-05-13 05:56 -0600
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 09:20 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-05-13 08:38 -0600
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 10:28 -0500
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-13 12:14 +0300
Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-13 06:32 -0500
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-09 11:26 +0300
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-12 20:41 -0700
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-13 12:31 +0300
Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-05-13 08:00 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-20 11:49 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 08:31 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-21 09:30 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 08:22 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-22 10:03 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 02:45 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-23 09:35 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-23 08:32 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-24 09:08 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 10:01 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-25 11:18 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-25 07:19 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-26 11:17 +0300
The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Catches Liars olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-26 08:37 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Catches Liars Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-26 20:09 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Catches Liars Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-27 12:04 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Catches Liars olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-27 09:38 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Catches Liars Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-28 10:51 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Catches Liars olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-28 07:22 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Catches Liars Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-29 09:51 +0300
The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 11:24 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-25 11:20 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-25 07:25 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-26 11:09 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-26 08:22 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-26 20:14 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-27 12:22 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-27 09:47 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-28 10:55 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-28 07:24 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-29 09:57 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-30 11:04 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:08 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 08:35 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-10 09:57 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 11:06 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 09:27 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-11 12:36 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 12:32 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 08:22 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:05 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-13 09:52 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-13 19:15 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 08:59 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 08:50 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-15 09:58 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 06:59 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-16 11:30 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-16 07:37 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 09:34 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 08:15 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 10:49 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:06 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 11:17 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:35 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:58 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 12:18 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 10:33 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 12:43 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 10:51 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 13:09 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 11:53 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 08:45 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-15 10:07 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 07:02 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-04-15 10:51 -0600
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 10:02 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 12:24 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-04-15 13:13 -0600
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 15:37 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 14:04 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 16:39 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-04-15 15:40 -0600
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 17:14 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Full PTS basis "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 22:11 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-16 11:33 +0300
I will write a new paper anchoring my ideas in proof theoretic semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 07:52 -0500
Re: I will write a new paper anchoring my ideas in proof theoretic semantics Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-17 09:52 +0300
Re: I will write a new paper anchoring my ideas in proof theoretic semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 09:34 -0500
Re: I will write a new paper anchoring my ideas in proof theoretic semantics Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-18 12:19 +0300
Re: I will write a new paper anchoring my ideas in proof theoretic semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 08:28 -0500
Re: I will write a new paper anchoring my ideas in proof theoretic semantics Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-19 12:01 +0300
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 14:34 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 15:10 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 18:02 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 17:53 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-04 02:40 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-04 20:03 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-04 22:31 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-04 20:44 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-05 06:15 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-05 08:07 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-05 08:30 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 12:09 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 12:26 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 12:35 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 13:46 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 15:31 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 17:14 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-04-06 20:00 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-07 00:07 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-07 12:19 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-07 12:42 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-07 13:00 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 18:33 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-07 19:46 +0000
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 18:34 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 18:34 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-09 12:46 +0000
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 10:14 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 12:55 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 17:43 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-04-09 23:01 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 16:24 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-04-10 16:36 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 14:11 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 14:12 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 16:16 -0500
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2026-04-11 23:09 -0400
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-12 12:12 +0000
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 12:56 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 14:08 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 12:53 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 15:29 -0700
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-04-24 14:15 +0100
Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 09:41 -0500
The notion of a "well founded justification tree" <is> fully elaborated olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 09:54 -0500
csiph-web