Re: Nodename issue

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.sun.admin
Subject	Re: Nodename issue
Date	Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:43:16 +0200
Lines	12
Message-ID	<con3e4Fu0unU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<cofc56Fu87rU1@mid.individual.net> <mg0inc$57e$2@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1504071531220.423@new-host-3> <552462AC.AD63534C@nomail.com> <cokh81F9l5iU1@mid.individual.net> <552510b1$0$2945$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <cokmg7FavnsU1@mid.individual.net> <55252745$0$2854$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <55256831.609DB804@nomail.com> <colbg4FgkueU1@mid.individual.net> <5525a03d$0$2894$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <con2adFtnakU1@mid.individual.net> <55265533.268AE0FA@nomail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net KFefIXFuLI+MJ2r/aKXupAPG2GjIGysfPrYcv3Zh0jmrQ79EB1
Cancel-Lock	sha1:8VWqfhBA5VlI0ixUqHq5p8hmkSc=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
In-Reply-To	<55265533.268AE0FA@nomail.com>
Xref	csiph.com comp.sys.sun.admin:248

Show key headers only | View raw

Am 04/09/2015 12:32 PM, schrieb Gary:
> Is it possible that this is a different DHCP server you're dealing with now?

No, same router with different IP. The DHCP address range has changed
too. Maybe this is important.
Connecting with a newly set up OS and calling for DHCP seems to be
different from re-conncting to the same router, since nothing on the
Sparc has changed.


Michael

Back to comp.sys.sun.admin | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-06 14:23 +0200
  Re: Nodename issue Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2015-04-07 12:31 +0000
    Re: Nodename issue mmoel <mic1@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 15:48 +0200
      Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-07 19:05 -0400
        Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 13:20 +0200
          Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 11:27 +0000
            Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 14:50 +0200
              Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 13:04 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-08 13:41 -0400
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 20:48 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 21:40 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:24 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-09 06:32 -0400
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:43 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:34 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-09 11:27 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 14:21 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-09 12:48 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 16:13 +0200
              Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-08 13:35 -0400

csiph-web