Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.sun.admin > #246

Re: Nodename issue

Show all headers | View raw

Is it possible that this is a different DHCP server you're dealing with now?

Michael Moeller wrote:

> Am 04/08/2015 11:40 PM, schrieb Casper H.S. Dik:
>  > Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> writes:
>  >
>  >> /etc/default/dhcp is called /etc/dhcp/dhcptags on Solais 2.6.
>  >> Param 12 deals with the hostname, though. There are some remarks
>  >> which strongly discourage messing around with the settings.
>  >
>  > If you don't want to receive a hostname, you should not ask
>  > for it.
>  >
>
> Understood. Makes sense.
>
>  >> Why it worked before I assigned a new address to the router still
>  >> is the big question.
>  >
>  > I'm not sure exactly what you did before?
>  >
>
> Thats easy, because I wrote it down back then.
> I set up Solaris 2.6, put the empty files hostname.le0 and dhcp.le0
> in /etc, default router IP goes to /etc/defaultrouter and the ISPs
> addresses in /etc/resolv.conf. After reboot I've got DHCP running with
> the real hostname like any of the PCs and Macs with a recent OS.
>
> By default at setup Sol 2.6 asks for a hostname and a static IP.
> These were used by the router as entries for its DHCP table. After
> changing the routers IP, it's not working any more.
>
>  >> Could it be DHCP behaves different on a subnet router compared to
>  >> one running PPPoE at the WAN side? Newer machines can handle this
>  >> while the Sun can't?
>  >
>  > Please dump the DHCP packet and see what it contains; if it
>  > contains a hostname, Sun will use it because is wants to
>  > use.
>
> Ok, I'll try this with another Sparc.
> Meanwhile I gave it a static IP, so work continues. I'd like
> to understand what's going on, though.
>
>  > You are complaining that an 18 year old OS isn't as capable
>  > as a more modern OS?  Really?
>
> Yes, because it worked before I changed the routers IP there
> must be a way to accomplish this.
>
> Michael

Back to comp.sys.sun.admin | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-06 14:23 +0200
  Re: Nodename issue Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2015-04-07 12:31 +0000
    Re: Nodename issue mmoel <mic1@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 15:48 +0200
      Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-07 19:05 -0400
        Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 13:20 +0200
          Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 11:27 +0000
            Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 14:50 +0200
              Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 13:04 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-08 13:41 -0400
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 20:48 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 21:40 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:24 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-09 06:32 -0400
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:43 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:34 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-09 11:27 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 14:21 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-09 12:48 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 16:13 +0200
              Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-08 13:35 -0400

csiph-web