Re: Nodename issue

From	Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.sun.admin
Subject	Re: Nodename issue
Date	2015-04-09 16:13 +0200
Message-ID	<confnkF2m8aU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <5525a03d$0$2894$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <con2adFtnakU1@mid.individual.net> <5526622f$0$2966$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <con961F10m6U1@mid.individual.net> <5526751d$0$2824$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 04/09/2015 02:48 PM, schrieb Casper H.S. Dik:
> Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> writes:
>
>> Because of a change from ADSL2+ to VDSL the first router had to
>> be replaced (it also drives the phone installation now). So the
>> formerly first router (192.168.1.1) changed to be the second
>> (now 192.168.3.1). The new one calls itself 192.168.2.1 by default,
>> so I didn't change it.
>
> So the SPARC system needs to change its IP address too. (It will need
> to ask for an address in 192.168.2.0)
>
> Casper
>
You are right. But now I have to go off-topic.
Normally the second router isn't needed at all, as long as you grant
third party access to any TR-069 capable device on your net, A
sub-router with no or disabled TR-069 support and his own IP is
recommended in case you don't want this. Disabling TR-069 on the router
given by the ISP is a violation of contract. At least where I live.


Michael

Back to comp.sys.sun.admin | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-06 14:23 +0200
  Re: Nodename issue Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2015-04-07 12:31 +0000
    Re: Nodename issue mmoel <mic1@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 15:48 +0200
      Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-07 19:05 -0400
        Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 13:20 +0200
          Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 11:27 +0000
            Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 14:50 +0200
              Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 13:04 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-08 13:41 -0400
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 20:48 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-08 21:40 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:24 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-09 06:32 -0400
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:43 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:34 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-09 11:27 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 14:21 +0200
                Re: Nodename issue Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2015-04-09 12:48 +0000
                Re: Nodename issue Michael Moeller <mmoel@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 16:13 +0200
              Re: Nodename issue Gary <nobody@nomail.com> - 2015-04-08 13:35 -0400

csiph-web