Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #99445 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-03 15:45 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-02-08 17:22 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 374 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-03 15:45 -0800
Wrong group... (was Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-03 16:48 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 03:20 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-03 23:12 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 06:18 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 03:58 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-04 09:26 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 16:05 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 16:04 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-04 18:30 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 17:48 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-04 18:59 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 18:16 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-04 20:03 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-04 15:31 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-04 17:50 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-05 08:40 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 11:11 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-04 12:30 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 12:37 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-04 13:31 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 17:06 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-04 16:33 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 20:00 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-04 17:06 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-04 18:14 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 21:32 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-04 18:38 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 21:47 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-04 19:06 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:18 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:17 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-05 15:14 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:19 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 18:11 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-05 16:43 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-05 09:51 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-05 15:14 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:20 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:18 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:16 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-05 16:48 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-05 13:12 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-05 15:14 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-05 13:29 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:29 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-07 18:40 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:30 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-05 15:14 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:30 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:31 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-08 23:32 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:32 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:31 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:32 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 05:21 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 18:09 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 18:11 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:21 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-10 11:30 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-10 12:05 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-12 16:59 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 03:25 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-13 02:00 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-13 12:23 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 17:49 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-14 10:11 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-05 15:14 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-05 13:30 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:34 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-07 18:39 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 19:57 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:33 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:36 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:33 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:11 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 14:52 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 23:00 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-07 20:02 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-09 10:05 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:34 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:32 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:36 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:13 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-05 21:42 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-07 18:39 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:34 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 18:09 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:12 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Lloyd Parsons <email@domain.com> - 2017-02-04 12:18 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 13:21 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-04 13:30 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-04 17:06 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-04 16:32 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:19 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-05 15:14 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:38 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-07 18:38 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-08 13:46 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 11:54 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-08 14:18 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 12:54 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:38 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:46 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:37 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-08 19:05 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-08 20:08 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:14 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-09 09:55 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:36 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-08 11:23 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:35 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:35 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 18:09 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-09 17:09 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-04 17:51 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-05 01:44 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-05 08:39 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-05 16:52 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:10 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-06 14:14 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-04 12:52 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Lloyd Parsons <email@domain.com> - 2017-02-04 12:20 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:20 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2017-02-04 18:02 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2017-02-05 06:12 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-05 22:06 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-04 16:19 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-05 00:32 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-05 16:51 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-05 17:21 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-06 09:55 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-06 21:10 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 10:20 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-07 17:58 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 18:35 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-08 22:53 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-08 20:57 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 05:22 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-09 08:41 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-06 14:17 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-08 23:40 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-09 10:11 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-16 01:35 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-16 12:00 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-16 08:05 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-16 16:23 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-16 12:27 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-16 15:32 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-16 12:38 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-16 15:42 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-16 12:44 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-16 21:51 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-16 16:15 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-16 13:33 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-17 14:38 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-17 12:01 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-17 10:02 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 19:08 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-17 01:25 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Fred Moore <fmoore@gfcn.huh> - 2017-02-17 14:54 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-18 11:58 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-20 11:41 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-20 11:40 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 14:09 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-21 10:24 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-21 15:36 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-22 07:01 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 19:05 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-16 23:19 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-16 22:50 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 06:35 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 06:36 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 06:45 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-17 16:50 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-18 11:15 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 16:31 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-18 22:27 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-18 15:23 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 01:49 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-19 19:05 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-19 09:30 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-19 22:18 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-19 14:08 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-19 16:55 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-20 10:37 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 06:22 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-20 10:16 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 16:28 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 17:56 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 17:16 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 19:01 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 18:08 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-20 18:41 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 19:53 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 19:37 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 20:57 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 20:23 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-20 18:42 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 19:49 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 19:34 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 20:54 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 20:23 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 20:25 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 21:41 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 21:27 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 20:40 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 21:45 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 17:45 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-20 15:46 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-21 07:00 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-20 22:09 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-21 06:19 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-21 07:50 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-21 15:32 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-21 07:49 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-21 15:33 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-21 07:50 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-21 16:04 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-21 19:07 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-21 19:46 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-21 21:00 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 17:44 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-21 15:42 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 18:00 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-21 19:12 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 23:22 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-21 21:28 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Andre G. Isaak" <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2017-02-20 10:05 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-20 17:25 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-21 10:18 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-20 11:55 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-20 14:09 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-20 11:44 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-17 01:15 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-17 11:51 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 18:29 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-17 09:56 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-17 01:36 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-16 16:38 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-17 11:57 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-17 02:03 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-17 17:42 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-16 20:09 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 06:40 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-17 16:48 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 18:30 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 19:02 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 20:46 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-05 16:28 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Lloyd Parsons <email@domain.com> - 2017-02-05 10:41 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-05 16:51 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-05 13:32 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... ElfinArc <elfinarc6@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 15:05 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:40 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-07 16:41 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-07 18:21 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Lloyd Parsons <email@domain.com> - 2017-02-07 12:33 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-07 18:36 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-07 19:00 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-07 21:31 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-07 21:47 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-07 21:55 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-07 22:12 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 16:11 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 16:11 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 10:33 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 10:31 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-08 09:07 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-08 14:51 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 10:26 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-08 09:06 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-08 14:45 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 10:24 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 16:40 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 14:47 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-08 13:46 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-09 09:55 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:21 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:21 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:31 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:19 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:08 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:22 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:28 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:27 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:26 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-08 09:02 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 09:10 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-08 16:35 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 09:52 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... android <here@there.was> - 2017-02-08 18:25 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... ElfinArc <elfinarc6@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 20:02 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 14:44 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-07 18:06 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-08 00:17 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 18:30 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 18:34 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 21:25 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-07 19:51 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-08 13:46 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 11:48 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-08 14:18 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 12:55 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:25 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:37 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:24 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:38 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:28 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:19 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:24 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:39 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:30 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 21:18 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-09 13:58 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 09:50 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-10 08:59 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-09 09:25 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 18:08 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-09 16:53 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-08 09:10 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... ElfinArc <elfinarc6@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 20:02 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-08 23:43 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-02-08 16:48 -0700
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-07 18:55 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 18:21 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-02-07 18:38 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 23:00 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-08 14:49 +1100
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:28 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:29 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-05 17:46 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-05 13:21 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jim Gibson <JimSGibson@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 15:50 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-05 17:30 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-06 09:57 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-06 21:13 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-04 18:52 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 18:15 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-04 21:15 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-04 22:15 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-05 16:22 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-02-05 16:38 +0000
Re: OT: "Every American"... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-02-05 01:52 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-05 16:55 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-04 16:15 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Lloyd Parsons <email@domain.com> - 2017-02-04 17:45 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-05 17:49 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-04 18:10 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-05 17:53 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-04 20:24 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-04 21:34 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-04 22:53 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2017-02-05 17:01 +0100
Re: OT: "Every American"... Lloyd Parsons <email@domain.com> - 2017-02-05 10:39 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-05 15:14 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 21:55 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-02-06 19:35 -0800
Re: OT: "Every American"... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 18:41 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2017-02-05 18:01 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 06:23 -0500
Re: OT: "Every American"... "Ed H." <phoney@bogus.com> - 2017-02-08 11:02 -0600
Re: OT: "Every American"... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2017-02-08 17:22 +0000
Page 6 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 19 Next page →
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-06 21:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7bbr7$89j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #99617 |
On 2017-02-05 15:14:51 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said: > In article <o771jv$52k$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> He did absolutely **everything** humanly possible to show us that he >>>>>> was completely unqualified, unsuited, and unfit to hold the office of >>>>>> the Presidency. >>>>> >>>>> not as much as clinton did, who showed that she was even *less* >>>>> qualified, including lying under oath and paying off the fbi director >>>>> to not prosecute her. >>>> >>>> You of course realize you have no clue, right? >>> >>> more than you do. >>> >>>> 1. You have no clue that Comey acted in any way improperly to benefit >>>> Clinton. >>> >>> the simple fact he didn't prosecute her is proof. had anyone other than >>> her done the same thing, they'd be in jail. >>> >>>> 2. The fact of his second announcement just before the election makes it >>>> look far more like the whole thing was a setup to hurt her improperly at >>>> the worse possible moment. >>> >>> because he knew what she did. >> >> he didn't > > if he really didn't know what she did, then he's unfit to be the > director of the fbi, who, along with a team of agents, supposedly > investigated her. how could he not know? How can you not know? Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. -- REP. JOHN DUNCAN (R): "Do you understand that great numbers of people feel, now, that there's one standard of justice for the Clintons and another for regular people?" COMEY: "Yeah, I've heard that a lot... it's NOT TRUE, but I've heard it a lot."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 21:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <070220172103396600%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #99721 |
In article <o7bbr7$89j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> 1. You have no clue that Comey acted in any way improperly to benefit > >>>> Clinton. > >>> > >>> the simple fact he didn't prosecute her is proof. had anyone other than > >>> her done the same thing, they'd be in jail. > >>> > >>>> 2. The fact of his second announcement just before the election makes it > >>>> look far more like the whole thing was a setup to hurt her improperly at > >>>> the worse possible moment. > >>> > >>> because he knew what she did. > >> > >> he didn't > > > > if he really didn't know what she did, then he's unfit to be the > > director of the fbi, who, along with a team of agents, supposedly > > investigated her. how could he not know? > > How can you not know? > > Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in front of congress.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 18:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o7e0bn$n89$2@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #99807 |
On 2017-02-07 6:03 PM, nospam wrote: > In article <o7bbr7$89j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> 1. You have no clue that Comey acted in any way improperly to benefit >>>>>> Clinton. >>>>> >>>>> the simple fact he didn't prosecute her is proof. had anyone other than >>>>> her done the same thing, they'd be in jail. >>>>> >>>>>> 2. The fact of his second announcement just before the election makes it >>>>>> look far more like the whole thing was a setup to hurt her improperly at >>>>>> the worse possible moment. >>>>> >>>>> because he knew what she did. >>>> >>>> he didn't >>> >>> if he really didn't know what she did, then he's unfit to be the >>> director of the fbi, who, along with a team of agents, supposedly >>> investigated her. how could he not know? >> >> How can you not know? >> >> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. > > the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. Quote this lie... > > i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the > clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in > front of congress.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 13:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <080220171346193651%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #99818 |
In article <o7e0bn$n89$2@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: > >> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. > > > > the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. > > Quote this lie... > > > i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the > > clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in > > front of congress. that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 11:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #99928 |
On 2/8/17, 11:46 AM, in article 080220171346193651%nospam@nospam.invalid, "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <o7e0bn$n89$2@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker > <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: > >>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>> >>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >> >> Quote this lie... >> >>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>> front of congress. > > that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where > he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. Such as...??? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 14:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #99934 |
In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. > >>> > >>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. > >> > >> Quote this lie... > >> > >>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the > >>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in > >>> front of congress. > > > > that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where > > he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. > > Such as...??? comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try everything. he lied. he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by contracting with a well established forensics company. why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? clearly they had not tried everything. comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. that was pure bullshit. it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. there were several other instances during his many hours long testimony where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted what he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the hearing itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of their own false claims). when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep changing, you know you're dealing with liars. he lied under oath. simple as that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 12:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4C0C578.8F1DE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #99941 |
On 2/8/17, 12:18 PM, in article 080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid, "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>>>> >>>>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >>>> >>>> Quote this lie... >>>> >>>>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>>>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>>>> front of congress. >>> >>> that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where >>> he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. >> >> Such as...??? > > comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the > san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try > everything. he lied. > > he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they > could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so > rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. > > then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by > contracting with a well established forensics company. > > why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? > > clearly they had not tried everything. > > comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the > phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. > that was pure bullshit. > > it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called > the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev > team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of > the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the > fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be > told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. > > there were several other instances during his many hours long testimony > where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted what > he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the hearing > itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of > their own false claims). > > when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep > changing, you know you're dealing with liars. > > he lied under oath. simple as that. I did not watch that testimony, but when people say they have tried everything it is not meant to be taken literally. I doubt, for example, they did shamanic rituals or sang lullabies to it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 18:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7ga37$kjs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #99946 |
On 2017-02-08 14:54:16 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: > On 2/8/17, 12:18 PM, in article 080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid, > "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>>>>> >>>>>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >>>>> >>>>> Quote this lie... >>>>> >>>>>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>>>>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>>>>> front of congress. >>>> >>>> that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where >>>> he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. >>> >>> Such as...??? >> >> comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the >> san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try >> everything. he lied. >> >> he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they >> could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so >> rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. >> >> then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by >> contracting with a well established forensics company. >> >> why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? >> >> clearly they had not tried everything. >> >> comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the >> phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. >> that was pure bullshit. >> >> it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called >> the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev >> team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of >> the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the >> fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be >> told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. >> >> there were several other instances during his many hours long testimony >> where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted what >> he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the hearing >> itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of >> their own false claims). >> >> when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep >> changing, you know you're dealing with liars. >> >> he lied under oath. simple as that. > > I did not watch that testimony, but when people say they have tried > everything it is not meant to be taken literally. I doubt, for example, they > did shamanic rituals or sang lullabies to it. He's nuts, you know... When asked if Comey had finished his lunch, he said "Yes. I ate everything". Another obvious lie, as he had not actually eaten "everything". I know because I also ate afterward, and I had plenty! -- "I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and everyone knows it. Some FAKE NEWS media, in order to marginalize, lies! -2017 "WAR IS PEACE." "FREEDOM IS SLAVERY." "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!" -1984 Eric Arthur Blair
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 16:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4C0FBD7.8F26A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #100003 |
On 2/8/17, 4:38 PM, in article o7ga37$kjs$1@dont-email.me, "FPP" <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2017-02-08 14:54:16 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: > >> On 2/8/17, 12:18 PM, in article 080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid, >> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >>>>>> >>>>>> Quote this lie... >>>>>> >>>>>>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>>>>>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>>>>>> front of congress. >>>>> >>>>> that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where >>>>> he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. >>>> >>>> Such as...??? >>> >>> comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the >>> san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try >>> everything. he lied. >>> >>> he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they >>> could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so >>> rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. >>> >>> then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by >>> contracting with a well established forensics company. >>> >>> why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? >>> >>> clearly they had not tried everything. >>> >>> comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the >>> phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. >>> that was pure bullshit. >>> >>> it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called >>> the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev >>> team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of >>> the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the >>> fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be >>> told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. >>> >>> there were several other instances during his many hours long testimony >>> where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted what >>> he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the hearing >>> itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of >>> their own false claims). >>> >>> when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep >>> changing, you know you're dealing with liars. >>> >>> he lied under oath. simple as that. >> >> I did not watch that testimony, but when people say they have tried >> everything it is not meant to be taken literally. I doubt, for example, they >> did shamanic rituals or sang lullabies to it. > > He's nuts, you know... > > When asked if Comey had finished his lunch, he said "Yes. I ate everything". > > Another obvious lie, as he had not actually eaten "everything". I know > because I also ate afterward, and I had plenty! He was asked to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. He did not tell ALL truths... thus not the whole truth. He lied! What is amazing is Clinton supporters loved him when he opted to not indict. At first I was not happy with that decision but before attacking him I listened to the testimony. While I can see where others would disagree, I found it convincing and -- even though it was not the outcome I wanted -- I defended him as seemingly honorable. Clinton supporters loved it. But then I noted what he actually said... they do not like that much. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 21:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7gkij$fgb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #100006 |
On 2017-02-08 18:46:15 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: > On 2/8/17, 4:38 PM, in article o7ga37$kjs$1@dont-email.me, "FPP" > <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2017-02-08 14:54:16 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: >> >>> On 2/8/17, 12:18 PM, in article 080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid, >>> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Quote this lie... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>>>>>>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>>>>>>> front of congress. >>>>>> >>>>>> that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where >>>>>> he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. >>>>> >>>>> Such as...??? >>>> >>>> comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the >>>> san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try >>>> everything. he lied. >>>> >>>> he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they >>>> could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so >>>> rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. >>>> >>>> then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by >>>> contracting with a well established forensics company. >>>> >>>> why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? >>>> >>>> clearly they had not tried everything. >>>> >>>> comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the >>>> phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. >>>> that was pure bullshit. >>>> >>>> it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called >>>> the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev >>>> team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of >>>> the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the >>>> fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be >>>> told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. >>>> >>>> there were several other instances during his many hours long testimony >>>> where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted what >>>> he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the hearing >>>> itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of >>>> their own false claims). >>>> >>>> when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep >>>> changing, you know you're dealing with liars. >>>> >>>> he lied under oath. simple as that. >>> >>> I did not watch that testimony, but when people say they have tried >>> everything it is not meant to be taken literally. I doubt, for example, they >>> did shamanic rituals or sang lullabies to it. >> >> He's nuts, you know... >> >> When asked if Comey had finished his lunch, he said "Yes. I ate everything". >> >> Another obvious lie, as he had not actually eaten "everything". I know >> because I also ate afterward, and I had plenty! > > He was asked to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. > He did not tell ALL truths... thus not the whole truth. He lied! > > What is amazing is Clinton supporters loved him when he opted to not indict. > At first I was not happy with that decision but before attacking him I > listened to the testimony. While I can see where others would disagree, I > found it convincing and -- even though it was not the outcome I wanted -- I > defended him as seemingly honorable. Clinton supporters loved it. > > But then I noted what he actually said... they do not like that much. Comey violated Justice Department rules. More than once. He commented on an ongoing case, he made a public statement, he addressed Congress, and sent follow-up letters in violation of Justice Dept regs and direct advice from his superiors and watchdogs. And, yet, when he had info on Trump weeks before the Hillary matter, he refused to make any of it known because he thought it was too close to the election and might sway voters and public opinion. The EXACT opposite of what he did with the Clinton info. He's a Republican, and he acted like it. He has ZERO credibility any more. -- "I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and everyone knows it. Some FAKE NEWS media, in order to marginalize, lies! -2017 "WAR IS PEACE." "FREEDOM IS SLAVERY." "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!" -1984 Eric Arthur Blair
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 19:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o7gmah$de2$2@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #100040 |
On 2017-02-08 6:37 PM, FPP wrote: > On 2017-02-08 18:46:15 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: > >> On 2/8/17, 4:38 PM, in article o7ga37$kjs$1@dont-email.me, "FPP" >> <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2017-02-08 14:54:16 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: >>> >>>> On 2/8/17, 12:18 PM, in article >>>> 080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid, >>>> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no >>>>>>>>>> contest. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied >>>>>>>>> under oath. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Quote this lie... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath >>>>>>>>> and in >>>>>>>>> front of congress. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, >>>>>>> where >>>>>>> he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Such as...??? >>>>> >>>>> comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the >>>>> san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try >>>>> everything. he lied. >>>>> >>>>> he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they >>>>> could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so >>>>> rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. >>>>> >>>>> then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by >>>>> contracting with a well established forensics company. >>>>> >>>>> why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? >>>>> >>>>> clearly they had not tried everything. >>>>> >>>>> comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the >>>>> phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. >>>>> that was pure bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called >>>>> the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev >>>>> team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of >>>>> the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the >>>>> fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be >>>>> told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. >>>>> >>>>> there were several other instances during his many hours long >>>>> testimony >>>>> where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted >>>>> what >>>>> he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the >>>>> hearing >>>>> itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of >>>>> their own false claims). >>>>> >>>>> when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep >>>>> changing, you know you're dealing with liars. >>>>> >>>>> he lied under oath. simple as that. >>>> >>>> I did not watch that testimony, but when people say they have tried >>>> everything it is not meant to be taken literally. I doubt, for >>>> example, they >>>> did shamanic rituals or sang lullabies to it. >>> >>> He's nuts, you know... >>> >>> When asked if Comey had finished his lunch, he said "Yes. I ate >>> everything". >>> >>> Another obvious lie, as he had not actually eaten "everything". I know >>> because I also ate afterward, and I had plenty! >> >> He was asked to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the >> truth. >> He did not tell ALL truths... thus not the whole truth. He lied! >> >> What is amazing is Clinton supporters loved him when he opted to not >> indict. >> At first I was not happy with that decision but before attacking him I >> listened to the testimony. While I can see where others would disagree, I >> found it convincing and -- even though it was not the outcome I wanted >> -- I >> defended him as seemingly honorable. Clinton supporters loved it. >> >> But then I noted what he actually said... they do not like that much. > > Comey violated Justice Department rules. More than once. He commented > on an ongoing case, he made a public statement, he addressed Congress, > and sent follow-up letters in violation of Justice Dept regs and direct > advice from his superiors and watchdogs. > > And, yet, when he had info on Trump weeks before the Hillary matter, he > refused to make any of it known because he thought it was too close to > the election and might sway voters and public opinion. > > The EXACT opposite of what he did with the Clinton info. > He's a Republican, and he acted like it. He has ZERO credibility any more. As an interesting point... If James Comey acted so very badly with bias in favour of Clinton... ...why does he still have his job? <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/us/politics/trump-comey-fbi-director-.html>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 20:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2017020820084677844-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
| In reply to | #100041 |
On 2017-02-09 03:05:53 +0000, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> said: > On 2017-02-08 6:37 PM, FPP wrote: >> On 2017-02-08 18:46:15 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: >> >>> On 2/8/17, 4:38 PM, in article o7ga37$kjs$1@dont-email.me, "FPP" >>> <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2017-02-08 14:54:16 -0500, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> said: >>>> >>>>> On 2/8/17, 12:18 PM, in article >>>>> 080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid, >>>>> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no >>>>>>>>>>> contest. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied >>>>>>>>>> under oath. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Quote this lie... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath >>>>>>>>>> and in >>>>>>>>>> front of congress. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, >>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>> he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Such as...??? >>>>>> >>>>>> comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the >>>>>> san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try >>>>>> everything. he lied. >>>>>> >>>>>> he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they >>>>>> could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so >>>>>> rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. >>>>>> >>>>>> then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by >>>>>> contracting with a well established forensics company. >>>>>> >>>>>> why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? >>>>>> >>>>>> clearly they had not tried everything. >>>>>> >>>>>> comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the >>>>>> phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. >>>>>> that was pure bullshit. >>>>>> >>>>>> it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called >>>>>> the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev >>>>>> team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of >>>>>> the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the >>>>>> fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be >>>>>> told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. >>>>>> >>>>>> there were several other instances during his many hours long >>>>>> testimony >>>>>> where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted >>>>>> what >>>>>> he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the >>>>>> hearing >>>>>> itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of >>>>>> their own false claims). >>>>>> >>>>>> when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep >>>>>> changing, you know you're dealing with liars. >>>>>> >>>>>> he lied under oath. simple as that. >>>>> >>>>> I did not watch that testimony, but when people say they have tried >>>>> everything it is not meant to be taken literally. I doubt, for >>>>> example, they >>>>> did shamanic rituals or sang lullabies to it. >>>> >>>> He's nuts, you know... >>>> >>>> When asked if Comey had finished his lunch, he said "Yes. I ate >>>> everything". >>>> >>>> Another obvious lie, as he had not actually eaten "everything". I know >>>> because I also ate afterward, and I had plenty! >>> >>> He was asked to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the >>> truth. >>> He did not tell ALL truths... thus not the whole truth. He lied! >>> >>> What is amazing is Clinton supporters loved him when he opted to not >>> indict. >>> At first I was not happy with that decision but before attacking him I >>> listened to the testimony. While I can see where others would disagree, I >>> found it convincing and -- even though it was not the outcome I wanted >>> -- I >>> defended him as seemingly honorable. Clinton supporters loved it. >>> >>> But then I noted what he actually said... they do not like that much. >> >> Comey violated Justice Department rules. More than once. He commented >> on an ongoing case, he made a public statement, he addressed Congress, >> and sent follow-up letters in violation of Justice Dept regs and direct >> advice from his superiors and watchdogs. >> >> And, yet, when he had info on Trump weeks before the Hillary matter, he >> refused to make any of it known because he thought it was too close to >> the election and might sway voters and public opinion. >> >> The EXACT opposite of what he did with the Clinton info. >> He's a Republican, and he acted like it. He has ZERO credibility any more. > > As an interesting point... > > If James Comey acted so very badly with bias in favour of Clinton... > > ...why does he still have his job? Bannon hasn't found a billionaire, neo-nazi, or white supremacist who wants the job. ...yet. -- Regards, Savageduck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 21:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4C13AD0.8F2F9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #100040 |
On 2/8/17, 7:37 PM, in article o7gkij$fgb$1@dont-email.me, "FPP" <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>> He's nuts, you know... >>> >>> When asked if Comey had finished his lunch, he said "Yes. I ate >>> everything". >>> >>> Another obvious lie, as he had not actually eaten "everything". I know >>> because I also ate afterward, and I had plenty! >> >> He was asked to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. >> He did not tell ALL truths... thus not the whole truth. He lied! >> >> What is amazing is Clinton supporters loved him when he opted to not indict. >> At first I was not happy with that decision but before attacking him I >> listened to the testimony. While I can see where others would disagree, I >> found it convincing and -- even though it was not the outcome I wanted -- I >> defended him as seemingly honorable. Clinton supporters loved it. >> >> But then I noted what he actually said... they do not like that much. > > Comey violated Justice Department rules. More than once. He commented > on an ongoing case, he made a public statement, he addressed Congress, > and sent follow-up letters in violation of Justice Dept regs and direct > advice from his superiors and watchdogs. By all means list the rules. Keep in mind, though, that if we look JUST at rules then it is clear Clinton broke the law in a way that should have made her disqualified from holding public office. So you have to not just show the law but also show the precedent that these rules and laws have lead to any problems for people. > And, yet, when he had info on Trump weeks before the Hillary matter, he > refused to make any of it known because he thought it was too close to > the election and might sway voters and public opinion. What case do you mean? > The EXACT opposite of what he did with the Clinton info. > He's a Republican, and he acted like it. He has ZERO credibility any more. He VERY easily could have pushed to indict and her supporters cheered him when he chose not to (and Clinton then promptly lied about what he said). The Democrats were idiots to push her as a candidate. They handed us Trump. Every one of her supporters has a hand in pushing Trump to the White House (I mean the ones who pushed her before she was the nominee). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-09 09:55 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-544270.09555909022017@46.sub-75-242-165.myvzw.com> |
| In reply to | #99941 |
In article <080220171418450383%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > he lied under oath. simple as that. Everything is simple for you, but then you are that sort of simple black and white sort of guy, aren't you? -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 18:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7g9ug$isu$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #99941 |
On 2017-02-08 14:18:45 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said: > In article <D4C0B787.8F1B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>>>> >>>>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >>>> >>>> Quote this lie... >>>> >>>>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>>>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>>>> front of congress. >>> >>> that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where >>> he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. >> >> Such as...??? > > comey claimed under oath that the fbi 'tried everything' to unlock the > san bernardino shooter's iphone. that was false. they did not try > everything. he lied. > > he also said under oath that only apple could unlock it and if they > could have unlocked it without apple's help, they would have done so > rather than file a lawsuit. another lie. > > then a few weeks after the hearing, the fbi suddenly 'found' a way by > contracting with a well established forensics company. > > why didn't they contact this company *before* the lawsuit? > > clearly they had not tried everything. > > comey also asked for people to call the fbi to help them unlock the > phone because maybe someone out there has an idea they had not tried. > that was pure bullshit. > > it turns out that several very knowledgeable people already had called > the fbi offering to assist them, including members of the iphone dev > team (who come up with the jailbreaks) and jonathan zdziarski, one of > the top ios security people on the planet (who also commented on the > fbi's numerous contradictions and completely bogus claims) only to be > told that the fbi had no interest in outside help. > > there were several other instances during his many hours long testimony > where what he said either did not match reality or it contradicted what > he had previously said, either prior to the hearing, during the hearing > itself or in the legal briefs that were filed (which also had many of > their own false claims). > > when people make easily disproven claims and have stories that keep > changing, you know you're dealing with liars. > > he lied under oath. simple as that. Simple as *you*. -- "Now Trump and his minions are in the driver’s seat, attempting to pose as respectable participants in American politics, when their views come out of a playbook written in German." -Ron Rosenbaum, Author of 'Explaining Hitler' https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/normalization-lesson-munich-post/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 11:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o7fr8d$tn6$2@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #99928 |
On 2017-02-08 10:46 AM, nospam wrote: > In article <o7e0bn$n89$2@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker > <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: > >>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>> >>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >> >> Quote this lie... >> >>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>> front of congress. > > that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where > he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. > You're the one making the claim... ...so produce some examples.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 18:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7g9t4$isu$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #99928 |
On 2017-02-08 13:46:19 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said: > In article <o7e0bn$n89$2@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker > <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: > >>>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >>> >>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >> >> Quote this lie... >> >>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>> front of congress. > > that's not a lie. watch/listen to his testimony before congress, where > he contradicts himself numerous times, *under* *oath*. Why don't you just show us? Hint: We KNOW why you won't show us... -- "Now Trump and his minions are in the driver’s seat, attempting to pose as respectable participants in American politics, when their views come out of a playbook written in German." -Ron Rosenbaum, Author of 'Explaining Hitler' https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/normalization-lesson-munich-post/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 18:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7g9rv$isu$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #99807 |
On 2017-02-07 21:03:39 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said: > In article <o7bbr7$89j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> 1. You have no clue that Comey acted in any way improperly to benefit >>>>>> Clinton. >>>>> >>>>> the simple fact he didn't prosecute her is proof. had anyone other than >>>>> her done the same thing, they'd be in jail. >>>>> >>>>>> 2. The fact of his second announcement just before the election makes it >>>>>> look far more like the whole thing was a setup to hurt her improperly at >>>>>> the worse possible moment. >>>>> >>>>> because he knew what she did. >>>> >>>> he didn't >>> >>> if he really didn't know what she did, then he's unfit to be the >>> director of the fbi, who, along with a team of agents, supposedly >>> investigated her. how could he not know? >> >> How can you not know? >> >> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. > > the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. > > i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the > clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in > front of congress. Then show where he lied. -- "Now Trump and his minions are in the driver’s seat, attempting to pose as respectable participants in American politics, when their views come out of a playbook written in German." -Ron Rosenbaum, Author of 'Explaining Hitler' https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/normalization-lesson-munich-post/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-09 18:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7isnp$unj$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #99997 |
On 2017-02-08 23:35:07 +0000, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> said: > On 2017-02-07 21:03:39 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said: > >> In article <o7bbr7$89j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> 1. You have no clue that Comey acted in any way improperly to benefit >>>>>>> Clinton. >>>>>> >>>>>> the simple fact he didn't prosecute her is proof. had anyone other than >>>>>> her done the same thing, they'd be in jail. >>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. The fact of his second announcement just before the election makes it >>>>>>> look far more like the whole thing was a setup to hurt her improperly at >>>>>>> the worse possible moment. >>>>>> >>>>>> because he knew what she did. >>>>> >>>>> he didn't >>>> >>>> if he really didn't know what she did, then he's unfit to be the >>>> director of the fbi, who, along with a team of agents, supposedly >>>> investigated her. how could he not know? >>> >>> How can you not know? >>> >>> Faced with the choice of believing the FBI or you, there is no contest. >> >> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >> >> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >> front of congress. > > Then show where he lied. Still waiting... -- "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty," -Thos. Jefferson Tiny hands... yoooge asshole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-09 17:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4C252B8.8F4EE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #100138 |
On 2/9/17, 4:09 PM, in article o7isnp$unj$7@dont-email.me, "FPP" <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>> the fbi is not immune to corruption and comey has also lied under oath. >>> >>> i watched him testify before congress for the apple-doj/fbi and the >>> clinton debacle. within minutes, he lied in both, under oath and in >>> front of congress. >> >> Then show where he lied. > > Still waiting... You keep posting that phrase as you discount ALL the content of Comey's testimony AND all of the following content about Clinton. Interesting. Just a small sampling of where Clinton has been deceptive or lied. * Her emails: she repeatedly claims she merely did what others have done but has yet to name even one other who had a private email server installed in their house. NO examples of someone truly doing as she did. She could argue that this allowed her to make the email more private and try to turn it into a positive, but her dishonesty on this at least makes it seem she has something to hide - perhaps emails that should be public that she does not want others to see. She also committed perjury and said she released all emails when she had not (and later admitted to) and of the deleted emails she said many went to her husband who publicly says he does not use email! http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/14/state-dept-cites-gaps-hillar y-clinton-email-record/?page=all https://youtu.be/T0Xtv1QMzy0 https://youtu.be/jzA-NEmAQaQ?t=8m40s * Her speeches: She refuses to release them. Why not? She gives the impression that either the speeches have info in them that she does not want out or that they are mundane enough to make it so the payments for them were payoffs. Either way she looks bad. She again refuses to be open. Oh, and she lies about them time and time again: https://www.facebook.com/itstheGADFLY/videos/1141125379240531/ * She argues against the fact that she is the establishment candidate. She is - if there was any question the super delegate (establishment) votes prove it. Instead of being honest and speaking about how this can be an advantage she lies and denies. Why not instead speak about how she and Sanders want many of there same things but as the establishment candidate she has more connections and more influence and will be able to get more done. She COULD be (mostly) honest and point out the benefits (showing the good side is what we all do in an interview... I get that). * She claims to not want to speak of the 1990s, whining often when Sanders brings the time up. She, however, repeatedly brings up the 1990s. This happens time and time again in the debates. More than that, when you run for president it is completely predictable that your past record will be asked about... to complain about people doing so is immature and silly. She at least comes across as having something to hide and deflecting. * She feels the need to repeatedly twist Sanders' record. The Washington Post goes into some detail here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/10/5-times-hillary-cl inton-has-played-fast-and-loose-with-the-facts-on-bernie-sanderss-record. She makes things up about or twists Sanders' record on immigration, the auto bailout, the Minutemen, the Koch brothers, his work with bank regulation, and more. At the very least this indicates she is afraid of his growing popularity and is playing dirty to try to win the candidacy. She shows she does not think she can stand on her own record. * Her answer about fracking was wordy and never really answered the question (a common theme with her, really). Mother Jones has an article about a likely reason why: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shal e-state-department-chevron If she thinks fracking should be used why does she not just say she is for it (and then can add that she wants to make sure it is well regulated). Why the deception and double talk from her? * Her comments on immigration were anything but clear, too. More on that from the New York Post: http://nypost.com/2016/03/11/immigration-experts-have-no-idea-what-hillary-i s-talking-about/ She repeatedly talks in circles and does not give clear answers. * Her comments about health care. When Sanders speaks of healthcare for all she says it would cost too much... but then in the next moment she says she wants to expand ObamaCare so that it covers healthcare for all (not just 90%). She cannot just give a clear answer. * Lying about not knowing where Sanders was as she pushed for better health care. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/272790-sanders-spokes person-fires-back-at-clinton-for-healthcare * On her own voting record she is just as unclear. The Onion had fun with this fact with this article: http://www.theonion.com/article/clinton-throws-flash-grenade-divert-attentio n-ques-52499 Clearly that is satire, but the point it makes is serious - she repeatedly gives non-answers to questions. * Repeatedly it seems like after breaks she has stronger answers to questions. I (and others) have hypothesized that she is getting assistance from her advisers. Now there seems to be direct evidence to back this up: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sanders-campaign-says-this-photo-proves-clinton-b roke-rules-during-univision-debate/ She at least seems to be unable to play by the rules. * She backs supporters of hers even when they act badly - in one example going so far as to play the sexist card claiming that there is a special place in hell for women who back Sanders. * Her husband at the very least skirts campaign laws by even hanging around polling places and blocking people in strong Sanders areas from voting: http://mediaite.com/a/vkkzf and http://www.snopes.com/clinton-campaign-laws-massachusetts/ * Her husband also sinks to saying Sanders' supporters, who back his fight for greater equality, are just as bad as Trump supporters who fight heavily against equality. * Lying about the Reagan's response to the HIV/AIDS crisis. I will grant and commend her for retracting this praise... and as such can see it as more of a mistake than a lie. I leave it on this list because I previously noted the inaccuracy of her claim. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/11/hillary-clin ton-apologizes-for-praising-nancy-reagans-response-to-hivaids/ * Lying about where her funding comes from and trying to sounds like she is similar to Sanders in this. http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-claim-small-donors-mostly-false-politifac t-finds * Her lie about avoiding a New York debate because of Sanders' tone when everyone know it is because she fears it will harm her chances of winning the state. In the past she has directly said "You should be willing to debate anytime, anywhere.": https://www.facebook.com/berniesanders/videos/1016591345062536/ * She lied when Sanders noted her money from the oil industry. Worse than that, she lost her temper over it... even though she used the SAME attack against Obama when she was running against him. http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/01/politics/hillary-clinton-oil-gas-donations-oba ma/ and her ad against Obama: https://youtu.be/3satJnoBXi8 She refuses to sign the agreement Sanders did to NOT take oil money, maybe because she has had massive amounts of oil money flow into the Clinton Foundation: http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/04/09/oil-money-flowed-clinton-turned- back-rights-abuses-colombia-report * Her fighting against Sanders for the $15 / hour minimum wage and then in New York working with the people fighting for it pretending she was backing it the whole time and is with them on their fight. http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-clinton-minimum-wage-20160404-s tory.html -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web