Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #95906
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs |
| Date | 2016-10-22 05:00 +0000 |
| Organization | Miskatonic U |
| Message-ID | <slrno0lsjb.1dca.g.kreme@snow.local> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <580a827b$0$41150$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <211020161710473803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <580a8c70$0$20175$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <nue5bi$61k$1@news.datemas.de> <580a9d78$0$29536$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com> |
In message <580a9d78$0$29536$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com> JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 2016-10-21 18:37, Alan Baker wrote: >> And does it change the facts and figures contained therein? > No, the "infomercial" facts are not challenged. However, someone who has > vested interests in selling PCs could discredit that "article" as a mere > infomercial and telling potential customers to ignore it. There he is, folks, The FUD monster has found an angle! A STUPID angle, to be sure, but an angle. -- "I don't care if Bill Gates is the world's biggest philanthropist. The pain he has inflicted on the world in the past 20 years through lousy products easily outweighs any good he has done.... Apple is as arrogant as Microsoft but at least its stuff works as advertised" - Graem Philipson
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-20 19:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 19:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 17:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-21 17:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 17:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-10-21 15:37 -0700
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 18:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-22 01:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-22 05:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-22 04:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-21 20:38 -0500
csiph-web