Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #95906

Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs

From Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs
Date 2016-10-22 05:00 +0000
Organization Miskatonic U
Message-ID <slrno0lsjb.1dca.g.kreme@snow.local> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <580a827b$0$41150$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <211020161710473803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <580a8c70$0$20175$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <nue5bi$61k$1@news.datemas.de> <580a9d78$0$29536$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In message <580a9d78$0$29536$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com> 
  JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 2016-10-21 18:37, Alan Baker wrote:

>> And does it change the facts and figures contained therein?

> No, the "infomercial" facts are not challenged. However, someone who has
> vested interests in selling PCs could discredit that "article" as a mere
> infomercial and telling potential customers to ignore it.

There he is, folks, The FUD monster has found an angle!

A STUPID angle, to be sure, but an angle.


-- 
"I don't care if Bill Gates is the world's biggest philanthropist. The
pain he has inflicted on the world in the past 20 years through lousy
products easily outweighs any good he has done.... Apple is as arrogant
as Microsoft but at least its stuff works as advertised" - Graem Philipson

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

[OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 16:42 +0000
  Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-20 19:07 +0000
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 19:19 +0000
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 17:02 -0400
      Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-21 17:10 -0400
        Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 17:45 -0400
          Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-10-21 15:37 -0700
            Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 18:57 -0400
              Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-22 01:43 +0000
              Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-22 05:00 +0000
      Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-22 04:58 +0000
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-21 20:38 -0500

csiph-web