Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs

From	Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs
Date	2016-10-22 01:43 +0000
Organization	People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Message-ID	<e6vuh4Fkri8U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <580a827b$0$41150$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <211020161710473803%nospam@nospam.invalid> <580a8c70$0$20175$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <nue5bi$61k$1@news.datemas.de> <580a9d78$0$29536$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-10-21, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 2016-10-21 18:37, Alan Baker wrote:
>
>> And does it change the facts and figures contained therein?
>
> No, the "infomercial" facts are not challenged. However, someone who
> has vested interests in selling PCs could discredit that "article" as
> a mere infomercial and telling potential customers to ignore it.
>
> That cost of opnwership fopr a Mac is lower is no news.

That doesn't change the fact that trolls and FUDsters constantly try to
claim Macs are overpriced garbage.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

[OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 16:42 +0000
  Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-20 19:07 +0000
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-20 19:19 +0000
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 17:02 -0400
      Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-21 17:10 -0400
        Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 17:45 -0400
          Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-10-21 15:37 -0700
            Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-21 18:57 -0400
              Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-22 01:43 +0000
              Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-22 05:00 +0000
      Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-22 04:58 +0000
    Re: [OT] Debate over: IBM confirms that Macs are less expensive than PCs "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-21 20:38 -0500

csiph-web