Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

Path	csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.alt.net
From	"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:31:56 +0100
Organization	~
Lines	31
Message-ID	<op.yy9vjisljs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References	<201703291311387217-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <D50FCB3B.9DF46%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyh888sujs98qf@red.lan> <D51175F1.9E406%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan> <D51557BF.9EED5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan> <140420171535216259%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yypci0d6js98qf@red.lan> <D516B5B0.9F114%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyut2kpvjs98qf@red.lan> <D51A6984.9FFA4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy9go3mkjs98qf@red.lan> <D524E34D.A1B1B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy9mdtgyjs98qf@red.lan> <D524F59E.A1B79%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy9qhlrgjs98qf@red.lan> <D5250545.A1BAB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy9srjzbjs98qf@red.lan> <D5250FB1.A1BCA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
User-Agent	Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:411486 sci.physics:630656 alt.privacy.anon-server:59184 comp.sys.mac.system:105512 alt.comp.os.windows-10:40859 alt.cellular-phone-tech:1561

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:37:37 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/25/17, 2:31 PM, in article op.yy9srjzbjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> It may well avert the next ice age.  Worst case scenario, different
>>>>>> countries have perfect growing climates, so different countries grow the
>>>>>> crops, no big deal.
>>>>>>
>>>>> While we can make things up like that I prefer to look to the science.
>>>>>
>>>> It doesn't matter what you believe or how much money governments waste on
>>>> it. The fact remains we will burn all the fossil fuels at some point, so if
>>>> you believe all this shit, you might as well go commit suicide.
>>>>
>>> Believe what... that we should not socialize the costs of carbon use?
>>>
>> That there's a problem using carbon at all.
>>
> So you use denial of the problem to push socializing of the costs.

I don't want to push any costs, as there are none.

> I disagree with doing so but realize I will not change your mind, nor will
> you change mine.

Agreed, it's like me trying to persuade a Muslim Allah doesn't exist.  I know he's an idiot, but he will always remain so.

-- 
Why does the law society prohibit sex between lawyers and their clients?
To prevent clients from being billed twice for essentially the same service.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 18:11 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 11:28 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 20:14 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 12:46 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 21:38 +0100
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 13:51 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 -0400
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 15:19 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 21:42 +0100
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 13:53 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 22:31 +0100
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 14:37 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 23:31 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 15:39 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-26 00:19 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 16:37 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-25 22:14 -0500
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 21:33 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-25 18:39 -0500
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 16:49 -0700

csiph-web