Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #408344
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51557BF.9EED5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <op.yyfw6sapjs98qf@red.lan> <D50FCB3B.9DF46%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyh888sujs98qf@red.lan> <D51175F1.9E406%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 4/13/17, 3:39 PM, in article op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: ... >>>>> Obama is a Muslim. >>>> >>>> Incorrect. >>> >>> He admitted it. >> >> He never said he was > > Yes he did. To be clear: this is a direct lie from you. It is not something you will ever support or back. The closest you will get is some video clip of a slip of the tongue which you will take out of context as you ignore the fact we know he is a Christian and there was even a huge controversy about the church he went to. >> but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"? > > The thing to admit is.... "I am a Muslim". The word "admit" has the connotation of noting you did something wrong. >>> And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him. >> >> Did he ever claim to be? > > Doesn't matter. The point is he isn't one, and yet he controlled a caucasian > country. He is half Caucasian and half black. That says nothing of his religion. Not a word. You confuse those things. And this is not a Caucasian country. >>> Why the fuck did you vote for him?! >> >> Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have >> been better. > > Why not vote in a white man? Why not vote for the best person for the job. But at this point it is clear you are just trolling for attention. >>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>> >>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>> their lives. >>>>>> >>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>> >>>>> So your president isn't actually in charge. Do you actually have a >>>>> government? >>>> >>>> We have checks and balances. >>> >>> It's a bloody mess. >> >> It is a system designed to make sure nothing ever happens well, and whatever >> does happen is done half-assed. >> >> What could go wrong? > > Everything. OK, on that I agree. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
csiph-web