Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #408419

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Organization	~
Message-ID	<op.yyo76pphjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <D50FCB3B.9DF46%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyh888sujs98qf@red.lan> <D51175F1.9E406%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan> <D51557BF.9EED5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:28:47 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/13/17, 3:39 PM, in article op.yynnvbrajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>>>>>> Obama is a Muslim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> He admitted it.
>>>
>>> He never said he was
>>
>> Yes he did.
>
> To be clear: this is a direct lie from you. It is not something you will
> ever support or back. The closest you will get is some video clip of a slip
> of the tongue which you will take out of context as you ignore the fact we
> know he is a Christian and there was even a huge controversy about the
> church he went to.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/17/goodbye-barack-hussein-obama-americas-first-muslim-president

>>> but if he was there would be nothing to "admit"?
>>
>> The thing to admit is.... "I am a Muslim".
>
> The word "admit" has the connotation of noting you did something wrong.

It is wrong to be a Muslim.

>>>> And he clearly ain't caucasian, just look at him.
>>>
>>> Did he ever claim to be?
>>
>> Doesn't matter.  The point is he isn't one, and yet he controlled a caucasian
>> country.
>
> He is half Caucasian and half black. That says nothing of his religion. Not
> a word. You confuse those things.
>
> And this is not a Caucasian country.

Some parts are very polluted, yes.  Hopefully we don't let the UK go that far.

>>>> Why the fuck did you vote for him?!
>>>
>>> Because he was the best choice and he did a passably good job. Could have
>>> been better.
>>
>> Why not vote in a white man?
>
> Why not vote for the best person for the job. But at this point it is clear
> you are just trolling for attention.

No, I'm asking you why you voted in a foreigner.  What next, a woman?

-- 
If an alien presented you with a piece of technology that could end all disease and famine throughout the entire planet, what would you do?
1) Present it to the President of the United States of America.
2) Sell it to the highest bidder.
3) Take it to pieces.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100

csiph-web