Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #81165

Re: Nikon D5 specifications?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: rec.photo.digital

Show key headers only | View raw

In article <2015092922175329945-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
 Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> On 2015-09-30 05:05:44 +0000, android <here@there.was> said:
> 
> > In article <2015092922020024515-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> >  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> >> On 2015-09-30 04:23:42 +0000, android <here@there.was> said:
> >>> In article <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> >>> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 2015-09-29 21:18:37 +0000, Davoud <star@sky.net> said:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> android:
> >>>>>> The people that are working towards print might find them selves with 
> >>>>>> an
> >>>>>> advantage against the competition with 24 rather than 16-20mpx...
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> If you mean those working in print publications, I guarantee you that
> >>>>> photo editors do not ask what the resolution of the camera was. I know
> >>>>> this from recent sales of macrophotos from my 6MP D100.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> remember that the higher screen resolution of today demands more and
> >>>>>> more from the files.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> And I know from viewing photos on my 27" iMac 5K Retina display that a
> >>>>> 6MP camera is up to the task of producing photos suitable for that
> >>>>> display.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I am still baffled that this thread continues in this NG when it is
> >>>> best suited for rec.photo.digital.
> >>> 
> >>> Davoud alerted me that I posted the article in the wrong group. I posted
> >>> it on my iTab in haste... I did try to move the stuff over to RPD but,
> >>> here we are! ;-)
> >> 
> >> I am sure that the simple task of adding a little modification to the
> >> headers in MT-NW would have solved the issue once you were alerted to
> >> it. Something such as this:
> >> "Followup-To:	rec.photo.digital"
> > 
> > That I did... ;-/
> 
> Not in this post you didn't. Let me help you, instead of the FollowUp 
> just add an X-Post, or change the destination if you decide to reply.

Well, I did move the topic to RPD... Floyd just answered to my original 
post. With respect to he seniority I decided to comment on that one 
here, so that he would find it! ;-)
> 
> > But we can talk here! :-))
> 
> Not on this subject, in this NG. Meet me over at RPD.

Oki... One more try then.
> 
> >> 
> >> Anyway, that is for you to decide, given that Floyd's feedback would
> >> have been better appreciated in RPD, and it never reached those folks.
> >> 
> >>>> Hell! Somehow android managed to get Floyd Davidson in on the
> >>>> discussion, even though he disavows all that Apple, MS, and Adobe have
> >>>> to offer. How he even found c.s.m.s. is a mystery.
> >>> 
> >>> I bet that he does various kinds of undercover stuff...
> >>>> 
> >>>> Unless he has become a closet OSX user. Hmm...
> >>> 
> >>> That's a theory!
-- 
teleportation kills

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-29 10:17 +0200
  Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-09-29 09:33 -0400
    Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-29 16:45 +0200
  Re: Nikon D5 specifications? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-09-29 08:46 -0800
    Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-29 20:27 +0200
      Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-09-29 17:18 -0400
        Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-29 14:31 -0700
          Re: Nikon D5 specifications? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-29 17:47 -0400
          Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-30 06:23 +0200
            Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-29 22:02 -0700
              Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-30 07:05 +0200
                Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-29 22:17 -0700
                Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-30 08:43 +0200
            Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-09-30 11:04 -0400

csiph-web