Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: android Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,rec.photo.digital Subject: Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Followup-To: rec.photo.digital Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:43:22 +0200 Organization: the center Lines: 71 Message-ID: References: <87vbatp409.fld@barrow.com> <290920151718375493%star@sky.net> <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015092922020024515-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2015092922175329945-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> X-Trace: individual.net PrK6Cs6RZfXL5kr3l4UnCAT71ugYbTStyc3JJB4HETgL2SUvgi X-Orig-Path: here Cancel-Lock: sha1:Jn/Oc76ysaSYPBwc82M4sAmkdAk= User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:81165 rec.photo.digital:174545 In article <2015092922175329945-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck wrote: > On 2015-09-30 05:05:44 +0000, android said: > > > In article <2015092922020024515-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, > > Savageduck wrote: > >> On 2015-09-30 04:23:42 +0000, android said: > >>> In article <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, > >>> Savageduck wrote: > >>>> On 2015-09-29 21:18:37 +0000, Davoud said: > >>>> > >>>>> android: > >>>>>> The people that are working towards print might find them selves with > >>>>>> an > >>>>>> advantage against the competition with 24 rather than 16-20mpx... > >>>>> > >>>>> If you mean those working in print publications, I guarantee you that > >>>>> photo editors do not ask what the resolution of the camera was. I know > >>>>> this from recent sales of macrophotos from my 6MP D100. > >>>>> > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> remember that the higher screen resolution of today demands more and > >>>>>> more from the files. > >>>>> > >>>>> And I know from viewing photos on my 27" iMac 5K Retina display that a > >>>>> 6MP camera is up to the task of producing photos suitable for that > >>>>> display. > >>>> > >>>> I am still baffled that this thread continues in this NG when it is > >>>> best suited for rec.photo.digital. > >>> > >>> Davoud alerted me that I posted the article in the wrong group. I posted > >>> it on my iTab in haste... I did try to move the stuff over to RPD but, > >>> here we are! ;-) > >> > >> I am sure that the simple task of adding a little modification to the > >> headers in MT-NW would have solved the issue once you were alerted to > >> it. Something such as this: > >> "Followup-To: rec.photo.digital" > > > > That I did... ;-/ > > Not in this post you didn't. Let me help you, instead of the FollowUp > just add an X-Post, or change the destination if you decide to reply. Well, I did move the topic to RPD... Floyd just answered to my original post. With respect to he seniority I decided to comment on that one here, so that he would find it! ;-) > > > But we can talk here! :-)) > > Not on this subject, in this NG. Meet me over at RPD. Oki... One more try then. > > >> > >> Anyway, that is for you to decide, given that Floyd's feedback would > >> have been better appreciated in RPD, and it never reached those folks. > >> > >>>> Hell! Somehow android managed to get Floyd Davidson in on the > >>>> discussion, even though he disavows all that Apple, MS, and Adobe have > >>>> to offer. How he even found c.s.m.s. is a mystery. > >>> > >>> I bet that he does various kinds of undercover stuff... > >>>> > >>>> Unless he has become a closet OSX user. Hmm... > >>> > >>> That's a theory! -- teleportation kills