Re: Nikon D5 specifications?

From	android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: Nikon D5 specifications?
Date	2015-09-30 07:05 +0200
Organization	the center
Message-ID	<d718t9Fmc14U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <d703hbFarbdU4@mid.individual.net> <290920151718375493%star@sky.net> <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <d716eeFmc14U1@mid.individual.net> <2015092922020024515-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <2015092922020024515-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
 Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> On 2015-09-30 04:23:42 +0000, android <here@there.was> said:
> 
> > In article <2015092914312820703-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> >  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 2015-09-29 21:18:37 +0000, Davoud <star@sky.net> said:
> >> 
> >>> android:
> >>>> The people that are working towards print might find them selves with an
> >>>> advantage against the competition with 24 rather than 16-20mpx...
> >>> 
> >>> If you mean those working in print publications, I guarantee you that
> >>> photo editors do not ask what the resolution of the camera was. I know
> >>> this from recent sales of macrophotos from my 6MP D100.
> >>> 
> >>>> and
> >>>> remember that the higher screen resolution of today demands more and
> >>>> more from the files.
> >>> 
> >>> And I know from viewing photos on my 27" iMac 5K Retina display that a
> >>> 6MP camera is up to the task of producing photos suitable for that
> >>> display.
> >> 
> >> I am still baffled that this thread continues in this NG when it is
> >> best suited for rec.photo.digital.
> > 
> > Davoud alerted me that I posted the article in the wrong group. I posted
> > it on my iTab in haste... I did try to move the stuff over to RPD but,
> > here we are! ;-)
> 
> I am sure that the simple task of adding a little modification to the 
> headers in MT-NW would have solved the issue once you were alerted to 
> it. Something such as this:
> "Followup-To:	rec.photo.digital"

That I did... ;-/ But we can talk here! :-))
> 
> Anyway, that is for you to decide, given that Floyd's feedback would 
> have been better appreciated in RPD, and it never reached those folks.
> 
> >> Hell! Somehow android managed to get Floyd Davidson in on the
> >> discussion, even though he disavows all that Apple, MS, and Adobe have
> >> to offer. How he even found c.s.m.s. is a mystery.
> > 
> > I bet that he does various kinds of undercover stuff...
> >> 
> >> Unless he has become a closet OSX user. Hmm...
> > 
> > That's a theory!
-- 
teleportation kills

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-29 10:17 +0200
  Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-09-29 09:33 -0400
    Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-29 16:45 +0200
  Re: Nikon D5 specifications? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-09-29 08:46 -0800
    Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-29 20:27 +0200
      Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-09-29 17:18 -0400
        Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-29 14:31 -0700
          Re: Nikon D5 specifications? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-29 17:47 -0400
          Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-30 06:23 +0200
            Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-29 22:02 -0700
              Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-30 07:05 +0200
                Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-09-29 22:17 -0700
                Re: Nikon D5 specifications? android <here@there.was> - 2015-09-30 08:43 +0200
            Re: Nikon D5 specifications? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-09-30 11:04 -0400

csiph-web