Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #78399
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: internal temps |
| Date | 2015-08-04 16:33 +0000 |
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Message-ID | <d2c7riFcr6gU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <3cd33ed1-8af7-4b07-8bd5-c6be3f9171f5@googlegroups.com> |
On 2015-08-04, Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote: > Is there a significant difference between the internal temps of entry > level iMacs and Powermacs? I was wondering that if there is a > significant temp difference then should that be a factor influencing > my next purchase because IMHO a higher internal temp would be > correlated with reliability? This is why I often ignore posts from Google Groups. "Frank" already asked this question on July 28, got three responses, and here is he asking the same question yet again. DUH! -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
internal temps Frank <gno52@windstream.net> - 2015-08-04 04:06 -0700
Re: internal temps Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2015-08-04 08:02 -0700
Re: internal temps Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-04 16:34 +0000
Re: internal temps Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-04 16:33 +0000
csiph-web