Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #78400
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: internal temps |
| Date | 2015-08-04 16:34 +0000 |
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Message-ID | <d2c7taFcr6gU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <3cd33ed1-8af7-4b07-8bd5-c6be3f9171f5@googlegroups.com> <vilain-B22443.08022104082015@news.individual.net> |
On 2015-08-04, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote: > In article <3cd33ed1-8af7-4b07-8bd5-c6be3f9171f5@googlegroups.com>, > Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote: > >> Is there a significant difference between the internal temps of entry level >> iMacs and Powermacs? I was wondering that if there is a significant temp >> difference then should that be a factor influencing my next purchase because >> IMHO a higher internal temp would be correlated with reliability? > > You're not comparing apples to apples. IMO, the iMac and laptop are two > different designs with different heat specs and dissipation. It's like > you're comparing horsepower and torque output of a Prius vs. a Tesla. > They're not the same. The guy may never see your reply. This isn't the first time he' asked this question. Consider the source (Google Groups). -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
internal temps Frank <gno52@windstream.net> - 2015-08-04 04:06 -0700
Re: internal temps Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2015-08-04 08:02 -0700
Re: internal temps Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-04 16:34 +0000
Re: internal temps Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-04 16:33 +0000
csiph-web