Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #78400

Re: internal temps

From Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: internal temps
Date 2015-08-04 16:34 +0000
Organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Message-ID <d2c7taFcr6gU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <3cd33ed1-8af7-4b07-8bd5-c6be3f9171f5@googlegroups.com> <vilain-B22443.08022104082015@news.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2015-08-04, Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> wrote:
> In article <3cd33ed1-8af7-4b07-8bd5-c6be3f9171f5@googlegroups.com>,
>  Frank <gno52@windstream.net> wrote:
>
>> Is there a significant difference between the internal temps of entry level 
>> iMacs and Powermacs?  I was wondering that if there is a significant temp 
>> difference then should that be a factor influencing my next purchase because 
>> IMHO a higher internal temp would be correlated with reliability?
>
> You're not comparing apples to apples. IMO, the iMac and laptop are two 
> different designs with different heat specs and dissipation.  It's like 
> you're comparing horsepower and torque output of a Prius vs. a Tesla.  
> They're not the same.

The guy may never see your reply. This isn't the first time he' asked
this question. 

Consider the source (Google Groups).

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

internal temps Frank <gno52@windstream.net> - 2015-08-04 04:06 -0700
  Re: internal temps Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2015-08-04 08:02 -0700
    Re: internal temps Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-04 16:34 +0000
  Re: internal temps Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-04 16:33 +0000

csiph-web