Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-05-07 12:55 -0700
Message-ID	<D534C9A7.A3EC8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(21 earlier) <oenkq5$v7g$1@dont-email.me> <vxJPA.16606$jO6.14157@fx41.iad> <oenqa7$j1v$1@dont-email.me> <D534BF93.A3E9D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oentn3$vhe$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/7/17, 12:48 PM, in article oentn3$vhe$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 07 May 2017 12:12:03 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 5/7/17, 11:50 AM, in article oenqa7$j1v$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> ... 
>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/03/01/anta
>>>>> rc
>>>>> tic-ice-has-set-an-unexpected-record-and-scientists-are-struggling-to-figu
>>>>> re
>>>>> -out-why/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> From the article:
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Indeed, the overall Antarctic sea ice trend, bucking climate change
>>>>> expectations, has been a slight increase over time, rather than a
>>>>> shrinkage."
>>>> 
>>>> Firstly, the NASA report referenced in the article states that
>>>> "Globally, sea ice is diminishing despite Antarctic gains".
>>>> https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/nasa-study-shows-global-sea-ice-dimini
>>>> sh
>>>> ing-despite-antarctic-gains
>>> 
>>> Oh, I missed out on this.
>>> I have been meaning to comment, and to do so as only a rude American can :)
>>> 
>>> Why the fuck is NASA being funded to do this crap?
>>> National Aeronautic and Space Administration.
>>> Either do space shit, or get defunded.
>>> Think *Mars*, not questionable ice measurements from space.
>>> 
>>> _-End Rant-_ for now.
>> 
>> They work with many areas of science, and to understand other planets they
>> also use the tools they develop on this one. Why would they not?
> 
> Haha.
> Yeah, the climate department getting pretty big.
> Funny that.
> News Flash!! ... global warming caused by satellites!!
> LOL.

What? Really the issue here is if we should socialize the costs of ancient
stores of carbon. I say NO... you say we should. But as with most pushing
that form of socialism you will use excuses instead of being direct.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 14:32 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:26 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 12:38 -0400
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:16 +0000
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Beezel Bub <nunya@bizz.invalid> - 2017-05-07 11:24 -0600
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:57 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:32 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:36 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:53 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 21:51 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 15:02 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:59 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:18 -0400
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:24 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 15:18 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:35 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 13:06 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:50 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:12 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:48 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:55 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:56 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:57 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-08 00:09 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:24 -0700

csiph-web