Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #106611

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/7/17, 4:09 PM, in article op.yzv49mcnjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 06 May 2017 17:26:48 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/6/17, 6:32 AM, in article op.yztjw4ubjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> So you really have nothing to say to support your comments about climate
>>>>>> change. OK.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, climate varies.
>>>> 
>>>> Again, not in contention.
>>> 
>>> If you agree it varies, you won't be worrying about us changing it then will
>>> you?
>> 
>> Another straw man from you.
> 
> Why do Americans love that silly phrase?

I see no reason to think Americans have a monopoly on noting logical
fallacies.

But the better question is why did you use a logical fallacy and why are you
trying to change the topic from that?

>> Keep in mind that, as far as you have shown, NONE of the scientific
>> disciplines that show evidence of man-made global climate change have ignored
>> the fact that the climate has changed in the past, nor have any of the major
>> models left that out.
> 
> Yes they do. 

So support this.

> They assume it wouldn't change by itself.

If you knew even the basics of the science you would know this is not true.
Here, with SECONDS of searching:

<https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/>
    -----
    The Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last
    650,000 years there have been seven cycles of glacial advance and
    retreat, with the abrupt end of the last ice age about 7,000 years
    ago marking the beginning of the modern climate era ‹ and of human
    civilization. Most of these climate changes are attributed to very
    small variations in Earth¹s orbit that change the amount of solar
    energy our planet receives.
    -----
    
Absolutely trivial to show you are wrong on that.

> If they did, they wouldn't care what we were doing.

That is an absurd conclusion. It is like saying we know we will all die some
day so murder does not matter... it is just leading to death which is
natural. Utter nonsense.

> The natural turn of events caused by that big nuclear reaction in the sky is
> far more powerful than what we can do.

Again, you assume this is in contention. You go out of your way to show your
ignorance of the science. Why?

> But just you carry on believing in climate change bullshit and god and tooth
> fairies and whatever else you dumb shit yanks think about.

You just went out of your way to note your denial of the science (and
support for massive socialism for the rich) is based on your ignorance of
the science... then you want me to accept your views.

That is silly of you.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 14:32 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:26 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 12:38 -0400
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:16 +0000
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Beezel Bub <nunya@bizz.invalid> - 2017-05-07 11:24 -0600
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:57 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:32 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:36 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:53 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 21:51 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 15:02 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:59 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:18 -0400
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:24 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 15:18 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:35 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 13:06 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:50 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:12 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:48 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:55 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:56 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:57 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-08 00:09 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:24 -0700

csiph-web