Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-05-06 15:48 -0700
Message-ID	<D533A0D6.A3D4F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(21 earlier) <oel8l7$dqk$1@dont-email.me> <D5337E09.A3D0C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oelbl0$op0$1@dont-email.me> <D53382C7.A3D20%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oelida$g7m$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/6/17, 3:23 PM, in article oelida$g7m$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sat, 06 May 2017 13:40:23 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 5/6/17, 1:28 PM, in article oelbl0$op0$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 06 May 2017 13:20:09 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>> On 5/6/17, 12:37 PM, in article oel8l7$dqk$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ... 
>>>>>>>> I understand the barycenter.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Got a picture of it?
>>>>>>> An actual picture, not a diagram.
>>>>>>> If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The fact you want a picture of the center of gravity of a set of objects
>>>>>> shows you have NO clue what we are even talking about. Seriously, wow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I knew you didn't have one, dummy.
>>>>> So, it's still the Sun.
>>>> 
>>>> Ah, name calling as you ask for an actual picture (not a diagram) of the
>>>> center of gravity (the barycenter). That is like asking for an actual
>>>> picture (not a diagram) of an orbit.
>>> 
>>> Yep.
>> 
>> In other words your request shows ignorance of the topic.
> 
> So, with this new found expertise, you'll be moving out of the chicken coupe?
>  :)

Don't get the reference but I don't keep up with modern pop references. Did
a quick search now and did not find it. I assume you likely meant coop and
not coupe, but maybe not?

>>>> It is a nonsense request that just shows ignorance. The closest you can
>>>> come is to show a time lapse or an image that depicts such. I *did* show
>>>> you a diagram of that and it did not help you.
>>> 
>>> It did not persuade me.
>>> Planets orbit the Sun :)
>> 
>> From a first or second grade level of understanding, sure. But we have
>> covered this.
> 
> I doubt second graders know what an orbit is.

They should. I know my kids did at that age.

>> When Saturn and Jupiter are on the same side of the sun it is not even in
>> the area of the sun.
> 
> Wrong.

<https://youtu.be/1iSR3Yw6FXo?t=1m55s>

>>>> At that point it comes to you taking responsibility for understanding the
>>>> concept. And it is not that hard of one... already showed you this NASA
>>>> article which seems directed at grade school kids (and goes over your
>>>> head):
>>>> 
>>>>     <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>
>>> 
>>> Yeah, I've seen it.
>> 
>> But shown no understanding. Sure.
> 
> Things have been a mess since Pluto left.

It never left.

... 
>>> Yeah, it's run it's course.
>> 
>> Can you post an actual picture (not a diagram) of this course?
> 
> https://giphy.com/gifs/arguing-A6eeii8JprHKo

:)


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:33 -0700
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:46 +0000
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:52 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 01:02 +0000
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 18:23 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 01:47 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 19:18 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 08:53 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:53 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:30 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 10:44 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:54 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 12:05 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 19:37 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-06 22:09 +0200
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Charlie <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> - 2017-05-06 16:19 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:55 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:22 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:20 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 20:28 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:40 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 22:23 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 15:48 -0700

csiph-web