Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #413377

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/6/17, 12:37 PM, in article oel8l7$dqk$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

... 
>>>> I understand the barycenter.
>>> 
>>> Got a picture of it?
>>> An actual picture, not a diagram.
>>> If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :)
>> 
>> The fact you want a picture of the center of gravity of a set of objects
>> shows you have NO clue what we are even talking about. Seriously, wow.
> 
> I knew you didn't have one, dummy.
> So, it's still the Sun.

Ah, name calling as you ask for an actual picture (not a diagram) of the
center of gravity (the barycenter). That is like asking for an actual
picture (not a diagram) of an orbit.

It is a nonsense request that just shows ignorance. The closest you can come
is to show a time lapse or an image that depicts such. I *did* show you a
diagram of that and it did not help you.

At that point it comes to you taking responsibility for understanding the
concept. And it is not that hard of one... already showed you this NASA
article which seems directed at grade school kids (and goes over your head):

    <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>

Then there is this:

    <https://youtu.be/1iSR3Yw6FXo>

That goes into more detail. Turns out the next time the center of the sun
will be almost exactly at the center of the solar system will be in 2169. In
any case, the way Saturn and Jupiter line up may be tied to the 11 year
cycle of sun spots, something I had not considered or heard about... so
thank you for the discussion.

And with this I am not sure what else to add. I can repost the same links
and explanations but I suspect you will remain ignorant and unable to
understand. 

...


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 08:53 +0000
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:53 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:30 +0000
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 10:44 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:54 +0000
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 12:05 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 19:37 +0000
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-06 22:09 +0200
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Charlie <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> - 2017-05-06 16:19 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:55 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:22 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:20 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 20:28 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:40 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 22:23 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 15:48 -0700

csiph-web