Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #104491
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D518544A.9F407%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (20 earlier) <oculcm$i2p$1@dont-email.me> <D5182BD7.9F3DF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ocupm7$nef$1@dont-email.me> <D5183BCD.9F3F5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ocurgb$tkp$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 4/15/17, 9:21 PM, in article ocurgb$tkp$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 21:06:21 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/15/17, 8:50 PM, in article ocupm7$nef$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:58:15 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/15/17, 7:37 PM, in article oculcm$i2p$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:38:48 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/15/17, 7:12 PM, in article ocujtn$ht4$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:09:20 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 6:53 PM, in article ocuiqk$ht4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK, now we know you will NEVER show understanding of the point: the >>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>> kids Trump says he wants to protect are the ones he refuses to >>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>> he >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> afraid of those children. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Basic concepts go far, far over your hard. Fair enough. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You went FAR out of your way to make it clear you cannot understand >>>>>>>> simple >>>>>>>> concepts. No back pedaling now! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "What about the children?" is old lame. >>>>>>> You drag that around like a pet rock. >>>>>> >>>>>> See: you keep going on and on and on about how you have no clue what my >>>>>> point even is. You just CANNOT get it. Fine. Point made -- you are >>>>>> clueless. >>>>> >>>>> "What about the children?" is old lame. >>>>> You drag that around like a pet rock. >>>> >>>> You are the one bringing it up time and time again. I said NOTHING of it. >>>> Not a word. >>> >>> gibberish >> >> Given your demonstrated lack of comprehension, sure, almost everything is >> gibberish to you. >> No argument here. > > Ha! > >>>> I did note how Trump uses it inconsistently and to promote war and not >>>> humanitarian efforts, but as you keep noting that point has gone completely >>>> over your head. >> >> And below you AGAIN show you have no ability to comprehend what you read. >> >> Why do you keep posting when your only points are you cannot understand what >> you read and you want special entitlements? > > Oh, I forgot to add to below: > When you're running around, giving advice Only advice I have here is for you to work to understand what you read. Good luck! > and humanitarian aid and pork > chops, beware of crowded areas and buses. > > Seems people over there can either explode at will, or when getting close > to crowds and buses. > > Perhaps you can find out what's the deal with that. > Maybe they'll teach you how to do it. :) > >>> >>> Then leave the roost, pack your bags, and head on over there to implement >>> your stategy for solving Muslim mayhem. >>> Have the kevlar necktie on as soon as you get there. >>> >>> Give Trump a call, tell him you're there, so he won't worry. >>> >>> Then, find the guy with the biggest turban, longest beard, and let him know >>> that you can build chicken coupes, and you are *The Expert* on humanitarian >>> causes. >>> >>> You will hear a clang. >>> That's the necktie doing it job, but it won't stand up against too many >>> blows, so you'll want to put those running shoes into high gear. >>> >>> Grab the bowling ball bag, and place it on your head. >>> It's the only way to be sure it will end up there. >>> >>> Run like hell, hide whenever you can, reach a village, town, camel rest >>> stop, then give them the humanitarian advice they sorely need. >>> >>> When you've fixed everything, post back. >>> Let us know what thousands of experts have been unable to do. >>> >>>>>> And before you say I am calling you names or spewing insults remember I >>>>>> posted the point time and time again until you whined... and you still >>>>>> have >>>>>> NO clue what I am even talking about. You have not asked any questions to >>>>>> help you to understand. You have merely shown off your ignorance. >>>>> >>>>> "What about the children?" is old lame. >>>>> You drag that around like a pet rock. >>>> >>>> Again: you are the one bringing it up. >>> >>> Call the taxi, already. >>> >>>>>> Fine. You are ignorant. I get it. Why do you keep belaboring the point? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "What about the children?" is old lame. >>>>> You drag that around like a pet rock. >>>> >>>> And again. >>> >>> ad nauseum -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 18:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 11:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
csiph-web