Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Message-ID	<D5183BCD.9F3F5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(21 earlier) <ocujtn$ht4$2@dont-email.me> <D5182748.9F3D5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <oculcm$i2p$1@dont-email.me> <D5182BD7.9F3DF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ocupm7$nef$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/15/17, 8:50 PM, in article ocupm7$nef$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:58:15 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 4/15/17, 7:37 PM, in article oculcm$i2p$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:38:48 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>> On 4/15/17, 7:12 PM, in article ocujtn$ht4$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:09:20 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>>>> On 4/15/17, 6:53 PM, in article ocuiqk$ht4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> OK, now we know you will NEVER show understanding of the point: the
>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>> kids Trump says he wants to protect are the ones he refuses to because
>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> afraid of those children.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Basic concepts go far, far over your hard. Fair enough.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You went FAR out of your way to make it clear you cannot understand
>>>>>> simple
>>>>>> concepts. No back pedaling now!
>>>>> 
>>>>> "What about the children?" is old lame.
>>>>> You drag that around like a pet rock.
>>>> 
>>>> See: you keep going on and on and on about how you have no clue what my
>>>> point even is. You just CANNOT get it. Fine. Point made -- you are
>>>> clueless.
>>> 
>>> "What about the children?" is old lame.
>>> You drag that around like a pet rock.
>> 
>> You are the one bringing it up time and time again. I said NOTHING of it.
>> Not a word.
> 
> gibberish

Given your demonstrated lack of comprehension, sure, almost everything is
gibberish to you. No argument here.

>> I did note how Trump uses it inconsistently and to promote war and not
>> humanitarian efforts, but as you keep noting that point has gone completely
>> over your head.

And below you AGAIN show you have no ability to comprehend what you read.

Why do you keep posting when your only points are you cannot understand what
you read and you want special entitlements?
> 
> Then leave the roost, pack your bags, and head on over there to implement
> your stategy for solving Muslim mayhem.
> Have the kevlar necktie on as soon as you get there.
> 
> Give Trump a call, tell him you're there, so he won't worry.
> 
> Then, find the guy with the biggest turban, longest beard, and let him know
> that you can build chicken coupes, and you are *The Expert* on humanitarian
> causes.
> 
> You will hear a clang.
> That's the necktie doing it job, but it won't stand up against too many
> blows, so you'll want to put those running shoes into high gear.
> 
> Grab the bowling ball bag, and place it on your head.
> It's the only way to be sure it will end up there.
> 
> Run like hell, hide whenever you can, reach a village, town, camel rest
> stop, then give them the humanitarian advice they sorely need.
> 
> When you've fixed everything, post back.
> Let us know what thousands of experts have been unable to do.
> 
>>>> And before you say I am calling you names or spewing insults remember I
>>>> posted the point time and time again until you whined... and you still have
>>>> NO clue what I am even talking about. You have not asked any questions to
>>>> help you to understand. You have merely shown off your ignorance.
>>> 
>>> "What about the children?" is old lame.
>>> You drag that around like a pet rock.
>> 
>> Again: you are the one bringing it up.
> 
> Call the taxi, already.
> 
>>>> Fine. You are ignorant. I get it. Why do you keep belaboring the point?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> "What about the children?" is old lame.
>>> You drag that around like a pet rock.
>> 
>> And again.
> 
> ad nauseum


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 18:43 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 11:00 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700

csiph-web