Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #37955 > unrolled thread

Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime

Started byRonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron)
First post2017-04-02 15:04 -0700
Last post2017-04-05 08:29 -0400
Articles 14 on this page of 74 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps


Contents

  Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) - 2017-04-02 15:04 -0700
    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-02 18:13 -0400
      Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) - 2017-04-03 19:56 -0700
        Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-03 23:01 -0400
          Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-04 03:43 +0000
        Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2017-04-04 00:23 -0400
          Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-04 15:44 +1100
            Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 16:25 -0500
              Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-04 17:26 -0400
                Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-04 23:46 +0000
                  Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 17:25 -0700
                    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 17:28 -0700
                    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-05 00:52 +0000
                      Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-05 13:35 -0400
                        Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 14:49 +0000
                          Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 11:12 -0400
                            Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 15:28 +0000
                              Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 11:43 -0400
                                Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 16:13 +0000
                                  Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 12:48 -0400
                                    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 19:11 +0000
                                Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-07 09:51 +1100
              Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-05 10:53 +1100
                Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 18:55 -0700
                  Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-05 12:59 +1100
                    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 20:28 -0700
                      Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-06 07:00 +1100
                        Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-05 14:22 -0700
                          Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-06 09:37 +1100
                            Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-06 11:36 +0100
          Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2017-04-04 13:07 +0100
            Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-04 11:03 -0400
            Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 16:39 -0500
            Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-04 18:05 -0400
          Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-04 15:20 +0000
        Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-04 17:56 -0400
    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2017-04-02 20:53 -0400
    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-03 02:34 +0000
    Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-03 17:47 -0400
      Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-03 18:05 -0400
        Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 18:32 +0100
          Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-04 15:13 -0300
            Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 19:30 +0100
            Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 19:54 +0100
              Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:11 -0400
                Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 20:33 +0100
                  Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:51 -0400
                  Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-04 18:53 -0300
                    Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-05 10:30 +0100
                      Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-05 08:40 -0300
          Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-04 15:49 -0400
          Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-04 17:41 -0400
            Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-05 10:10 +0100
              Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 07:00 -0400
              Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 07:05 -0400
                Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-05 12:15 +0100
                  Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-05 09:06 -0300
                    Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 16:14 -0400
                    Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-19 15:54 +0100
                      Re: [OT]David Brooks - CYBERCRIMINAL Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-19 12:30 -0300
                        Re: [OT]David Brooks - CYBERCRIMINAL Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-19 14:35 -0300
                      Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-05-19 18:56 -0400
                        Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-20 08:08 +0100
                          Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-20 08:13 +0100
                        Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-05-20 14:00 +0000
                          Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-20 12:43 -0300
                            Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-20 17:29 +0100
                              Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-20 22:00 -0300
                              Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-05-21 08:34 -0400
                              Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-05-21 13:04 +0000
                          Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Mike_Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2017-05-20 18:21 -0400
                            Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-05-21 13:04 +0000
                              Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-05-21 11:51 -0400
                  Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 08:29 -0400

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]


#38186 — Re: [OT]David Brooks - CYBERCRIMINAL

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2017-05-19 14:35 -0300
SubjectRe: [OT]David Brooks - CYBERCRIMINAL
Message-ID<vhauhctfnmlft7sqfi0tmjtupdj7jkr2ah@4ax.com>
In reply to#38185
On Fri, 19 May 2017 12:30:20 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 May 2017 15:54:03 +0100, "David B."
><DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 4/5/2017 1:06 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B."
>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:-
>>>>> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you.
>>> 
>>>> We're not discussing 'nyms'
>>> 
>>> 	Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've
>>> been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are aware you
>>> were BANNED.
>>> 	Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific.
>>> 	[]'s
>>> 
>>
>>Do you consider <STALKING_REMOVED> to be a PRIVATE server?
>
>	Any server you do not OWN is PRIVATE. It belongs to someone
>else. It can have public access, but you must abide by their rules.
>
>	So of course you are a CRIMINAL for hacking it (if that's what
>you are asking). You broke the law.
>	Drinking more recently ? What a stuuuupid question, even for
>you.
>	[]'s
>
>	PS Why did you cross-post this to a Mac group ? STALKING there
>too ? I also fixed the subject line, It contained a  third party's
>name, totally unrelated to your post, a big no-no on Usenet.
>	Say TY

	Hey 'badguy hunter". Maybe you help. I typed BoaterDave into
Google, and it asked me to solve this "related" captcha:

http://www.majorgeeks.com/news/file/9832_captcha.gif

	TIA
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38187 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromPhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net>
Date2017-05-19 18:56 -0400
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<ofnt70$ht3$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#38184
David B. wrote:
> On 4/5/2017 1:06 PM, Shadow wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B."
>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:-
>>>> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you.
>>
>>> We're not discussing 'nyms'
>>
>>     Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've
>> been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are aware you
>> were BANNED.
>>     Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific.
>>     []'s
>>
>
> Do you consider www.answers.microsoft.com to be a PRIVATE server?
>
Not hardly. It a Forum to give and receive replies to Microsoft products 
such as office for Mac (Word PowerPoint, Excel One Note (don't use Outlook)

-- 
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.      "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net    mailto:pjonescet@comcast.net
http://phillipjones-cet.net/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38188 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2017-05-20 08:08 +0100
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<ofoprh$b2a$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#38187
On 5/19/2017 11:56 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
> David B. asked

>> Do you consider www.answers.microsoft.com to be a PRIVATE server?
>>
> Not hardly. It a Forum to give and receive replies to Microsoft products 
> such as office for Mac (Word PowerPoint, Excel One Note (don't use Outlook)

Extract from a LinkedIn discussion:-

Prof John Walker FRSA Purveyor Dark Intelligence
So true - but it is the missing component - one only has to look at 
*falsified Linkedin profiles* of people who, say claim 30 years in the 
industry, and who have served in the RAF - taken in sadly but the people 
who run Infosec UK, and other global security organisations - who do not 
seem to care - so yes you are spot on.

David B asked ....

What percentage of LinkedIn profiles do you suspect are falsified?

This is ONE I believe to be false:- https://www.linkedin.com/in/pauladare/

Have you any way of checking?


Justin White asked ....
David B.  Why do you believe that one to be false? After ten seconds of 
investigating I found this. 
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/profile/paul%20adare?type=forum&type=forum


David B. said ....

Can you ask why he participated in this thread?

https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/WindowsDefenderATPPreview/thread/6a77429e-9a0c-4f41-a4a4-cb861b717224/#dfca1cd2-273f-43ef-969b-62b64139f616


On his Twitter page (@TheOtherPKIGuy) Paul claims that he is 
self-employed. On his  LinkedIn page, it says he runs a company
"Owner - Company Name: FYI TechKnowlogy Services" - I believe that to be 
fictitious.

In the now deleted thread shown above, it was claimed that Paul Adare is 
actually employed by Microsoft.

ALL the claims cannot be right!  You should investigate www.IdentIt.ca - 
if you use waybackmachine you'll discover that Mr Adare was one of the 
two guys who set up the company. After the fiasco at the link above, the 
web site has been taken down (or has it?!!!)

David B asked ....

     Hello Justin - did you ask Mr Adare?  Does he actually work for 
Microsoft or for the company cited on his LinkedIn page?

Please read here:- 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wjn1qy8d9om8qy6/Reply%20to%20Rob%20in%20Microsoft%20Answers%20%28JPG%29%202.jpg?dl=0

==

Do YOU know the truth Phillip?!!!

-- 
David B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38189 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2017-05-20 08:13 +0100
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<ofoq3t$b2a$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#38188
On 5/20/2017 8:08 AM, David B. added...

> On his Twitter page (@TheOtherPKIGuy) Paul claims that he is 
> self-employed. On his  LinkedIn page, it says he runs a company
> "Owner - Company Name: FYI TechKnowlogy Services" - I believe that to be 
> fictitious.

Here's the link!

https://twitter.com/TheOtherPKIGuy

HTH

-- 
David B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38190 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2017-05-20 14:00 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<XnsA77B676501A7AHT1@1klo30J1Jtp.MlnY8MRAj54kBh2.93>
In reply to#38187
PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net>
news:ofnt70$ht3$1@news.albasani.net Fri, 19 May 2017 22:56:32 GMT in
alt.2600, wrote: 

> David B. wrote:
>> On 4/5/2017 1:06 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B."
>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:-
>>>>> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you.
>>>
>>>> We're not discussing 'nyms'
>>>
>>>     Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've
>>> been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are
>>> aware you were BANNED.
>>>     Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific.
>>>     []'s
>>>
>>
>> Do you consider www.answers.microsoft.com to be a PRIVATE server?
>>
> Not hardly. It a Forum to give and receive replies to Microsoft
> products such as office for Mac (Word PowerPoint, Excel One Note
> (don't use Outlook) 
> 

Since you left your email addy in your signature block, and, David 
Brooks has been able to initiate contact with you via usenet, expect 
one or more emails by him asking how to do this or that. Leading 
upto, how to get his 'revenge' on me for well, a war he started with 
me that he had no hope in winning.

As that's his M.O. You've essentially responded to a stalker in a 
friendly fashion, so, if he hasn't already reached out to you, he 
will soon enough. 

Case in point:
MID: <C87RA.739350$Mr1.566802@fx27.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100

Good luck!


-- 
I would like to apologize for not having offended you yet. 
Please be patient. I will get to you shortly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38191 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2017-05-20 12:43 -0300
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<8jo0iclsd8oer6bca0mf7upqtrvdbk0ie4@4ax.com>
In reply to#38190
On Sat, 20 May 2017 14:00:12 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net>
wrote:

>PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net>
>news:ofnt70$ht3$1@news.albasani.net Fri, 19 May 2017 22:56:32 GMT in
>alt.2600, wrote: 
>
>> David B. wrote:
>>> On 4/5/2017 1:06 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B."
>>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:-
>>>>>> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you.
>>>>
>>>>> We're not discussing 'nyms'
>>>>
>>>>     Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've
>>>> been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are
>>>> aware you were BANNED.
>>>>     Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific.
>>>>     []'s
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you consider <A_PRIVATELY_OWNED_SERVER> to be a PRIVATE server?
>>>
>> Not hardly. It a Forum to give and receive replies
>> 
>
>Since you left your email addy in your signature block, and, David 
>Brooks has been able to initiate contact with you via usenet, expect 
>one or more emails by him asking how to do this or that. Leading 
>upto, how to get his 'revenge' on me for well, a war he started with 
>me that he had no hope in winning.
>
>As that's his M.O. You've essentially responded to a stalker in a 
>friendly fashion, so, if he hasn't already reached out to you, he 
>will soon enough. 
>
>Case in point:
>MID: <C87RA.739350$Mr1.566802@fx27.fr7>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100
>
>Good luck!

	If the guy BD is stalking gets arrested for helping him hack,
he can't say we didn't warn him.
	Though just the fact that he said a PRIVATE server was
"public" shows that he's either brain dead, yet another one of BD's
many socks or one of BD's fsck buddies..
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38192 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

From"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2017-05-20 17:29 +0100
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<ofpqmu$jmk$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#38191
On 5/20/2017 4:43 PM, Shadow wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2017 14:00:12 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net>
>> news:ofnt70$ht3$1@news.albasani.net Fri, 19 May 2017 22:56:32 GMT in
>> alt.2600, wrote:
>>
>>> David B. wrote:
>>>> On 4/5/2017 1:06 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B."
>>>>> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:-
>>>>>>> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you.
>>>>>
>>>>>> We're not discussing 'nyms'
>>>>>
>>>>>      Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've
>>>>> been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are
>>>>> aware you were BANNED.
>>>>>      Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific.
>>>>>      []'s
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you consider <A_PRIVATELY_OWNED_SERVER> to be a PRIVATE server?
>>>>
>>> Not hardly. It a Forum to give and receive replies
>>>
>>
>> Since you left your email addy in your signature block, and, David
>> Brooks has been able to initiate contact with you via usenet, expect
>> one or more emails by him asking how to do this or that. Leading
>> upto, how to get his 'revenge' on me for well, a war he started with
>> me that he had no hope in winning.
>>
>> As that's his M.O. You've essentially responded to a stalker in a
>> friendly fashion, so, if he hasn't already reached out to you, he
>> will soon enough.
>>
>> Case in point:
>> MID: <C87RA.739350$Mr1.566802@fx27.fr7>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100
>>
>> Good luck!
> 
> 	If the guy BD is stalking gets arrested for helping him hack,
> he can't say we didn't warn him.
> 	Though just the fact that he said a PRIVATE server was
> "public" shows that he's either brain dead, yet another one of BD's
> many socks or one of BD's fsck buddies..
> 	[]'s


Unlike *YOU*, Phillip is another one of life's 'good guys'! :-)

He is also a REAL Professional!  http://www.phillipmjones.net/

-- 
David B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38194 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2017-05-20 22:00 -0300
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<hjp1icphha5011jumudd1pjf1r9d7vgss5@4ax.com>
In reply to#38192
On Sat, 20 May 2017 17:29:31 +0100, "David B."
<DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

><MY_TARGET>
> is also a REAL Professional!  <CUT_PERSONAL_LINK>

	Well, he's been warned.
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38195 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromburfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk>
Date2017-05-21 08:34 -0400
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<ofs19p$lfr$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#38192
On Sat, 20 May 2017 17:29:31 +0100
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

> He is also a REAL Professional!  http://www.phillipmjones.xxx

Unlike MVPs with web sites that are not?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38196 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2017-05-21 13:04 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<XnsA77C5E0745895HT1@ax0qmE9QsA.g01tO.6>
In reply to#38192
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org>
news:ofpqmu$jmk$1@dont-email.me Sat, 20 May 2017 16:29:31 GMT in
alt.2600, wrote: 

> Unlike *YOU*, Phillip is another one of life's 'good guys'! :-)

You aren't, though.

I found your youtube channel with a further degraded copy of my video 
that you copied from my personal website and altered without my 
permission. You made it very easy when you posted a link in this 
newsgroup. You did advise that one should read a comment you left; so I 
did. And, when I clicked your name, there was your channel on youtube. 

When you send a video to youtube, they recompress it for you; reducing 
the video quality that much more. Since you already lost the audio 
track and damaged the original video quality with your MAC, you didn't 
leave youtube much to work with. The youtube version is more pixelated 
than your copy, now. Good job, stalker!

I left you a comment on it, too. You're welcome to read it. It's the 
first comment I've ever left on youtube, actually. I can only wonder 
what reason you had for attempting to edit the video, though...Would 
you like to share your reason with me? 

While you're at it, would you like to share your reason for having 
tried to recruit me to hack web forums for you in the first place, 
David? You aren't the nice guy you want others to think of you as. You 
abuse people and their things. And you solicit the help of others to 
assist you in doing it, and, when they won't (like myself) you attack 
them, and stalk them. Nobody need take my word for it, your own words 
confirm it, Right here:

http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bdemail1.zip

A complete, unedited copy of our entire email correspondence before you 
decided to stalk me and try to place my family in harms way, because I 
refused to do malicious things to others for your benefit.

Why would I give you access to the original video file when you've 
abused the low grade copy you already have in such a manner, David? 
It's obvious you aren't trustworthy. So, what possible benefit would it 
provide me to explain how to unlock and unzip the original file for 
you? 

Anyone who hasn't already read the email archive should do so, to 
familiarize themselves with how you really are. You can't hide what a 
serious stalking, pile of shit you are. 

The reason we (You and I) have a problem is directly because I 
wouldn't do you a couple of favors which would have resulted in you 
being able to stalk more people you have some issue with. That's 
covered in the email archive freely available via the link above, 
too. I'll gladly take whatever abuse you think you can send my way for 
my refusal to help you cause strife for others who might not otherwise 
be able to hold their own. I'll happily be the firewall on this one.


-- 
I would like to apologize for not having offended you yet. 
Please be patient. I will get to you shortly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38193 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromMike_Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net>
Date2017-05-20 18:21 -0400
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<xnmx5i45luvx$.1l9ed9uwrzthe$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#38190
On Sat, 20 May 2017 14:00:12 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote:

> Since you left your email addy in your signature block, and, David 
> Brooks has been able to initiate contact with you via usenet, expect 
> one or more emails by him 

With something like: "I should be most grateful if you would, in some way,
acknowledge receipt of this message" so that he can get your IP# to
facilitate his staulking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38197 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromDiesel <me@privacy.net>
Date2017-05-21 13:04 +0000
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<XnsA77C5E0797188HT1@ax0qmE9QsA.g01tO.6>
In reply to#38193
Mike_Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net>
news:xnmx5i45luvx$.1l9ed9uwrzthe$.dlg@40tude.net Sat, 20 May 2017
22:21:27 GMT in alt.2600, wrote: 

> On Sat, 20 May 2017 14:00:12 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote:
> 
>> Since you left your email addy in your signature block, and,
>> David Brooks has been able to initiate contact with you via
>> usenet, expect one or more emails by him 
> 
> With something like: "I should be most grateful if you would, in
> some way, acknowledge receipt of this message" so that he can get
> your IP# to facilitate his staulking.
> 

Heh, it's better than that. Here's what BD does to people that won't
help him stalk/hack other systems on his behalf and turn over their
user databases. He'll download what isn't his to keep a copy of,
modify it, and upload it to youtube. He somehow thinks this works as
a method of intimidation. The excessive alcohol consumption must
have done a number on his brain cells. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkcrTBG_M-Y

All because of this email correspondence between the two of us, where 
you can clearly read for yourself, I wouldn't help him stalk or hack 
others he wanted more information on. I was more than willing to 
assist him in any malware issues he felt he had, or that he felt any 
site had, but, not one single time would he/could he provide me a url 
to examine for evidence of malware, or, collect a sample of such.

http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bdemail1.zip

Anyone who hasn't already read the email archive should do so, to 
familiarize themselves with what he really is. And anyone who doesn't 
approve of his activities and would like to speak to him about it, 
over the phone, via email, and/or in person, can easily do so by 
viewing this picture:

http://picpaste.com/01bBZABL.jpg

Of course, visiting in person must wait until he returns from his 
drunken binges and boating trips. He delayed contact with police 
officers that wanted to interview him about an online threat with a 
9mm pistol he claimed to have a legal right to have in his possession 
against another posters kids. So, don't expect the coward to be home 
during the summer time. Probably better to call ahead and/or email.

And if you do either, be sure you use a burner phone and/or 
disposable email address, or, you'll be his next stalking victim.

It's also worth noting that the police officers who investigated the 
complaint determined he had no such permits/permission of any sort to 
have any firearm and he denied having one when they did finally catch 
upto him. 

So, he either lied to the other poster about the handgun, or, he lied 
to the cops about having it. If he does have one, he doesn't have it 
legally in his country, despite his claims to the contrary. So either 
way you slice it, the result is the same. He's a liar and every bit 
the piece of shit I've *always* warned others he was. 


-- 
I would like to apologize for not having offended you yet. 
Please be patient. I will get to you shortly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38198 — Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromburfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk>
Date2017-05-21 11:51 -0400
SubjectRe: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<ofscre$jcp$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#38197
On Sun, 21 May 2017 13:04:20 -0000 (UTC)
Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote:

> Mike_Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net>
> news:xnmx5i45luvx$.1l9ed9uwrzthe$.dlg@40tude.net Sat, 20 May 2017
> 22:21:27 GMT in alt.2600, wrote: 
> 
> > On Sat, 20 May 2017 14:00:12 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote:
> > 
> >> Since you left your email addy in your signature block, and,
> >> David Brooks has been able to initiate contact with you via
> >> usenet, expect one or more emails by him 
> > 
> > With something like: "I should be most grateful if you would, in
> > some way, acknowledge receipt of this message" so that he can get
> > your IP# to facilitate his staulking.
> > 
> 
> Heh, it's better than that. Here's what BD does to people that won't
> help him stalk/hack other systems on his behalf and turn over their
> user databases. He'll download what isn't his to keep a copy of,
> modify it, and upload it to youtube. He somehow thinks this works as
> a method of intimidation. The excessive alcohol consumption must
> have done a number on his brain cells. 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkcrTBG_M-Y
> 
> All because of this email correspondence between the two of us, where 
> you can clearly read for yourself, I wouldn't help him stalk or hack 
> others he wanted more information on. I was more than willing to 
> assist him in any malware issues he felt he had, or that he felt any 
> site had, but, not one single time would he/could he provide me a url 
> to examine for evidence of malware, or, collect a sample of such.
> 
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bdemail1.zip
> 
> Anyone who hasn't already read the email archive should do so, to 
> familiarize themselves with what he really is. And anyone who doesn't 
> approve of his activities and would like to speak to him about it, 
> over the phone, via email, and/or in person, can easily do so by 
> viewing this picture:
> 
> http://picpaste.com/01bBZABL.jpg
> 
> Of course, visiting in person must wait until he returns from his 
> drunken binges and boating trips. He delayed contact with police 
> officers that wanted to interview him about an online threat with a 
> 9mm pistol he claimed to have a legal right to have in his possession 
> against another posters kids. So, don't expect the coward to be home 
> during the summer time. Probably better to call ahead and/or email.
> 
> And if you do either, be sure you use a burner phone and/or 
> disposable email address, or, you'll be his next stalking victim.
> 
> It's also worth noting that the police officers who investigated the 
> complaint determined he had no such permits/permission of any sort to 
> have any firearm and he denied having one when they did finally catch 
> upto him. 
> 
> So, he either lied to the other poster about the handgun, or, he lied 
> to the cops about having it. If he does have one, he doesn't have it 
> legally in his country, despite his claims to the contrary. So either 
> way you slice it, the result is the same. He's a liar and every bit 
> the piece of shit I've *always* warned others he was. 
> 
> 

and it should be noted that for over a year you ran mouth that 
if you was ever near him you would beat him.

Then one day you posted you were with in walking distance of his home
in Devon.

Then you turned tail and went home without ever a knock on the door.

Pathetic little guy with a sumo wrestler mouth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#38012 — Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)

FromburfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk>
Date2017-04-05 08:29 -0400
SubjectRe: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime)
Message-ID<oc2nq9$v35$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#38009
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:-
> > Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you.
> We're not discussing 'nyms' - YOU don't HAVE a MICROSOFT ACCOUNT!

On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:10:47 +0100
"David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

> I STILL do not understand WHY '...winston' needs 11 Microsoft
> Accounts.   


Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you david brooks (Devon)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps


csiph-web