Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #37955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-02 15:04 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-05 08:29 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 74 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps
Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) - 2017-04-02 15:04 -0700
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-02 18:13 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime RonTheGuy@null.invalid (Ron) - 2017-04-03 19:56 -0700
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-03 23:01 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-04 03:43 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2017-04-04 00:23 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-04 15:44 +1100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 16:25 -0500
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-04 17:26 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-04 23:46 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 17:25 -0700
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 17:28 -0700
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-05 00:52 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-05 13:35 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 14:49 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 11:12 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 15:28 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 11:43 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 16:13 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-06 12:48 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-06 19:11 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-07 09:51 +1100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-05 10:53 +1100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 18:55 -0700
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-05 12:59 +1100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 20:28 -0700
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-06 07:00 +1100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-05 14:22 -0700
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-04-06 09:37 +1100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-06 11:36 +0100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2017-04-04 13:07 +0100
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-04 11:03 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-04 16:39 -0500
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-04 18:05 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-04 15:20 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-04 17:56 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2017-04-02 20:53 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-03 02:34 +0000
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-03 17:47 -0400
Re: Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-03 18:05 -0400
Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 18:32 +0100
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-04 15:13 -0300
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 19:30 +0100
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 19:54 +0100
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:11 -0400
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-04 20:33 +0100
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-04 18:53 -0300
Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-05 10:30 +0100
Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-05 08:40 -0300
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-04 15:49 -0400
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-04-04 17:41 -0400
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-05 10:10 +0100
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 07:00 -0400
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 07:05 -0400
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-04-05 12:15 +0100
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-05 09:06 -0300
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-19 15:54 +0100
Re: [OT]David Brooks - CYBERCRIMINAL Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-19 12:30 -0300
Re: [OT]David Brooks - CYBERCRIMINAL Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-19 14:35 -0300
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2017-05-19 18:56 -0400
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-20 08:08 +0100
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-20 08:13 +0100
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-05-20 14:00 +0000
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-20 12:43 -0300
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-05-20 17:29 +0100
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-05-20 22:00 -0300
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-05-21 08:34 -0400
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-05-21 13:04 +0000
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Mike_Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2017-05-20 18:21 -0400
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-05-21 13:04 +0000
Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-05-21 11:51 -0400
Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-05 08:29 -0400
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 18:32 +0100 |
| Subject | Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc0l54$iqa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37967 |
Hello again, Phillip Jones :-) I first 'met' you on the Annexcafe User2User group. Then, later, I met you here: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/profile/f90960d0-e642-e011-9577-d485645a8348#user-profile-tab-profile Our mutual 'friend' - '...winston' - then arranged that posts which you and I had made on the 'Microsoft Answers' forums were surrepticiously removed. Do you remember that? WHY would he have done that? Any idea? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 15:13 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oao7ecpp7h2kd9hes9411jeo1qgts43s3m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #37980 |
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:32:10 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >Hello again, Phillip Jones :-) > >I first 'met' you in the public toilet behind the pub in Devon. > Boy were we drunk ! > Do you remember when ... ><family_unsafe_ graphic_details_removed> BD, Usenet is NOT email. Please configure your client correctly. TIA []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 19:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc0oid$fu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37981 |
On 4/4/2017 7:13 PM, Shadow wrote: > On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:32:10 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> Hello again, Phillip Jones :-) > BD, Usenet is NOT email. Please configure your client > correctly. > TIA > []'s When I posted as my deceased friend (a retired Royal Navy Commander, RN (mechanical engineer), THIS is what transpired:- https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/opeople-ocontacts/access-denied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810 What I really like are ANSWERS - valid ones! -- David B aka David Dewgud
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 19:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc0pus$4ut$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37981 |
On 4/4/2017 7:13 PM, Shadow wrote: > BD, Usenet is NOT email. Please configure your client > correctly. > TIA > []'s Indeed! :-) I was posting as David Dewgud, too! One can't trust ANYTHING one sees on the Internet! -- David Dewgud
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 15:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc0quk$9ks$1@uponpenaltyofdeath.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37983 |
On 2017-04-04 2:54 PM, David B. wrote: > On 4/4/2017 7:13 PM, Shadow wrote: > >> BD, Usenet is NOT email. Please configure your client >> correctly. >> TIA >> []'s > > Indeed! :-) > > I was posting as David Dewgud, too! > > One can't trust ANYTHING one sees on the Internet! > Only bad guys change posting nyms as often as you do. -- Froz....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 20:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc0s8u$f9t$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37984 |
On 4/4/2017 8:11 PM, FrozenNorth wrote: > On 2017-04-04 2:54 PM, David B. wrote: >> On 4/4/2017 7:13 PM, Shadow wrote: >> >>> BD, Usenet is NOT email. Please configure your client >>> correctly. >>> TIA >>> []'s >> >> Indeed! :-) >> >> I was posting as David Dewgud, too! >> >> One can't trust ANYTHING one sees on the Internet! >> > Only bad guys change posting nyms as often as you do. No. It's simply a question of teasing out the truth. In real life, I mostly believe what people tell me - especially when I can look them in the eye. Here on Usenet, anything goes, as I expect you will have noticed! -- David Dewgud
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FrozenNorth <frozennorth.ask@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 15:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc0tai$j71$1@uponpenaltyofdeath.dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37985 |
On 2017-04-04 3:33 PM, David B. wrote: > On 4/4/2017 8:11 PM, FrozenNorth wrote: >> On 2017-04-04 2:54 PM, David B. wrote: >>> On 4/4/2017 7:13 PM, Shadow wrote: >>> >>>> BD, Usenet is NOT email. Please configure your client >>>> correctly. >>>> TIA >>>> []'s >>> >>> Indeed! :-) >>> >>> I was posting as David Dewgud, too! >>> >>> One can't trust ANYTHING one sees on the Internet! >>> >> Only bad guys change posting nyms as often as you do. > > No. It's simply a question of teasing out the truth. > > In real life, I mostly believe what people tell me - especially when I > can look them in the eye. Here on Usenet, anything goes, as I expect you > will have noticed! > Not really, I have met some good friends on Usenet over the years, met a few in real life. If you show most people a bit of respect they will return it in kind. Crossposting all over the place, and changing nyms regularly is the mark of a troll and bad guy. -- Froz....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 18:53 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime |
| Message-ID | <3558echni8sauok2ehft987to0it24es1g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #37985 |
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 20:33:42 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> Only bad guys change posting nyms as often as you do. > >No. It's simply a question of teasing out the truth. OK, so after 12 years "teasing" a defunct forum, what is the "truth" ? Just explain what you discovered a give us a brief account of what you reported to the police, and their reply. I'm curious. No links or names please, that would be STALKING. []'s PS OT up, you seem to have accidentally crossposted to TWO off-topic newsgroups. As usual. -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 10:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime |
| Message-ID | <oc2d9l$s18$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37992 |
On 4/4/2017 10:53 PM, Shadow wrote: > On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 20:33:42 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>> Only bad guys change posting nyms as often as you do. >> >> No. It's simply a question of teasing out the truth. > > OK, so after 12 years "teasing" a defunct forum, what is the > "truth" ? I've no idea to what you are referring. > Just explain what you discovered a give us a brief account of > what you reported to the police, and their reply. > > I'm curiorom us. No links or names please, that would be STALKING. > []'s I don't believe you are in any way curious. It's a shame, because when I came to the alt.2600 group I had hoped to get help from some very clever and experienced folk. > PS OT up, you seem to have accidentally crossposted to TWO off-topic > newsgroups. As usual. That was no accident. I had my reasons. :-) -- .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 08:40 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime |
| Message-ID | <orl9ec92nqr2pmduq4okravllsllu3qp8j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #38005 |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:30:22 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 4/4/2017 10:53 PM, Shadow wrote: >> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 20:33:42 +0100, "David B." >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>>> Only bad guys change posting nyms as often as you do. >>> >>> No. It's simply a question of teasing out the truth. >> >> OK, so after 12 years "teasing" a defunct forum, what is the >> "truth" ? > >I've no idea to what you are referring. I know. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 15:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc0t62$c5f$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37980 |
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:32:10 +0100 "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Our mutual 'friend' - '...winston' - Liar! winston is not your friend. He banned you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 17:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc13ue$s5v$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #37980 |
David B. wrote: > Hello again, Phillip Jones :-) > > I first 'met' you on the Annexcafe User2User group. > > Then, later, I met you here: > https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/profile/f90960d0-e642-e011-9577-d485645a8348#user-profile-tab-profile > > > Our mutual 'friend' - '...winston' - then arranged that posts which you > and I had made on the 'Microsoft Answers' forums were surrepticiously > removed. > > Do you remember that? > > WHY would he have done that? Any idea? > Have no idea. Why it was removed. When first started with answers I was just a common user. No I a Community Moderator in the Mac office section. I mostly deal with Word and Excel Mac. Although I answer Mac OS issues that can have an affect/effect on Office Mac. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it" http://www.phillipmjones.net mailto:pjonescet@comcast.net http://phillipjones-cet.net/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 10:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc2c4v$o9o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #37991 |
On 4/4/2017 10:41 PM, PhillipJones wrote: > David B. wrote: >> Hello again, Phillip Jones :-) >> >> I first 'met' you on the Annexcafe User2User group. >> >> Then, later, I met you here: >> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/profile/f90960d0-e642-e011-9577-d485645a8348#user-profile-tab-profile >> >> >> >> Our mutual 'friend' - '...winston' - then arranged that posts which you >> and I had made on the 'Microsoft Answers' forums were surrepticiously >> removed. >> >> Do you remember that? >> >> WHY would he have done that? Any idea? >> > Have no idea. Why it was removed. When first started with answers I was > just a common user. Now I'm a Community Moderator in the Mac office > section. I mostly deal with Word and Excel Mac. Although I answer Mac OS > issues that can have an affect/effect on Office Mac. Hello again, Phillip. Thanks again for responding. :-) I expect you've read here:- https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/opeople-ocontacts/access-denied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810 I STILL do not understand WHY '...winston' needs 11 Microsoft Accounts. Perhaps because he's an MVP; is that it?!! Can YOU explain - or maybe ask on the Microsoft Answers forums. Alternatively , perhaps, ask him on the 'new' User2User newsgroup which is running on the 'news.dogagent.com' server? As far as I can tell, just ONE account provides a 'key' to all sections of the Microsoft empire. That's what it says here anyway:- http://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/account/ One last thing. Can you find out why this item has been deleted? https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/6a77429e-9a0c-4f41-a4a4-cb861b717224#ec6fe26a-3d75-41d4-b0b1-0dbc72bfde30 If you can read my comments under this YouTube video they may prove helpful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ0sou3GHBQ I kept a screenshot of part of my conversation with 'Rob'. You may read same here if you wish:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/wjn1qy8d9om8qy6/Reply%20to%20Rob%20in%20Microsoft%20Answers%20%28JPG%29%202.jpg?dl=0 I'll be most interested in any comments you may like to make. You are one of the few people I've met on-line who I completely trust, Phillip! Have a grand day! :-) -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 07:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc2ii4$t0b$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #38004 |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:10:47 +0100 "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > I'll be most interested in any comments you may like to make. You are > one of the few people I've met on-line who I completely trust, > Phillip! until you don't do his bidding then he will stalk you like several others.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 07:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc2ir6$t0b$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #38004 |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:10:47 +0100 "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > I STILL do not understand WHY '...winston' needs 11 Microsoft > Accounts. Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you david brooks (Devon)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 12:15 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc2jed$fnq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #38008 |
On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:- > Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you. We're not discussing 'nyms' - YOU don't HAVE a MICROSOFT ACCOUNT!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 09:06 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <45n9ectslgkfg9eun6g56dqm00jc9u5a6k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #38009 |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:- >> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you. >We're not discussing 'nyms' Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are aware you were BANNED. Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 16:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <oc3j27$ps4$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #38011 |
On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 09:06:05 -0300 Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > > >On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:- > >> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you. > > >We're not discussing 'nyms' > > Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've > been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are aware you > were BANNED. > Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific. > []'s Have you filed a complaint with the Devon constabulary? Good money says nope, just running your gilie man mouth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-19 15:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]Ping: Phillip Jones (was : Photoshop CS4 and Java SE 6 Runtime) |
| Message-ID | <ofn0o0$q3d$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #38011 |
On 4/5/2017 1:06 PM, Shadow wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B." > <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:- >>> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you. > >> We're not discussing 'nyms' > > Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've > been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are aware you > were BANNED. > Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific. > []'s > Do you consider www.answers.microsoft.com to be a PRIVATE server? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shadow <Sh@dow.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-19 12:30 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: [OT]David Brooks - CYBERCRIMINAL |
| Message-ID | <oq2uhc56o2qlgrk061e7tlmdb59gjdhfb5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #38184 |
On Fri, 19 May 2017 15:54:03 +0100, "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >On 4/5/2017 1:06 PM, Shadow wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:15:17 +0100, "David B." >> <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> On 4/5/2017 12:05 PM, burfordTjustice claimed wrongly:- >>>> Still does not equal the number of NYMs used by you. >> >>> We're not discussing 'nyms' >> >> Yes we are. It's a crime to access a PRIVATE server you've >> been BANNED on. Creating countless new nyms is proof you are aware you >> were BANNED. >> Read the BRITISH law. It's quite specific. >> []'s >> > >Do you consider <STALKING_REMOVED> to be a PRIVATE server? Any server you do not OWN is PRIVATE. It belongs to someone else. It can have public access, but you must abide by their rules. So of course you are a CRIMINAL for hacking it (if that's what you are asking). You broke the law. Drinking more recently ? What a stuuuupid question, even for you. []'s PS Why did you cross-post this to a Mac group ? STALKING there too ? I also fixed the subject line, It contained a third party's name, totally unrelated to your post, a big no-no on Usenet. Say TY -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps
csiph-web