Re: Future of Quicken?

From	BreadWithSpam@fractious.net
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject	Re: Future of Quicken?
Date	2011-03-05 15:14 -0500
Organization	dyslexic agnostics unsure about a dog
Message-ID	<yobsjv18gud.fsf@panix2.panix.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <yob1v2mq1z3.fsf@panix1.panix.com> <0001HW.C9978893019E6CB6B02919BF@news.astraweb.com> <1jxnha6.15w7fs8r8iz1wN%mikePOST@TOGROUPmacconsult.com> <yobipvx8t4x.fsf@panix3.panix.com> <1jxne2h.1m7umynzkhs7yN%nospam@see.signature>

Show all headers | View raw

nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) writes:
> <BreadWithSpam@fractious.net> wrote:

>> Alternatively, just choice a point in time, say the beginning
>> of 2011, and give up your history before then.  Start from scratch
>> with one of the alternatives and live with the loss of history.
>
> Seems to me you overstate it in saying that you "give up your history
> before then." I did the start from scratch thing (using MoneyDance in my
> case). But it doesn't mean I lost all my history. It is still there in
> the Quicken file (Windows version - I never found the Mac one
> acceptable).

If Quicken2007 ceases to work (there is talk of Rosetta not
coming in Lion), then keeping your history in your Q2007 file
is useless.  And as I said, importing old data into anything
else (including the Windows version of Quicken) may ential a
huge mess, as the process requires the QIF file.

-- 
Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks.  The rest gets trashed.

Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Future of Quicken? AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-03-01 10:11 -0800
  Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-01 13:50 -0500
    Re: Future of Quicken? Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2011-03-01 17:06 -0500
      Re: Future of Quicken? Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-01 15:49 -0800
        Re: Future of Quicken? massello@newsguy.com (Neill Massello) - 2011-03-01 18:22 -0700
          Re: Future of Quicken? Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-01 19:45 -0800
          Re: Future of Quicken? Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2011-03-02 12:00 -0800
            Re: Future of Quicken? Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-02 16:21 -0800
    Re: Future of Quicken? AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-03-01 22:21 -0800
  Re: Future of Quicken? HowdyDoody <howdy@doody.com> - 2011-03-02 08:48 -0600
    Re: Future of Quicken? AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-03-02 07:25 -0800
  Re: Future of Quicken? Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2011-03-03 09:16 -0700
    Re: Future of Quicken? mikePOST@TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) - 2011-03-03 18:17 -0500
      Re: Future of Quicken? Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2011-03-03 23:50 -0700
      Re: Future of Quicken? Paul Anderson <paulranderson@charter.net> - 2011-03-04 11:01 -0500
        Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-04 11:34 -0500
          Re: Future of Quicken? Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2011-03-05 06:28 -0500
            Re: Future of Quicken? mikePOST@TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) - 2011-03-05 09:36 -0500
              Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-05 10:49 -0500
                Re: Future of Quicken? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2011-03-05 08:35 -0800
                Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-05 15:14 -0500

csiph-web