Re: Future of Quicken?

Date	2011-03-02 12:00 -0800
From	Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net>
Organization	Magicon Inc.
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject	Re: Future of Quicken?
References	<siegman-734CE0.10111901032011@bmedcfsc-srv02.tufts.ad.tufts.edu> <yobei6qbrpb.fsf@panix3.panix.com> <0001HW.C992D82F00A7170EB02919BF@news.astraweb.com> <nospam-96659B.15494201032011@news.eternal-september.org> <1jxgqp9.oxz9m317imzl2N%massello@newsguy.com>
Message-ID	<M9udnRGflb9nPPPQnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Neill Massello wrote:
> Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> That said, I'm staying with Quicken 2007 until something markedly better
>> comes along. 
> 
> Or until you have to run a version of Mac OS X that no longer supports
> PPC binaries, which might happen as soon as 10.7 (Lion). There's a
> thread about this in comp.sys.mac.system. 

I keep my accounts in Excel, and do the processing with a bunch of 
macros I wrote.

Years ago I tried exporting to Quicken via QIF; but I found that if you 
had two transactions for the same amount on the same day without a 
cheque number (e.g. two cash withdrawals for the same amount), it 
considered them the same transaction.

So that was that.

I'd be interested to know if they've fixed the bug, though.

Paul Magnussen

Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Future of Quicken? AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-03-01 10:11 -0800
  Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-01 13:50 -0500
    Re: Future of Quicken? Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2011-03-01 17:06 -0500
      Re: Future of Quicken? Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-01 15:49 -0800
        Re: Future of Quicken? massello@newsguy.com (Neill Massello) - 2011-03-01 18:22 -0700
          Re: Future of Quicken? Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-01 19:45 -0800
          Re: Future of Quicken? Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2011-03-02 12:00 -0800
            Re: Future of Quicken? Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-02 16:21 -0800
    Re: Future of Quicken? AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-03-01 22:21 -0800
  Re: Future of Quicken? HowdyDoody <howdy@doody.com> - 2011-03-02 08:48 -0600
    Re: Future of Quicken? AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-03-02 07:25 -0800
  Re: Future of Quicken? Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2011-03-03 09:16 -0700
    Re: Future of Quicken? mikePOST@TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) - 2011-03-03 18:17 -0500
      Re: Future of Quicken? Howard S Shubs <howard@shubs.net> - 2011-03-03 23:50 -0700
      Re: Future of Quicken? Paul Anderson <paulranderson@charter.net> - 2011-03-04 11:01 -0500
        Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-04 11:34 -0500
          Re: Future of Quicken? Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2011-03-05 06:28 -0500
            Re: Future of Quicken? mikePOST@TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) - 2011-03-05 09:36 -0500
              Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-05 10:49 -0500
                Re: Future of Quicken? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2011-03-05 08:35 -0800
                Re: Future of Quicken? BreadWithSpam@fractious.net - 2011-03-05 15:14 -0500

csiph-web