Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #47359
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> |
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps, comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: did this group die? |
| Date | Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:20:28 -0400 |
| Organization | Camembert Normand au Lait Cru |
| Message-ID | <vg6mld$3ctt$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <o2OdnbgnQY09kL36nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vfvg3r$2kdki$1@dont-email.me> <2TLUO.90949$lm45.30546@fx05.iad> <MRicnbWE5_daVL76nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vg21ta$35l2t$1@dont-email.me> <vg30do$km$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vg61vb$3ume3$2@dont-email.me> <vg69k7$3vvh5$2@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:20:29 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | solani.org; logging-data="111549"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Betterbird/115.16.1 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:MVUS2Yep7Jg4frqv2PEKYVRbDVg= |
| In-Reply-To | <vg69k7$3vvh5$2@dont-email.me> |
| X-User-ID | eJwNwokRACEIBLCWVJavHFmk/xLuJlGxbXSYGnR+4HV/EXGSm10wQsiokEXW3Nd9VmJGedI+KWgRzg== |
| Content-Language | de-CH, en-GB |
| Xref | csiph.com misc.phone.mobile.iphone:190508 comp.sys.mac.apps:47359 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:134734 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On 02.11.24 18:37, sms wrote: > On 11/2/2024 1:27 PM, Tom Elam wrote: > > <snip> > >> But Android owners upgrade phones more often than iPhone owners. >> >> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-s-official-android-phone- >> owners-upgrade-more-often-than-iphone-users/ar-AA1seZ2t? >> ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=acd4d3617ea848eb984eda2761425876&ei=28 >> >> Explain that > > Here are some reasons that I can postulate: (Crap snipped) You are a speculating idiot and Troll not delivering the smallest piece of evidence for anything. -- "De gustibus non est disputandum."
Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: did this group die? Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-01 16:42 +0000
Re: did this group die? Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2024-11-02 16:27 -0400
Re: did this group die? sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2024-11-02 15:37 -0700
Re: did this group die? Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-11-02 22:20 -0400
Re: did this group die? *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> - 2024-11-03 02:26 +0000
Re: did this group die? Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-03 03:36 +0000
Re: did this group die? Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2024-11-03 08:18 -0500
Re: did this group die? Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-03 15:14 +0000
Re: did this group die? Nick Cine <nickcine@is.invalid> - 2024-11-03 10:44 -0700
Re: did this group die? Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-03 09:55 -0800
Re: did this group die? Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2024-11-04 08:42 -0500
Re: did this group die? Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-04 16:14 +0000
Re: did this group die? Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2024-11-04 13:07 -0500
Re: did this group die? Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-04 16:29 +0000
Re: did this group die? rlhamil@smart.net (Richard L. Hamilton) - 2024-11-04 17:03 +0000
Re: did this group die? Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-04 17:24 +0000
Re: did this group die? Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2024-11-04 15:01 -0500
csiph-web