Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #6286 > unrolled thread

Moving ISP

Started by"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk>
First post2012-09-03 09:56 +0100
Last post2012-09-28 13:28 +0100
Articles 20 on this page of 112 — 35 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc


Contents

  Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 09:56 +0100
    Re: Moving ISP Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2012-09-03 10:13 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 11:16 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-03 12:32 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 13:39 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-03 16:08 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-03 23:16 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 13:13 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 13:37 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Alan Wrigley <spamhater@keepyourfilthyspamtoyourself.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 13:50 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-09-06 10:06 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2012-09-11 13:14 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-11 20:03 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2012-09-03 18:26 +0100
    Re: Moving ISP M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2012-09-03 11:41 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 13:43 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-03 14:08 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP "Derek.Moody" <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> - 2012-09-03 19:33 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-03 23:22 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP "Derek.Moody" <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> - 2012-09-03 23:45 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-04 08:00 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 10:42 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 11:24 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 12:13 +0100
                    Re: Moving ISP Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 13:55 +0100
                      Re: Moving ISP Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 16:07 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-04 11:23 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 13:53 +0100
                    Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-04 20:23 +0100
                      Re: Moving ISP druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-09-04 21:24 +0100
                        Re: Moving ISP Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 23:19 +0100
                        Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-05 07:46 +0100
                      Re: Moving ISP Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-09-04 23:16 +0100
                    Re: Moving ISP Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 13:10 +0100
                      Re: Moving ISP Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 14:12 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-04 17:53 +0100
                    Re: Moving ISP Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-09-05 13:14 +0100
                      Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 14:19 +0100
                        Re: Moving ISP Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2012-09-05 18:12 +0100
                        Re: Moving ISP John Sandford <lists@thesandfords.me.uk> - 2012-09-05 20:45 +0100
                          Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 23:47 +0100
                            Re: Moving ISP cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-09-06 10:10 +0100
                              Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-06 10:23 +0100
                        Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-05 17:50 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-09-11 16:46 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-09-04 21:14 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2012-09-04 10:15 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-03 23:21 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-03 23:20 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP Jim Nagel <jimnewsm10d@abbeypress.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 22:36 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-09-11 16:57 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-11 20:39 +0100
    Re: Moving ISP Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 22:05 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP Chris Newman <cvjazz@waitrose.com> - 2012-09-03 22:39 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Folderol <folderol@ukfsn.org> - 2012-09-03 22:46 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP Alan Wrigley <spamhater@keepyourfilthyspamtoyourself.co.uk> - 2012-09-03 23:08 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-03 23:02 +0100
    Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 10:15 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2012-09-05 11:06 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 11:16 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-05 11:47 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 13:06 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP Jim Nagel <jimnewsm10d@abbeypress.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 22:15 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-09-05 23:14 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 23:49 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-06 08:02 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 12:11 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-09-09 20:11 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2012-09-09 21:12 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-09-10 10:17 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP Paul Oates <oatespaul@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-10 17:39 +0100
                    Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-11 07:54 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-09-05 13:33 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP (OT) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-09-09 12:25 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP (OT) Alan Wrigley <spamhater@keepyourfilthyspamtoyourself.co.uk> - 2012-09-09 12:41 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP (OT) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-09-09 13:12 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP (OT) "Felicity S." <Flcty@rdsqurrl.com> - 2012-09-10 18:50 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP (OT) Folderol <folderol@ukfsn.org> - 2012-09-10 20:56 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) Alan Wrigley <spamhater@keepyourfilthyspamtoyourself.co.uk> - 2012-09-10 22:05 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-09-10 22:20 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-10 22:23 +0000
                    Re: Moving ISP (OT) Folderol <folderol@ukfsn.org> - 2012-09-11 07:13 +0100
                      Re: Moving ISP (OT) Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-09-11 12:31 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) "Felicity S." <Flcty@rdsqurrl.com> - 2012-09-11 00:47 +0100
                    Re: Moving ISP (OT) Folderol <folderol@ukfsn.org> - 2012-09-11 07:14 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP (OT) "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-09-11 06:47 +0000
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-11 10:28 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-09-11 16:14 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) "Felicity S." <Flcty@rdsqurrl.com> - 2012-09-12 18:58 +0100
                    Re: Moving ISP (OT) Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-09-12 19:32 +0100
                      Re: Moving ISP (OT) "Felicity S." <Flcty@rdsqurrl.com> - 2012-09-13 00:38 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP (OT) Graham Thurlwell <nospam@jades.org> - 2012-09-10 19:28 +0100
                  Re: Moving ISP (OT) "Felicity S." <Flcty@rdsqurrl.com> - 2012-09-12 18:55 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP (OT) Fred Bambrough <fred@[127.0.0.1]> - 2012-09-09 17:49 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-05 17:51 +0100
    Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-21 14:44 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-21 15:40 +0100
      Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-21 19:28 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-22 09:43 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-09-22 10:37 +0100
        Re: Moving ISP NedA <news@ned.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-22 10:10 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-22 13:13 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2012-09-22 14:09 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-22 14:59 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-22 14:21 +0100
          Re: Moving ISP Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-27 20:00 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP JTM <usenetbin@free.fr> - 2012-09-27 21:01 +0100
            Re: Moving ISP NedA <news@ned.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-28 10:27 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-28 11:34 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-28 12:59 +0100
              Re: Moving ISP Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-28 13:02 +0100
                Re: Moving ISP "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-09-28 13:28 +0100

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →


#6316

Fromspampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com>
Date2012-09-04 08:00 +0100
Message-ID<52c9cea68espam.pling@btinternet.com>
In reply to#6314
In article <ant032235868BxcK@strongarm.half-baked-idea.co.uk>,
   Derek.Moody <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> wrote:
> If you are out of the minimum period, when you leave BT, 

That presupposes that the possibility of using something other than BT or a
BT reseller is likely to arise. The village is cabled by BT only and the
LLU is limited to the opal telecom setup (Talk Talk) nothing available
gives better speed (I've checked with other people in the village and they
all suffer bad or even abysmal bandwidth.

Now that the BT period (to keep the phone number I've always had, but Talk
Talk wouldn't release to anyone but back to BT) has ended I can look at
Plusnet or similar (BT by a different name)

-- 

Steve Pampling

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6318

FromChris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 10:42 +0100
Message-ID<ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>
In reply to#6316
In article <52c9cea68espam.pling@btinternet.com>, spampling
<URL:mailto:spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:
> In article <ant032235868BxcK@strongarm.half-baked-idea.co.uk>,
>    Derek.Moody <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> wrote:
> > If you are out of the minimum period, when you leave BT, 
> 
> That presupposes that the possibility of using something other than BT or a
> BT reseller is likely to arise. The village is cabled by BT only and the
> LLU is limited to the opal telecom setup (Talk Talk) nothing available
> gives better speed (I've checked with other people in the village and they
> all suffer bad or even abysmal bandwidth.
> 
> Now that the BT period (to keep the phone number I've always had, but Talk
> Talk wouldn't release to anyone but back to BT) has ended I can look at
> Plusnet or similar (BT by a different name)

I would expect that for 99% of people 99% of the time their speed is
governed by the physical network they are connected to.
If you are on a cable network then you have no choice of ISP
All other connections will be via the BT network, so you speeed will be
goverened by BT (Unless your ISP have really screwed things up.)
Any ISP claiming they can increase our speed by swapping to them is doing
wishfull thinking (Unless you have a capped rate with your current ISP)

When changing ISPs there is one other thing to remember if you are using old
software like the Ant Suite which does not do Authenticated SMTP.
Whilst Authenticated SMTP is NOT required by Talk Talk in its many guises,
BT I belive and most other ISP do now require it.

Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated SMTP?

Chris Evans

-- 
CJE Micro's / 4D                'RISC OS Specialists'
Telephone: 01903 523222             Fax: 01903 523679
chris@cjemicros.co.uk     http://www.cjemicros.co.uk/
78 Brighton Road, Worthing, West Sussex,     BN11 2EN
The most beautiful thing anyone can wear, is a smile!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6319

Fromcharles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 11:24 +0100
Message-ID<52c9e15d62charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk>
In reply to#6318
In article <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>, Chris Evans
<chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <52c9cea68espam.pling@btinternet.com>, spampling
> <URL:mailto:spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > In article <ant032235868BxcK@strongarm.half-baked-idea.co.uk>,
> >    Derek.Moody <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> wrote:
> > > If you are out of the minimum period, when you leave BT, 
> > 
> > That presupposes that the possibility of using something other than BT
> > or a BT reseller is likely to arise. The village is cabled by BT only
> > and the LLU is limited to the opal telecom setup (Talk Talk) nothing
> > available gives better speed (I've checked with other people in the
> > village and they all suffer bad or even abysmal bandwidth.
> > 
> > Now that the BT period (to keep the phone number I've always had, but
> > Talk Talk wouldn't release to anyone but back to BT) has ended I can
> > look at Plusnet or similar (BT by a different name)

> I would expect that for 99% of people 99% of the time their speed is
> governed by the physical network they are connected to. If you are on a
> cable network then you have no choice of ISP All other connections will
> be via the BT network, so you speeed will be goverened by BT (Unless your
> ISP have really screwed things up.) Any ISP claiming they can increase
> our speed by swapping to them is doing wishfull thinking (Unless you have
> a capped rate with your current ISP)

there could be a possible speed increase during busy times if they use a
different contention ratio - but the maximum speed is fixed by physics.

-- 
From KT24 

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6320

FromStuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 12:13 +0100
Message-ID<52c9e5d897Spambin@argonet.co.uk>
In reply to#6318
In article <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>,
   Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:

> When changing ISPs there is one other thing to remember if you are using
> old software like the Ant Suite which does not do Authenticated SMTP.
> Whilst Authenticated SMTP is NOT required by Talk Talk in its many
> guises, BT I belive and most other ISP do now require it.

> Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated SMTP?

No problems connecting with Orpheus.

When I had a question recently regarding speeds, and sent them an email,
Richard phoned me back and we spent about 3/4 hour discussing internet
speeds and options and problems I was having with my LAN.

He then phoned me back again with suggestions regarding my LAN, after
speaking to his technical personnel.

I am sure they will try their best to retain connectivity for RISC OS
machines and I intend shortly to be moving to fibre with them

-- 
Stuart Winsor

Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6323

FromChris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 13:55 +0100
Message-ID<8122efc952.chris@o2.co.uk>
In reply to#6320
In message <52c9e5d897Spambin@argonet.co.uk>
          Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>,
>    Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:

>> When changing ISPs there is one other thing to remember if you are using
>> old software like the Ant Suite which does not do Authenticated SMTP.
>> Whilst Authenticated SMTP is NOT required by Talk Talk in its many
>> guises, BT I belive and most other ISP do now require it.

>> Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated SMTP?

> No problems connecting with Orpheus.

> When I had a question recently regarding speeds, and sent them an email,
> Richard phoned me back and we spent about 3/4 hour discussing internet
> speeds and options and problems I was having with my LAN.

> He then phoned me back again with suggestions regarding my LAN, after
> speaking to his technical personnel.

> I am sure they will try their best to retain connectivity for RISC OS
> machines and I intend shortly to be moving to fibre with them

Orpheus are a customer of BT Wholesale and the same with the Fibre 
service.



-- 
Chris Hughes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6325

FromStuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 16:07 +0100
Message-ID<52c9fb4717Spambin@argonet.co.uk>
In reply to#6323
In article <8122efc952.chris@o2.co.uk>,
   Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
> Orpheus are a customer of BT Wholesale and the same with the Fibre 
> service.

Yes but it's the ISP that determines the required connection protocols not
the bit of "string" used in between.

-- 
Stuart Winsor

Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6321

FromChris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net>
Date2012-09-04 11:23 +0100
Message-ID<52c9e14929chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net>
In reply to#6318
In article <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>,
   Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:
> Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated
> SMTP?

Plusnet doesn't at the moment.

-- 
Chris Johnson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6322

FromChris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 13:53 +0100
Message-ID<71feeec952.chris@o2.co.uk>
In reply to#6318
In message <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>
          Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <52c9cea68espam.pling@btinternet.com>, spampling
> <URL:mailto:spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> In article <ant032235868BxcK@strongarm.half-baked-idea.co.uk>,
>>    Derek.Moody <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> wrote:
>>> If you are out of the minimum period, when you leave BT,
>> 
>> That presupposes that the possibility of using something other than BT or a
>> BT reseller is likely to arise. The village is cabled by BT only and the
>> LLU is limited to the opal telecom setup (Talk Talk) nothing available
>> gives better speed (I've checked with other people in the village and they
>> all suffer bad or even abysmal bandwidth.
>> 
>> Now that the BT period (to keep the phone number I've always had, but Talk
>> Talk wouldn't release to anyone but back to BT) has ended I can look at
>> Plusnet or similar (BT by a different name)

> I would expect that for 99% of people 99% of the time their speed is
> governed by the physical network they are connected to.
> If you are on a cable network then you have no choice of ISP
> All other connections will be via the BT network, so you speeed will be
> goverened by BT (Unless your ISP have really screwed things up.)
> Any ISP claiming they can increase our speed by swapping to them is doing
> wishfull thinking (Unless you have a capped rate with your current ISP)

Sorry, but this is inaccurate information.

There are 5 types of ISP's

Those using BT wholesale (probably the majority)

There is Cable provide by Virgin

There is Satellite (of most use in more difficult to access areas)

There are Mobile Broadband services

There are also LLU unbundled ISP - although they do use the Bt wires, 
they have there own kit in the Exchane and since they generally use 
ADSL2+ can offer faster speeds - BT Wholesale don't control the speed 
of these connections since the only bit of there kit involved is the 
wires. Companies like O2, BE, etc..

I have two ADSL lines here, one is a BT provide service 2Meg service 
1.6meg really and they say they can't improve it.

But the O2 LLU connection I have over BT Wholesale wires is currently 
running at 5Mb

> When changing ISPs there is one other thing to remember if you are using old
> software like the Ant Suite which does not do Authenticated SMTP.
> Whilst Authenticated SMTP is NOT required by Talk Talk in its many guises,
> BT I belive and most other ISP do now require it.

> Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated SMTP?

Rumour has it, all UK ISP's will be introducing it


-- 
Chris Hughes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6332

Fromspampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com>
Date2012-09-04 20:23 +0100
Message-ID<52ca12b8c9spam.pling@btinternet.com>
In reply to#6322
In article <71feeec952.chris@o2.co.uk>,
   Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
> BT Wholesale don't control the speed 
> of these connections since the only bit of there kit involved is the 
> wires. 
<snip>
The back haul is normally BT

> I have two ADSL lines here, one is a BT provide service 2Meg service 
> 1.6meg really and they say they can't improve it.

Tends to be distance dependent with a component for age of install and
hence cable quality plus an allowance for the age of the exchange kit (all
exchanges are being updated so you may find a service interruption and then
a speed increase. We had a business line at work that had that scenario
(they blamed the interruption on our kit

> But the O2 LLU connection I have over BT Wholesale wires is currently 
> running at 5Mb

Which eliminates the problem of distance as they will be the same length as
the wires for the BT service so the other line set is probably older cable.

> > Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated SMTP?

> Rumour has it, all UK ISP's will be introducing it

Quite likely, it reduces the possibility of open relays

-- 

Steve Pampling

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6335

Fromdruck <news@druck.org.uk>
Date2012-09-04 21:24 +0100
Message-ID<k25o2c$6c6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#6332
On 04/09/2012 20:23, spampling wrote:
> In article <71feeec952.chris@o2.co.uk>,
>     Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
>> I have two ADSL lines here, one is a BT provide service 2Meg service
>> 1.6meg really and they say they can't improve it.

[Snip]

> Which eliminates the problem of distance as they will be the same length as
> the wires for the BT service so the other line set is probably older cable.

Not necessarily, at a former employer, they had 2 ADSL lines with 
different speeds, and found one of them came from a different exchange 
to the other. The business site was served by two exchanges, and it was 
a matter of luck to which one you got hooked up to.

Cheers
---David

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6339

FromChris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 23:19 +0100
Message-ID<b2c722ca52.chris@o2.co.uk>
In reply to#6335
In message <k25o2c$6c6$1@dont-email.me>
          druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:

> On 04/09/2012 20:23, spampling wrote:
>> In article <71feeec952.chris@o2.co.uk>,
>>     Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
>>> I have two ADSL lines here, one is a BT provide service 2Meg service
>>> 1.6meg really and they say they can't improve it.

> [Snip]

>> Which eliminates the problem of distance as they will be the same length as
>> the wires for the BT service so the other line set is probably older cable.

> Not necessarily, at a former employer, they had 2 ADSL lines with
> different speeds, and found one of them came from a different exchange
> to the other. The business site was served by two exchanges, and it was
> a matter of luck to which one you got hooked up to.

Interesting you should mention that. Because we are actually covered 
by 4 main exchanges.


-- 
Chris Hughes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6341

Fromspampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com>
Date2012-09-05 07:46 +0100
Message-ID<52ca512ee5spam.pling@btinternet.com>
In reply to#6335
In article <k25o2c$6c6$1@dont-email.me>,
   druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
> The business site was served by two exchanges, and it was 
> a matter of luck to which one you got hooked up to.

That would be nice - we actually want two lines with the capability to
expand to 100Mb feeding into our buildings with a matching setup at our
satellite site. In both cases it can be provided at a cost a little short
of the national debt.

-- 

Steve Pampling

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6338

FromChris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk>
Date2012-09-04 23:16 +0100
Message-ID<4b9322ca52.chris@o2.co.uk>
In reply to#6332
In message <52ca12b8c9spam.pling@btinternet.com>
          spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:

> In article <71feeec952.chris@o2.co.uk>,
>    Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
>> BT Wholesale don't control the speed
>> of these connections since the only bit of there kit involved is the
>> wires.
> <snip>
> The back haul is normally BT

>> I have two ADSL lines here, one is a BT provide service 2Meg service
>> 1.6meg really and they say they can't improve it.

> Tends to be distance dependent with a component for age of install and
> hence cable quality plus an allowance for the age of the exchange kit (all
> exchanges are being updated so you may find a service interruption and then
> a speed increase. We had a business line at work that had that scenario
> (they blamed the interruption on our kit

Its a newer line then the one used for the O2 LLU service. It was 
specially installed.

>> But the O2 LLU connection I have over BT Wholesale wires is currently
>> running at 5Mb

> Which eliminates the problem of distance as they will be the same length as
> the wires for the BT service so the other line set is probably older cable.

I was initially told I would get about 4Mb by O2 and indeed I go that 
on first connection and then it slowly increased to 5Mb, its now back 
at around 4.5 Mb now

>>> Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated SMTP?

>> Rumour has it, all UK ISP's will be introducing it

> Quite likely, it reduces the possibility of open relays

Agreed.

-- 
Chris Hughes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6353

FromChris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk>
Date2012-09-05 13:10 +0100
Message-ID<ant051257313pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>
In reply to#6322
In article <71feeec952.chris@o2.co.uk>, Chris Hughes
<URL:mailto:news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>
>           Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > In article <52c9cea68espam.pling@btinternet.com>, spampling
> > <URL:mailto:spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:
> >> In article <ant032235868BxcK@strongarm.half-baked-idea.co.uk>,
> >>    Derek.Moody <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> wrote:
> >>> If you are out of the minimum period, when you leave BT,
> >> 
> >> That presupposes that the possibility of using something other than BT or a
> >> BT reseller is likely to arise. The village is cabled by BT only and the
> >> LLU is limited to the opal telecom setup (Talk Talk) nothing available
> >> gives better speed (I've checked with other people in the village and they
> >> all suffer bad or even abysmal bandwidth.
> >> 
> >> Now that the BT period (to keep the phone number I've always had, but Talk
> >> Talk wouldn't release to anyone but back to BT) has ended I can look at
> >> Plusnet or similar (BT by a different name)
> 
> > I would expect that for 99% of people 99% of the time their speed is
> > governed by the physical network they are connected to.
> > If you are on a cable network then you have no choice of ISP
> > All other connections will be via the BT network, so you speeed will be
> > goverened by BT (Unless your ISP have really screwed things up.)
> > Any ISP claiming they can increase our speed by swapping to them is doing
> > wishfull thinking (Unless you have a capped rate with your current ISP)
> 
> Sorry, but this is inaccurate information.

Simplistic yes!

But your type 4 & 5 both use BT cableing to get from your house to the
exchange! 
 
> There are 5 types of ISP's
> 
> Those using BT wholesale (probably the majority)
> 
> There is Cable provide by Virgin
> 
> There is Satellite (of most use in more difficult to access areas)
> 
> There are Mobile Broadband services
> 
> There are also LLU unbundled ISP - although they do use the Bt wires, 
> they have there own kit in the Exchane and since they generally use 
> ADSL2+ can offer faster speeds - BT Wholesale don't control the speed 
> of these connections since the only bit of there kit involved is the 
> wires. Companies like O2, BE, etc..
> 
> I have two ADSL lines here, one is a BT provide service 2Meg service 
> 1.6meg really and they say they can't improve it.
> 
> But the O2 LLU connection I have over BT Wholesale wires is currently 
> running at 5Mb

Unusual! As the limiting factor when that slow surely must be the cableing
from your house to the exchange which BT Openreach? is responsible for.
I suspect that connection to the LLU line may use more recent cableing to
the area/road connection box from the exchange. 

So it sounds like a bit of a lottery, if you order a new line they you would
probably be wired into the more recent cabling but could be connected up
with the old!

But I suspect just changing ISPs will almost certainly use the same wire to
connect to you exchange!

Given the above it does make it very difficult for ISP to quote the speed
you will probably get!
 
> > When changing ISPs there is one other thing to remember if you are using old
> > software like the Ant Suite which does not do Authenticated SMTP.
> > Whilst Authenticated SMTP is NOT required by Talk Talk in its many guises,
> > BT I belive and most other ISP do now require it.
> 
> > Anyone know of any other ISP that does not require Authenticated SMTP?
> 
> Rumour has it, all UK ISP's will be introducing it
> 
> 


Chris Evans

-- 
CJE Micro's / 4D                'RISC OS Specialists'
Telephone: 01903 523222             Fax: 01903 523679
chris@cjemicros.co.uk     http://www.cjemicros.co.uk/
78 Brighton Road, Worthing, West Sussex,     BN11 2EN
The most beautiful thing anyone can wear, is a smile!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6355

FromChris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk>
Date2012-09-05 14:12 +0100
Message-ID<3c9174ca52.chris@o2.co.uk>
In reply to#6353
In message <ant051257313pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>
          Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <71feeec952.chris@o2.co.uk>, Chris Hughes
> <URL:mailto:news@noonehere.co.uk> wrote:
>> In message <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>
>>           Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> In article <52c9cea68espam.pling@btinternet.com>, spampling
>>> <URL:mailto:spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <ant032235868BxcK@strongarm.half-baked-idea.co.uk>,
>>>>    Derek.Moody <derek.moody@casterbridge.net> wrote:
>>>>> If you are out of the minimum period, when you leave BT,
>>>> 
>>>> That presupposes that the possibility of using something other than BT
>>>> or a
>>>> BT reseller is likely to arise. The village is cabled by BT only and the
>>>> LLU is limited to the opal telecom setup (Talk Talk) nothing available
>>>> gives better speed (I've checked with other people in the village and they
>>>> all suffer bad or even abysmal bandwidth.
>>>> 
>>>> Now that the BT period (to keep the phone number I've always had, but Talk
>>>> Talk wouldn't release to anyone but back to BT) has ended I can look at
>>>> Plusnet or similar (BT by a different name)
>> 
>>> I would expect that for 99% of people 99% of the time their speed is
>>> governed by the physical network they are connected to.
>>> If you are on a cable network then you have no choice of ISP
>>> All other connections will be via the BT network, so you speeed will be
>>> goverened by BT (Unless your ISP have really screwed things up.)
>>> Any ISP claiming they can increase our speed by swapping to them is doing
>>> wishfull thinking (Unless you have a capped rate with your current ISP)
>> 
>> Sorry, but this is inaccurate information.

> Simplistic yes!

> But your type 4 & 5 both use BT cableing to get from your house to the
> exchange!

Mobile Broadband does not use BT wires at all !!

While its true the LLU one will use the existing BT line from house to 
exchange, the rest of it on the LLU network, not BT.

>> There are 5 types of ISP's
>> 
>> Those using BT wholesale (probably the majority)
>> 
>> There is Cable provide by Virgin
>> 
>> There is Satellite (of most use in more difficult to access areas)
>> 
>> There are Mobile Broadband services
>> 
>> There are also LLU unbundled ISP - although they do use the Bt wires,
>> they have there own kit in the Exchane and since they generally use
>> ADSL2+ can offer faster speeds - BT Wholesale don't control the speed
>> of these connections since the only bit of there kit involved is the
>> wires. Companies like O2, BE, etc..
>> 
>> I have two ADSL lines here, one is a BT provide service 2Meg service
>> 1.6meg really and they say they can't improve it.
>> 
>> But the O2 LLU connection I have over BT Wholesale wires is currently
>> running at 5Mb

> Unusual! As the limiting factor when that slow surely must be the cableing
> from your house to the exchange which BT Openreach? is responsible for.
> I suspect that connection to the LLU line may use more recent cableing to
> the area/road connection box from the exchange.

Since the slow BT connection *is* a new line!

And its not unusual at all, its more like ADSL2 as against ADSL2+

> So it sounds like a bit of a lottery, if you order a new line they you would
> probably be wired into the more recent cabling but could be connected up
> with the old!

That is entirely possible, you can also be sent via other exchanges 
that have spare circuits but your phone one is on your local exchange.

At one time at work, I had access to some interesting BT systems (well 
BT OPenreach/Wholesale) and we could see that some of our numbers were 
in fact being routed through other exchanges due to capacity issues).

Also if you move property in the same exchange area and keep your 
phone number they simply re-route the number via changing settings via 
a computer terminal. That saves BT money....

> But I suspect just changing ISPs will almost certainly use the same wire to
> connect to you exchange!

Yep, I was with Demon before O2 on the same number and Demon was 
usually around 2Mb, soon as I changed the difference was amazing.


-- 
Chris Hughes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6329

Fromspampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com>
Date2012-09-04 17:53 +0100
Message-ID<52ca04ee7aspam.pling@btinternet.com>
In reply to#6318
In article <ant040909b49pErr@client.cjemicros.co.uk>, Chris Evans
<chris@cjemicros.co.uk> wrote:
> When changing ISPs there is one other thing to remember if you are using
> old software like the Ant Suite which does not do Authenticated SMTP.

Question (long time since I looked at things like AntSuite ) is the mail
transfer in that done by Popstar?
If so, I have an answer.

-- 

Steve Pampling

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6350

FromJeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>
Date2012-09-05 13:14 +0100
Message-ID<mpro.m9vlzf002m46d02m4@wingsandbeaks.org.uk.invalid>
In reply to#6329
spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:

>Question (long time since I looked at things like AntSuite ) is the mail
>transfer in that done by Popstar?

No; ANTsuite runs an SMTP server, so email is pushed to your system from the
ISP/mail-provider's servers.  It also means that mails between local users
are 'delivered' without actually leaving your system. 

It was because I used to use ANTsuite for mail transport that I originally
made 'my' version of AntiSpam so that it fetched mail via POP3 but created
the fetched files in the format that the ANTsuite would have done, so they
could be injected into the Suite's SMTP delivery queue.

-- 
Jeremy C B Nicoll - my opinions are my own.

Email sent to my from-address will be deleted. Instead, please reply
to newsreplyaaa@wingsandbeaks.org.uk replacing "aaa" by "284".  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6356

From"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk>
Date2012-09-05 14:19 +0100
Message-ID<52ca75293edave@davenoise.co.uk>
In reply to#6350
Just to clarify, do they install a fibre link to my house? Think Virgin
does - I have their cabling in this street. Or is it just so far and use
the existing cable?

-- 
*Be more or less specific *

    Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                  To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6358

FromBrian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk>
Date2012-09-05 18:12 +0100
Message-ID<438b8aca52.Brian@bhowlett.plus.net>
In reply to#6356
On 5 Sep, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

> Just to clarify, do they install a fibre link to my house? Think
> Virgin does - I have their cabling in this street. Or is it just so
> far and use the existing cable?

BT Infinity is largely FTTC (Fibre to the Cabinet) although they are 
also trialing FTTP (Fibre to the Premises).

In the first case they run fibre from the exchange to the PCP/cabinet, 
where your existing phone cable runs along its original route and is 
connected at the cabinet to the fibre link.

FTTP is a full installation of fibre to your property.
-- 
Brian Howlett - email to From: address deleted unseen
----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not telling you who I work for - in any case, there's no way
anything posted (or mailed!) by me can be attributed to them....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#6360

FromJohn Sandford <lists@thesandfords.me.uk>
Date2012-09-05 20:45 +0100
Message-ID<mpro.m9w6w2000aocr04ss.lists@thesandfords.me.uk>
In reply to#6356
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

> Just to clarify, do they install a fibre link to my house? Think Virgin
> does - I have their cabling in this street. Or is it just so far and use
> the existing cable?
> 
Virgin use fibre to the cabinet, the broadband and tv is a coaxial cable
from cabinet to the house not fibre.

John

-- 
John Sandford
Home

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.acorn.misc


csiph-web