Re: RPC and BT?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.acorn.misc
Subject	Re: RPC and BT?
Date	Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:29:04 +0100
Organization	timil.com
Lines	29
Message-ID	<528466e679tim@invalid.org.uk> (permalink)
References	<528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host	GqAcIUbqh27oTTI3Dt5hJw.user.speranza.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Pluto/3.04c (RISC-OS/5.16) NewsHound/v1.50-32
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.sys.acorn.misc:5038

Show key headers only | View raw

In article <528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk>, Dave Plowman (News)
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
> Took my laptop next door and found it seemed to work rather quicker.
> Their ISP is BT - mine was Pipex now Talktalk or whatever they call
> themselves now.

Do Pipex/talk Talk etc., have their own equipment installed in your
exchange or (as mine does here) does your ISP resell a BT connexion?

www.samknows.com/broadband/exchange_search

It may only be a better quality line, or a better/newer ADSL modem giving
better 'reception' down the wire. BT may be crap at a lot of things but
their Home Hubs seem pretty good.

[Snip]

> If I went over to BT, would there be problems setting everything up to
> work in the same way?

Can't see why there would be.

-- 
from Tim Hill who welcomes incoming email to tim at timil dot com.
* Share in a better energy supplier: http://tjrh.eu/coopnrg
* Share in cheaper ethical telecoms: http://tjrh.eu/phone
* Have a genuine & spam-proof address for Usenet http://www.invalid.org.uk/

... "Praising what is lost, makes the remembrance dear" All's Well, Act v, Sc.3

Thread

RPC and BT? "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:04 +0100
  Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:29 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 13:56 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 14:36 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 15:20 +0100
  Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 14:06 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-22 16:05 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:04 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 22:26 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:43 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:08 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:03 +0000
              Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 09:06 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 02:15 +0200
              Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 19:57 +0100
                Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 05:25 +0200
                Re: RPC and BT? cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-04-24 13:25 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Rosemary Miskin <miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 19:20 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:16 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 20:01 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 09:30 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 00:01 +0100

csiph-web