Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!

From	Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.acorn.misc
Subject	Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!
Date	2012-03-22 16:34 +0000
Organization	timil.com
Message-ID	<5274867213tim@invalid.org.uk> (permalink)
References	(18 earlier) <526f338d22see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <526f5c8a81tim@invalid.org.uk> <526f653757see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <5273667197tim@invalid.org.uk> <527422ed6csee.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <527422ed6csee.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>, Russell Hafter
News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote:
> In article <5273667197tim@invalid.org.uk>, Tim Hill
> <tim@invalid.org.uk> wrote:
> > In article <526f653757see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>, Russell
> > Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote:

> > [Snip]

> > > documents that have to be posted 

> [Snip]

> > > If the invoices were only on computer I would need a second
> > > monitor, so that I had one for the accounts program and one to
> > > replace the stack of papers next to the keyboard.

> > On this HD display there is plenty of room to show an invoice
> > on-screen alongside Prophet where I enter its details. Sometimes I
> > cut'n'paste which saves typing. Then the email with invoice
> > attachment is transferred to an external Pluto box called,
> > unsurprisingly, invoices_received.

> The accounting is done using a free copy (cover disc) of Quicken, under
> Windows.

> Were I to store documents on a computer, I would, I imagine want to do
> that under RISC OS. Currently I use a KVM switch to switch the monitor
> between machines, 

Thought of that but have the room and glad I went for two
keyboards/mice/screens rather than KVM. When I was given a second
1280x1024 display I thought I'd play with the second output on the
windoze box so now have three screens. But 1920x1080 on RISC OS is far
better than 2560x1024 on windows simply because of all the windoze window
furniture clutter and embiggened windows taking up a whole of a (1280)
screen without needing to.

> but if I were to replace paper copies (which I find
> **much** easier to handle), with scanned copies, 

I wasn't suggesting that. It can be an uphill battle asking people to
switch from sending paper to email(!!!): I have a dual filing system (one
physical, one virtual) and wouldn't spend my time scanning paper
documents I have been sent, just to file them away.

[Snip]

>and then I
> would need to get either a fancy monitor like yours,

Sorry. My 1280x1024 RISC OS display died.  :-(

A 22" 1920x1080 monitor is by no means fancy these days, nor particularly
expensive. Per pixel, it was the most economical screen real estate
available and it is true to say you can't have too many pixels. 85 quid
is not a fancy price for HD loveliness.  ;-)

http://tinyurl.com/AOC-F22S

[Snip]

> If instead they were digital, I would need to log in to a
> website to download the necessary certificates, then print them out.

Unless you were to leave the dead tree thoughts behind and e-send your
customer the same certificate you downloaded. 

[Snip]

> Were I a crook I could probably send a dozen different customers a scan
> of the same document and save a packet.

You could do the same thing with paper documents, were you a forger.
Remember: the first-time customer has no idea what any given certificate
is supposed to look like.

[Snip]

> > May be different, I know, but I have had motor

> Never.

There are many cases now (apparently) where boy racers insure their pride
and joy and then cancel the insurance but keep the certificate. Old Bill
will nearly always now not rely on dox and always check the DVLA
insurance database and/or with the company directly. This has meant that
motor insurance certificates have become of almost no use at the roadside
or even at the Nick within seven days!

Road Wars (on Sky) used to be replete with examples.

I think the insurance companies now say: "Certificates? Oh! What's the
point?"

[Snip]

> In much of the world - such as the USA you need to show your
> certificate to the medical practitioner before they will treat you.

Fair comment. Nobody was saying that the traveller shouldn't take a copy
with them.

Makes me wonder: if I had a PDF for travel insurance displayed in Kindle
on my phone will it be accepted by a US hospital in October? Not sure
I'll risk that! May take it in both formats and try that one first. :-)

[Snip]

> So you do accept that paper has its uses?

Yes the point was that YOU (probably) don't need to be doing the printing.

[Snip]

> Have you ever seen a PD document designed to be produced on a dot
> matrix printer that has instead been printed with a PoScript printer
> driver? 

Not for a long time. !Firewkz32 is in use on this Iyonix.

> These PD docs are not WYSIWYG. As the on screen characters are
> all the same size, a laser prints them all the same size, and in the
> system font. And the control characters as well. A dot matrix printer
> interprets the control codes and puts onto paper what is needed to make
> a coherent and legible document, printed in an appropriate font.

That sounds like a limitation of Pipedream. I think the only way round
that would be to print to a bitmap printer driver and then encapsulate
that bitmap file in a PDF. Something of a fiddle, and time consuming on a
RiscPC, of course.

-- 
Tim Hill of timil.com . . .
* supports TFT & shares in cheaper ethical telecoms http://tjrh.eu/phone
* has a genuine & spam-proof address for Usenet http://www.invalid.org.uk/
* accepts incoming email: substitute postmaster@ for tim@

... "Adieu, and take thy praise with thee to heaven" Henry IV, Act v, Sc.4

Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-09 12:23 +0000
  Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 13:46 +0000
    Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 15:37 +0000
      Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 16:11 +0000
    Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-09 18:01 +0000
      Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 18:51 +0000
  Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 14:40 +0000
    Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-09 17:28 +0000
      Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 19:13 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 20:15 +0000
      Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 19:28 +0000
  Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 16:38 +0000
    Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 09:05 +0000
      Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 09:11 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 10:46 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:23 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:29 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 16:13 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-11 17:28 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 18:25 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-11 23:25 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-11 20:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-12 20:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-12 22:35 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 12:57 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-13 10:21 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 13:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-14 18:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 20:10 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-15 21:30 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 17:18 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-15 08:42 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-15 11:03 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-18 10:04 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 09:48 +0000
      Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 10:54 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 11:52 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Graham Pickles <graham@durain.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 12:26 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:03 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Graham Pickles <graham@durain.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:26 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:40 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-10 16:23 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 16:57 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-10 17:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-10 21:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 22:44 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 04:09 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 06:52 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 08:38 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 10:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-11 11:04 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:37 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-11 10:31 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-11 20:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:18 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:31 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:23 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 15:46 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:15 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 07:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:15 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 08:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 09:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-14 11:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 20:54 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 21:14 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> - 2012-03-17 22:54 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 00:45 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> - 2012-03-18 09:25 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 15:36 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 16:52 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 16:40 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 17:56 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 20:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 21:05 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-18 22:40 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 11:07 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 14:39 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-20 13:32 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 14:56 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:09 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 11:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ollie Clark <usenet@ollieclark.com> - 2012-03-29 10:38 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-29 11:52 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-29 15:29 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-29 21:50 +0200
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-30 08:53 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-30 17:57 +0200
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 22:17 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-31 23:06 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:24 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Calder <alan_calder@o2.co.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:43 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 05:51 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-04 07:11 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 12:16 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 12:16 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-04-12 12:42 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-04-12 20:08 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 12:46 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-12 21:50 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 00:16 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-12 21:53 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 09:40 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-13 09:49 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-31 23:18 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:41 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-01 11:26 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 11:32 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-01 14:41 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 01:01 +0200
                OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 13:54 +0100
                OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-07 20:16 +0200
                Re: OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 19:50 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-29 20:28 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! John Rickman Iyonix <rickman@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:02 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:28 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:54 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:36 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 01:04 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:27 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 15:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:30 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-15 10:39 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:08 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-21 22:27 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Griffin <ajg@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:07 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Calder <alan_calder@o2.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 10:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 16:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:03 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 10:53 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 12:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:07 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:29 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 00:53 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 05:51 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:07 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:14 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-21 20:23 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-21 21:41 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-21 22:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 07:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Kevin Wells <kev@kevsoft.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:47 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 16:41 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 20:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 22:11 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 22:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 17:57 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 17:38 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-22 18:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess Hampshire <jesshampshire@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-23 11:59 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 13:15 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-23 13:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 19:36 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 19:58 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Richard Travers <richtnews@uwclub.net> - 2012-03-23 09:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:37 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-03-23 16:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 16:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:00 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:02 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Kevin Wells <kev@kevsoft.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 00:47 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Barry Gray <barrygray@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 08:14 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 08:24 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! ChrisF <c.n.l.f@virgin.net> - 2012-03-23 15:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-23 21:15 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! John Rickman Iyonix <rickman@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 22:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-24 16:54 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-25 00:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 18:04 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:08 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 19:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:23 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Griffin <ajg@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 11:22 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 00:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 03:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 06:01 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 15:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 16:04 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 10:45 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 01:07 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 11:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 18:20 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 09:44 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 11:09 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 12:59 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-17 17:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-17 20:05 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 16:37 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-18 18:29 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 21:01 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2012-03-18 12:03 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Barry Allen (news)" <evanallen@onetel.net.uk.invalid> - 2012-03-18 13:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 20:57 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 21:09 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 15:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-13 10:28 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 11:20 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:27 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 13:43 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 15:14 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 20:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 22:43 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-10 23:53 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 16:18 +0000

csiph-web