Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!

From	Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.acorn.misc
Subject	Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!
Date	2012-03-21 22:27 +0000
Organization	Russell Hafter Holidays
Message-ID	<527422ed6csee.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> (permalink)
References	(18 earlier) <almarsoft.2608909725453532102@news.orange.fr> <526f338d22see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <526f5c8a81tim@invalid.org.uk> <526f653757see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <5273667197tim@invalid.org.uk>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <5273667197tim@invalid.org.uk>, Tim Hill
<tim@invalid.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <526f653757see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>,
> Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>
> wrote:

> [Snip]

> > documents that have to be posted 

[Snip]

> > If the invoices were only on computer I would need a
> > second monitor, so that I had one for the accounts
> > program and one to replace the stack of papers next to
> > the keyboard.

> On this HD display there is plenty of room to show an
> invoice on-screen alongside Prophet where I enter its
> details. Sometimes I cut'n'paste which saves typing. Then
> the email with invoice attachment is transferred to an
> external Pluto box called, unsurprisingly,
> invoices_received.

The accounting is done using a free copy (cover disc) of
Quicken, under Windows.

Were I to store documents on a computer, I would, I imagine
want to do that under RISC OS. Currently I use a KVM switch
to switch the monitor between machines, but if I were to
replace paper copies (which I find **much** easier to
handle), with scanned copies, I would have to buy a scanner
(the one I have - cost £10 - only works under Win98) and
then I would need to get either a fancy monitor like yours,
or a second. I was given my current monitor, so I would need
to spend money on a fancy monitor, more money on a scanner,
and still end up with a less convenient system.

I just find it vastly simpler and quicker to look through
half a dozen bits of paper, some which may have hand written
notes on, rather than keeping loads of computer files. I can
glance at several sheets of paper in the time it takes to
open a single PDF.

> > But booking confirmations require to be accompanied by
> > insurance certificates which are only supplied on paper
> > and must, by law, be given to the customer.

> I understand that may be a requirement of the law
> (really? which one?)

The law that requires a tour operator to have a financial
protection scheme in place to protect client's monies. If
that scheme is insurance based, as mine is, the operator is
required to issue a certificate of insurance to each
customer.

> or the issuer so you are stuck with it!

I do not know whether there is anything that states that the
certificate must be on paper rather than a digital document,
but they are on paper. If instead they were digital, I would
need to log in to a website to download the necessary
certificates, then print them out. Much more time consuming
than issuing pre-printed and pre-numbered paper
certificates.

Were I a crook I could probably send a dozen different
customers a scan of the same document and save a packet.

The paper certificates are individually numbered, so sending
individual certificates by post is more secure than if I
were allowed to send out scans of the paper certificates.

> May be different, I know, but I have had motor

Never.

> and travel insurance certificates sent by email in the
> past.

Yes.

> Mind you, motor are on a national database which
> the old bill trust more than any self-printed document.
> All documents are too easy to forge. Travel insurance is
> optional anyway so only the issuing company is interested
> in the validity of the policy and they don't need the
> cert., for that. It's actually a certificate nobody needs
> really apart from proof of purchase.

In much of the world - such as the USA you need to show
your certificate to the medical practitioner before they
will treat you.

In an emergency I would much rather have a document to show
someone, rather than give them a URL or a phone number and
trust that they would spend their time checking to see if
cover were in place.

> It would really only be necessary to forward certs if
> they are printed on security paper of some sort with
> watermarks and suchlike and in the unlikely event that
> insured has to present that cert., back to the company in
> the case of a claim. If they are simply laser-printed
> onto ordinary stock, customers may as well print them.

So you do accept that paper has its uses?

> > Plus, you really cannot get a PDF version of a
> > Pipedream document meant to be printed on three part
> > NCR paper and expect it to look anything the way it is
> > supposed to look.

> In the  absence of NCR paper, and equipped with lasers,
> we can just print as many copies of stuff  as we need.
> Whether or not a document a customer prints is /exactly/
> as you see it in pdream probably doesn't matter as long
> as all the information is there. Unless your NCR paper is
> pre-printed with other important information I wouldn't
> worry.

Have you ever seen a PD document designed to be produced on
a dot matrix printer that has instead been printed with a
PoScript printer driver? These PD docs are not WYSIWYG. As
the on screen characters are all the same size, a laser
prints them all the same size, and in the system font. And
the control characters as well. A dot matrix printer
interprets the control codes and puts onto paper what is
needed to make a coherent and legible document, printed in
an appropriate font.

-- 
Russell
http://www.russell-hafter-holidays.co.uk
Russell Hafter Holidays         E-mail to enquiries at our domain
Need a hotel? <http://www.hrs.com/?client=en__blue&customerId=416873103>

Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-07 09:11 +0000
  Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 10:18 +0000
  Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 09:48 +0000
    Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 11:26 +0000
      Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-09 12:23 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 13:46 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 15:37 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 16:11 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-09 18:01 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 18:51 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 14:40 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-09 17:28 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 19:13 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 20:15 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 19:28 +0000
        Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 16:38 +0000
          Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 09:05 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 09:11 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 10:46 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:23 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Bailey <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:29 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 16:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-11 17:28 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 18:25 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-11 23:25 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-11 20:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-12 20:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Wisnia at home <david@wisnia.net> - 2012-03-12 22:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 12:57 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-13 10:21 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 13:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-14 18:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 20:10 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-15 21:30 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 17:18 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-15 08:42 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-15 11:03 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-18 10:04 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 09:48 +0000
            Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 10:54 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 11:52 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Graham Pickles <graham@durain.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 12:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:03 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Graham Pickles <graham@durain.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:40 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-10 16:23 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-10 16:57 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-10 17:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-10 21:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 22:44 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 04:09 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 06:52 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 08:38 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 10:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-11 11:04 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:37 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-11 10:31 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-11 20:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:18 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:31 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:23 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 15:46 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:15 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 07:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:15 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 08:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 09:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-14 11:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 20:54 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 21:14 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> - 2012-03-17 22:54 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 00:45 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dev <spam-addy@no.spam.invalid> - 2012-03-18 09:25 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 15:36 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 16:52 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 16:40 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 17:56 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 20:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 21:05 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! (OT) Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-18 22:40 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 11:07 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-19 14:39 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-20 13:32 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 14:56 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:09 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 11:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ollie Clark <usenet@ollieclark.com> - 2012-03-29 10:38 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-29 11:52 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-29 15:29 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-29 21:50 +0200
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-30 08:53 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-30 17:57 +0200
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 22:17 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-31 23:06 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:24 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Calder <alan_calder@o2.co.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:43 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "David Holden" <SpamBin@apdl.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 05:51 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-04 07:11 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 12:16 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 12:16 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-04-12 12:42 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-04-12 20:08 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 12:46 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-12 21:50 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 00:16 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-12 21:53 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-13 09:40 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-13 09:49 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-31 23:18 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:41 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-01 11:26 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Dawes <alan.dawes@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 11:32 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-01 14:41 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-01 01:01 +0200
                OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 13:54 +0100
                OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-07 20:16 +0200
                Re: OT (Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18!) Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 19:50 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-29 20:28 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! John Rickman Iyonix <rickman@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:02 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:28 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:54 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 22:36 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 01:04 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:27 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 15:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:30 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-15 10:39 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:08 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-21 22:27 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Griffin <ajg@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:07 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Calder <alan_calder@o2.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 10:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 16:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:03 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 10:53 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 12:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:07 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 08:29 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 00:53 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 05:51 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:07 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-20 12:14 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-21 20:23 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-21 21:41 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-21 22:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 07:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Kevin Wells <kev@kevsoft.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 09:47 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 16:41 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 20:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 22:11 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 22:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 17:57 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 17:38 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-22 18:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess Hampshire <jesshampshire@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-23 11:59 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 13:15 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Brian Jordan <brian.jordan9@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-23 13:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 19:36 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-22 19:58 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Richard Travers <richtnews@uwclub.net> - 2012-03-23 09:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:37 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Bryn Evans <d@a.invalid> - 2012-03-23 16:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 16:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:00 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:02 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-23 11:12 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Kevin Wells <kev@kevsoft.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 00:47 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Barry Gray <barrygray@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 08:14 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-23 08:24 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! ChrisF <c.n.l.f@virgin.net> - 2012-03-23 15:48 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-23 21:15 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! John Rickman Iyonix <rickman@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-23 22:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-24 11:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2012-03-24 16:54 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-25 00:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 18:04 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 05:08 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 18:35 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 19:19 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 21:23 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Alan Griffin <ajg@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-11 11:22 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 00:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 03:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 06:01 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 15:49 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-03-12 16:04 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-12 17:34 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 10:45 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 01:07 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 11:56 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 18:20 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 09:44 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 11:09 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 12:59 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-17 17:26 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-17 20:05 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 16:37 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-18 18:29 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-18 21:01 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2012-03-18 12:03 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! "Barry Allen (news)" <evanallen@onetel.net.uk.invalid> - 2012-03-18 13:55 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 20:57 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 21:09 +0100
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 15:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-13 10:28 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2012-03-11 11:20 +0000
              Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 13:27 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 13:43 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 15:14 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-03-10 20:13 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Hughes <news@noonehere.co.uk> - 2012-03-10 22:43 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-10 23:53 +0000
                Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-11 16:18 +0000
  Re: The good, the bad and the RO 5.18! Ron Briscoe <ron.briscoe@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 17:40 +0000

csiph-web