Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.apps > #19472
| From | Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.apps |
| Subject | Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. |
| Date | 2025-06-13 11:24 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <5c2c480401bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <101vj6r$2f9q5$1@dont-email.me> <5c292ee471bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <102bgqo$1sm55$1@dont-email.me> <5c2b3b466abob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <102fnio$2vn29$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <102fnio$2vn29$1@dont-email.me>, druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: > On 11/06/2025 10:29, Bob Latham wrote: > > In article <102bgqo$1sm55$1@dont-email.me>, > > druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: > >> https://thepihut.com/products/aluminium-armour-heatsink-case-for raspberry-pi-4?variant=31291393671230 > > > > I preferred the red but school physics lessons > > taught me that matt black was the best radiator. Royal mail should > > deliver later today. > I was willing to sacrifice a very small amount of emissivity (it's > anodised so better than paint) for the slightly larger increase in > aesthetics. I get that. I've been surprised by just how warm this case gets, it borders on hot and yet I've not seen the seen the cpu above 56deg. Didn't expect that. Bob.
Back to comp.sys.acorn.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 10:53 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 11:48 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 12:11 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 13:56 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Harriet Bazley <harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 14:04 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 15:12 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 17:47 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 17:45 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Harriet Bazley <harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 19:30 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 15:30 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 11:37 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 12:23 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 12:49 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 14:25 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 14:44 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2025-06-06 18:19 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 18:41 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 19:39 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 20:21 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-06 21:31 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-07 11:01 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-11 10:04 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-11 10:29 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-13 00:24 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-13 11:24 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-06 21:14 +0100
Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-07 11:04 +0100
csiph-web