Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc.

From	druck <news@druck.org.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.acorn.apps
Subject	Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc.
Date	2025-06-11 10:04 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<102bgqo$1sm55$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <5c28d51d70bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <756dda285c.chris@mytardis> <5c28de53b6bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <101vj6r$2f9q5$1@dont-email.me> <5c292ee471bob@sick-of-spam.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 07/06/2025 11:01, Bob Latham wrote:
> In article <101vj6r$2f9q5$1@dont-email.me>,
>     druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
>> On 06/06/2025 20:21, Bob Latham wrote:
> I've not done it for a while so after your comments I've just done a
> speed comparison. This is a music library scan. I opens every track
> in the library and checks the tagging meets my reuirements before
> closing the file again. The code is written in basic assembler.
> 
> It uses both Sunfish and Lanman98 simultaneously, it does this
> because I've never found a file Sunfish couldn't see but plenty LM98
> can't see at all. However, I do change the names etc. to make it
> useable from LM98, I don't mind wrong characters being displayed but
> they must be fully useable.
> 
> Results this morning.
> 
> Mini.m 13 minutes 49 seconds.
> Pi4 13 mins 7 seconds.
> 
> The pi4 is noisy and has no real time clock.
> 
> That's why I don't use it.
> 
> If you can tell me why this task shows little if any difference I
> would be delighted.
> 
> NAS is synology DS218.

It's entirely dependent on your network and your NAS, so it's hardly 
surprising there is hardly any difference in speed.

>> There are two options, my RISC OS Pi 4B has the big aluminum block
>> heatsink case, so is completely silent and never runs too hot with
>> RISC OS only using a single core.
> 
> Not seen that, I'll see if I can find one.

This is what I'm using

https://shop.pimoroni.com/products/aluminium-heatsink-case-for-raspberry-pi-4?variant=30924235997267

https://thepihut.com/products/aluminium-armour-heatsink-case-for-raspberry-pi-4?variant=31291393671230

---druck

Back to comp.sys.acorn.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 10:53 +0100
  Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 11:48 +0100
    Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 12:11 +0100
      Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 13:56 +0100
        Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Harriet Bazley <harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 14:04 +0100
          Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 15:12 +0100
          Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 17:47 +0100
    Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 17:45 +0100
      Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Harriet Bazley <harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 19:30 +0100
        Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Paul Stewart <phorefaux@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 15:30 +0100
  Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 11:37 +0100
    Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 12:23 +0100
      Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 12:49 +0100
        Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 14:25 +0100
          Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 14:44 +0100
          Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2025-06-06 18:19 +0100
            Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 18:41 +0100
              Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Chris Hughes <news13@noonehere.co.uk> - 2025-06-06 19:39 +0100
                Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-06 20:21 +0100
                Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-06 21:31 +0100
                Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-07 11:01 +0100
                Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-11 10:04 +0100
                Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-11 10:29 +0100
                Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-13 00:24 +0100
                Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-13 11:24 +0100
  Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2025-06-06 21:14 +0100
    Re: RISCOS browsers and google etc. Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2025-06-07 11:04 +0100

csiph-web