Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.std.c > #6569

Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior?

From Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.std.c
Subject Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior?
Date 2023-09-08 22:31 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87fs3omjxj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References (10 earlier) <a3199783-d8b7-4065-836b-08f647a6808en@googlegroups.com> <861qfcp3q5.fsf@linuxsc.com> <b4qdnRse5OVYemT5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <87sf7qnefn.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <p5KdnX4UMaaDE2b5nZ2dnZeNn_pj4p2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> writes:

> On 2023-09-07 18:19, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> writes:
>> 
>>> As another example, I have speed critical code that relies on running
>>> on 2s complement machines with wraparound on signed integer overflow, and
>>> that code is being very clear and explicit in doing so, but there
>>> is no C90 notation to tell all ISO-C implementation that this is the
>>> intention, thus it is explicit only in comments, not in the tokens
>>> passed to the C compiler.
>> You can tell the compiler you want 2s complement by using the intN_t
>> types if you can find one that suits your portability requirements.
>> And can you not use unsigned arithmetic, re-interpreting as signed for
>> those places where it matters?  The "overflow" can only happen in
>> the arithmetic, not in the re-interpretation.
>> I know this is a deviation from the topic, so feel free to ignore if you
>> don't want to get into it.
>
> The code in question has as explicit design condition that the compiler
> implements signed versions with wraparound for each unsigned int type .
>
> The code cannot rely on the intN_t types because they were not part of
> C90 and thus do not exist as separate types in some targeted
> compilers.

Ah, I didn't know targetting C90 was still a thing.  I've been out of
the business for many years.

> Excessive casting where directly using the desired type seems possible
> is highly counter-intuitive and thus it is inherently wrong for an
> optimizer to presume the right to mangle code using types such as "int",
> "short int", "long int" and "signed char".

I wasn't suggesting casts as they don't remove the undefined behaviour.
But you have a design that suits your needs so it's all good.

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 22:16 -0700
  Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-07-21 16:33 +0100
    Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 11:56 -0700
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-07-21 20:54 +0100
        Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 14:26 -0700
          Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-07-21 23:39 +0100
          Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-12 17:00 -0700
            Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 23:41 -0700
              Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-15 21:06 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 22:40 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-16 23:13 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-08-17 07:08 +0000
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 12:44 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-08-19 05:04 +0000
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 01:36 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-08-19 09:18 -0400
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:12 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-18 20:20 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-08-19 05:23 +0000
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-18 22:56 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 12:52 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-26 19:25 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-08-27 08:31 +0000
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-29 04:35 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-08-30 19:53 +0000
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-30 17:40 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-08-31 18:18 +0000
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-09-05 05:39 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-09-05 17:03 -0700
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2023-09-07 17:09 +0200
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-09-07 17:19 +0100
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2023-09-08 23:12 +0200
                Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-09-08 22:31 +0100
    Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-07-22 06:40 +0000
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 06:03 -0700
        Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-07-25 21:53 -0700
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-16 11:11 -0700
  Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-07-21 17:42 +0000
    Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2023-07-24 07:53 +0200
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-07-25 21:57 -0700
  Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-03 13:13 -0700
    Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-08-03 15:20 -0700
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Martin Uecker <ma.uecker@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 01:15 -0700
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-16 09:19 -0700
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-08-16 19:51 +0000
      Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-08-16 20:03 +0000
        Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 13:43 -0700
          Re: Does reading an uninitialized object have undefined behavior? Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-08-16 21:08 +0000

csiph-web