Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Daniel Krügler<daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Text form of ::std:: complex |
| Date | 2011-09-25 08:27 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j5n30k$bmv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <j5kivh$2bbe$1@news2.ipartners.pl> |
Am 25.09.2011 06:47, schrieb Krzysztof Żelechowski: > Is there any reason why the text form of ::std:: complex is (u,v) and not > (u+v*i)? > The text form of fundamental types is human-readable and > intuitive, except for complex numbers. Well, the criteria for intuition are not the only once that determine such a decision, efficiency and simplicity have similar weights. Given your alternative example, I would argue that "u+v*i" is even more natural and I would expect that "v*i" just works as well. But given the fact that C++ does not have direct support for imaginary numbers, the current format decision is IMO a logical conclusion. HTH& Greetings from Bremen, Daniel Krügler -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Text form of ::std:: complex Krzysztof Żelechowski<giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> - 2011-09-24 21:47 -0700
Re: Text form of ::std:: complex Daniel Krügler<daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-25 08:27 -0700
Re: Text form of ::std:: complex Krzysztof Żelechowski<giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> - 2011-09-26 08:58 -0700
Re: Text form of ::std:: complex Christopher Dearlove<christopher.dearlove@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-07 16:09 -0700
csiph-web