Re: Repitition in grammer

From	Daniel Krügler<daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.std.c++
Subject	Re: Repitition in grammer
Date	2011-09-25 08:28 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<j5n164$1md$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<43f1e1eb-f815-4708-b83e-75c647c01c9e@m38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <j58hff$5mg$1@dont-email.me> <2f031b2b-1ebb-41ac-b108-bd87434724fb@18g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 25.09.2011 06:47, schrieb cv_curious:
>  Am I to understand that the relevant grammar for each portion of the
>  language is normatively defined within the respective section in the
>  standard?

The relevant point is, whether it is described in a normative part of
the standard. Usually this means, that the relevant grammar is explained
in the corresponding clause or sub-clause.

>  Meaning, the grammer for preprocessing directives (for
>  example) present in Sec 16 is normative and a parser writer should
>  refer there. Am I getting this right?

Yes, this is normative text.

HTH&  Greetings from Bremen,

Daniel Krügler



-- 
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Repitition in grammer cv_curious <phdscholar80@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-16 19:46 -0700
  Re: Repitition in grammer Daniel Krügler<daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-20 10:10 -0700
    Re: Repitition in grammer cv_curious<phdscholar80@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-24 21:47 -0700
      Re: Repitition in grammer Daniel Krügler<daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-25 08:28 -0700
  Re: Repitition in grammer Joshua Maurice<joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 11:08 -0700

csiph-web