Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:10:04 -0600 |
| Return-Path | <cppmods@glengoyne.dreamhost.com> |
| Sender | std-cpp-request@vandevoorde.com |
| Approved | austern@google.com |
| Message-ID | <df49pcF8opiU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| From | Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> |
| Subject | Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support |
| Organization | unknown |
| References | <ddpc8vF69dfU5@mid.individual.net> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:49:16 +0100 |
| X-Submission-Address | std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com |
| Date | Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:07:39 CST |
| Lines | 33 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-VCripHIIrDwYKwhUWW8H6S3Ovv/XSGCsRiIP/IcsAgLqiwKy6k1aqjQb9ildeylvaoc4qIsNZrVauRe!v5+fWTVDf7HmTnHYe2gAKZcoeXvwAeMSZSTvJTo3X5Sker3a4jQdZkgDN5s= |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@giganews.com |
| X-DMCA-Notifications | http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2085 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.std.c++:779 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2016-01-05 20:16, Ian Collins wrote: > > > Hello, > > Has there ever been a move to formally identify standard library > headers that don't require run time (especially dynamic allocation) > support? An obvious example would be <array>. > > The reason I ask is to make at least a subset of the standard library > available to smaller embedded projects. >  > > No, I don't think so. The standards committee is, in general, not very fond of defining language subsets. They strongly prefer compilers to implement the whole language. Bo Persson -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> - 2016-01-05 13:16 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> - 2016-01-15 13:07 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2016-02-08 11:27 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Ian Collins <ian-news@this.is.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:18 -0600
Re: Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-04-01 19:07 -0600
csiph-web